10 measurements spanning 7 days, net -73. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,233–15,328 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 13:17
15,244
-5
12 Aug 2026, 15:14
15,249
-11
11 Aug 2026, 12:53
15,260
-7
10 Aug 2026, 16:16
15,267
-18
9 Aug 2026, 17:03
15,285
-8
8 Aug 2026, 13:56
15,293
-7
7 Aug 2026, 14:28
15,300
-15
6 Aug 2026, 14:01
15,315
-2
6 Aug 2026, 02:20
15,317
no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:37
15,317
first reading
Engagement
27 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.90%
avg views ÷ 15,244 subscribers
Avg views / post
899
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 27 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held
27 (9 July 2026 – 14 August 2026)
Views total
19,772
Reactions total
337
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
490
Videos
35
Links
531
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
384 reactions across 26 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
182
47.4%
🔥
88
22.9%
🐳
37
9.64%
❤
26
6.77%
🕊
24
6.25%
😁
23
5.99%
⚡
1
0.26%
❤🔥
1
0.26%
🍾
1
0.26%
🤣
1
0.26%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 394reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 27 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @crypton_calendar. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 27 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
😱 Фармим поинты с бустом на Lighter
Lighter — это PerpDEX с упором на безопасность и масштабируемость.
Токен проекта торгуется почти на всех биржах по $2,2.
▪️ Совместно с Robinhood Chain проект запустил ивент:
— Переходим на сайт;
— Подключаем кошелёк;
— Набиваем торговые объёмы, как на любом perp-DEX.
Для X2 поинтов торгуйте через Robinhood Wallet.
Неплохая активность, которая вдобавок бустит шансы на дроп от…
🤖 Фармим поинты в BitRobot
BitRobot — децентрализованная лаборатория робототехники на Solana.
Проект привлёк $8 млн инвестиций от Solana Ventures, PL Capital, Stermion и других.
▪️ Недавно проект открыл доступ к Robotics Lab и запустил программу поинтов:
— Регистрируемся на сайте;
— Связываем аккаунт с Axis Robotics;
— Подключаем соцсети;
— Выполняем задания в "Contribute";
— Забираем бейджи.
📅 Эпоха фарма продл…
👀 Подаёмся в Wait-list GoDark
GoDark — конфиденциальный PerpDEX на Solana.
Разработчики проекта привлекли $4 млн от GSR. Также GSR, Copper поддерживают проект.
▪️ Сейчас у проекта проходит закрытый теснет:
— Переходим на сайт и оставляем почту в разделе "Access GoDark First".
В отличии от других PerpDEX проект имеет поддержку от крупных веб2 компаний и имеет интеграции с банковскими системами (Wire / ACH / SEPA)…
🚀 Фармим поинты и делим пул в $100 000
Vangrid — это протокол, созданный для сбора данных для ИИ, роботов и автономных систем.
Проект привлек $9 млн от HashKey Capital, Animoca Brands, Cryptocom, Gate Labs и других.
✅ Инструкция:
— Подключаем кошелёк и соцсети на сайте;
— Выполняем задания;
— Скачиваем мобильное приложение и отправляем видео;
— Приглашаем рефералов.
Вероятно, помимо $100 000 в конце фарма распре…
⌨️ Новые квесты в Startale
Startale — аналог Base App от Soneium.
Ранее о проекте мы рассказывали здесь.
✅ Недавно запустились новые квесты:
— Переходим в Startale;
— Свапаем любой актив на 5 USDSC;
— Обмениваем ETH на $10 в USDSC;
— Вносим в стейкинг $10 в USDC;
— Предоставляем ликвидность в паре USDSC/USDC на $10.
За квесты вы суммарно получите 100 поинтов.
📅 Дедлайн до 19 августа.
Когда-нибудь сезонные квес…
Фармим поинты на квестах и предсказаниях ⌨️
RAX Finance — RWA-протокол, который токенизирует GPU-мощность и энергию дата-центров, превращая их в on-chain активы.
Проект привлёк $4 млн от HashKey, FBG Capital и других.
▪️ Как проявить активность:
— Регистрируемся на сайте;
— Выполняем задания;
— Приглашаем рефералов.
— Коннектим кошелёк и соцсети к Telegram.
— Также каждый день ставим прогнозы на стоимость NVIDIA…
👨💻 Пробегаем тестнет Omnibook
Omnibook — высокочастотный рынок предсказаний.
Проект поддерживается Entrepreneurs First (акселератор стартапов. Из под их крыла вышел Gensyn, Reya и тд. ).
✅ Как проявить активность:
▪️ Переходим на сайт и авторизуемся через гугл;
▪️ В разделе Rewards ежедневно протыкиваем квесты;
▪️ Ежедневно набиваем торговые объёмы.
Каждый день на баланс будут капать тестовые $100.
Но с начисле…
😱 Бронируем домены от Cloudflare
Cloudflare обеспечивает работоспособность всего мирового интернета.
▪️ Буквально вчера компания анонсировала запуск Cloudflare Wallets — кошельков для ИИ-агентов.
Через них агенты смогут сами платить за API, данные и контент через крипту.
✅ Как получить домен:
▪️ Переходим на сайт;
▪️ Придумываем и забираем себе домен с кошельком.
Cloudflare известна во всём мире. Если эти кошел…
✈️ Фармим поинты под потенциальный дроп
Pond AI — маркетплейс, где пользователи размещают задачи, а ИИ-агенты и специалисты выполняют их.
Проект привлёк $7,5 млн от Coinbase Ventures, Delphi Ventures и других.
▪️ Регистрируемся на сайте;
▪️ В профиле переходим в раздел "My Points";
▪️ Выполняем задания;
▪️ Также в разделе "Tasks" проходим квесты от пользователей.
Раз крипта пока не стреляет, может, ИИ + крипта в …
Пробегаемся по тестнету Umia ⌨️
Umia — платформа, на которой проекты могут привлекать финансирование и запускать токены с токеномикой, заблокированной в смарт-контрактах.
Об инвестициях ничего неизвестно, но проект поддержали Eth Labs.
▪️ Переходим на сайт и подключаем кошелёк;
▪️ Запрашиваем тестовые токены в кране
(кран лагает - выдаёт раза с 20);
▪️ Обмениваем USDC на различные токены;
▪️ Заносим USDC в проекты…
🩸Кровавый энтерпрайз на $5 млрд!
Летом 2022 года на вилле в Тоскане основатель "Тинькофф Банка" собрал бывших топ-менеджеров и предложил построить банк с нуля — в чужой стране, без бренда, без лицензии и без клиентской базы.
Отказался только один человек.
▪️Спустя три года стартап Plata обгонит ранний "Тинькофф" в 2-3 раза, получит банковскую лицензию в Мексике и будет оценён в $5 млрд.
В новом видео мы разобрали…
⌨️ Минтим KOR ID под потенциальный дроп
KOR Protocol — экосистема, которая позволяет лицензировать и монетизировать авторский контент.
Проект привлёк $7,5 млн от 1kx, Blockchain Capital и других.
▪️ Инструкция:
▪️ Переходим на сайт и подключаем кошелёк;
▪️ Придумываем юзернейм и минтим KOR ID (понадобится немного ETH в Base);
▪️ Подключаем X и приглашаем рефералов.
По заявлениям команды, проект уже востребован н…
👍8🔥3🐳2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @crypton_calendar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 112,303 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypton Earn | Дропы и активности” (@crypton_calendar), 15,244 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypton_calendar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.