Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
64 measurements spanning 96 days, net -160. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,405–12,613 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 08:49
12,429
-5
9 Nov 2026, 17:50
12,434
-5
8 Nov 2026, 10:37
12,439
-15
6 Nov 2026, 07:19
12,454
-4
5 Nov 2026, 09:49
12,458
-6
4 Nov 2026, 10:26
12,464
-1
3 Nov 2026, 12:09
12,465
-3
2 Nov 2026, 15:26
12,468
-3
1 Nov 2026, 18:58
12,471
+15
31 Oct 2026, 21:04
12,456
-10
30 Oct 2026, 21:38
12,466
-10
29 Oct 2026, 23:05
12,476
-9
28 Oct 2026, 22:15
12,485
+2
27 Oct 2026, 18:29
12,483
-6
26 Oct 2026, 16:57
12,489
-1
25 Oct 2026, 18:37
12,490
-2
23 Oct 2026, 19:56
12,492
+2
22 Oct 2026, 22:49
12,490
+1
21 Oct 2026, 20:47
12,489
+6
20 Oct 2026, 14:00
12,483
first reading
Engagement
52 posts held, back to 18 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
25.4%
avg views ÷ 12,429 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,160
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.861%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 52 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
52 (18 June 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
15,790
Reactions total
136
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 08:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1,301 reactions across 52 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
396
30.4%
🔥
308
23.7%
👍
209
16.1%
👀
132
10.1%
🤝
89
6.84%
🤗
54
4.15%
🍾
44
3.38%
🐳
22
1.69%
custom 5244993626420819967
20
1.54%
🙏
17
1.31%
custom 5203990892200869590
10
0.769%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 52 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,301 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (20.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
BTC сейчас $76 000 - идём к $70 000 или развернёмся раньше?
Для тех, кто пропустил стрим в четверг, вырезал 3 минуты с моими мыслями: почему пока считаю это коррекцией и чего жду на графике перед покупкой.
Смотреть видео: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWQVn1WRIBE
Вести с Mantle-полей
Один из крупнейших ИИ-разработчиков Anthropic (создатель нейросети Claude) упоминает Mantle как пример реального использования L2-инфраструктуры в своем вчерашнем посте.
Параллельно с этим на форуме проходит обсуждение за признание Halo Prime - нового эмитента токенизированных акций mStocks. Если у вас есть холдерский MNT вы можете также принять участие в голосовании с 9 по 15 ноября.
Не смотр…
Отрабатываю промо-акцию от ONDO Perps
Платформа запустила маркетинговую кампанию, в рамках которой можно получить 20$ за регистрацию и выполнение простых условий, если выплатят за рефералку - переведу вам еще 20$ после начисления наград. КУС для участия не требуется, можно легко масштабировать "друзей", весь процесс занимает около 5-10 минут на аккаунт.
Пошаговый алгоритм действий:
1. Прокси. СНГ в бане, используе…
Bybit и Mantle запускают токенизированные акции mStocks
Сегодня прошло выступление Ben Zhou (CEO Bybit), где было анонсировано важное партнерство с Mantle в секторе RWA.
mStocks: это токенизированные акции, обеспеченные 1:1 реальными ценными бумагами. Запуск планируется уже в ноябре. Конвертация между реальными акциями и токенами mStocks будет доступна 24/7 прямо на Bybit.
Mantle: сеть выступит площадкой для DEX-т…
BTC: наблюдаю за графиком
Биткоин сейчас зажат между двух читаемых уровней. Выход выше $84 500 с закреплением усилит сценарий роста к $87 000. Уход ниже $82 500 - сценарий падения в район $79 000.
Пока это ориентиры для наблюдения.
💫STRK
Starknet официально объявил, что активно рассматривает переход с Ethereum L2 на независимый Layer 1, чтобы стать первой полностью квантово-устойчивой сетью к 2027 году.
Источник: https://x.com/starknet/status/2108113391525204034?s=46
Если задавались вопросам, почему токен начал отталкиваться от дна сейчас.
Худший скам года!
Короче, вот и приплыли... Только вчера писал про Blast и вот опять прям ножом по сердцу от Abstract... Но если Blast хотя бы дал нам нормально заработать перед тем, как уйти на покой, то тут абсолютный скам и плевок в лицо комьюнити.
Сегодня Abstract официально объявил о закрытии и сеть прекратит свою работу 15 декабря 2026 года.
Я отрабатывал этот проект с самого старта. Полтора года фарма ХР, с…
Сеть Blast официально закрывается, вывод средств до 26 октября
Мы много времени уделили активностям в сети Blast, смогли неплохо на ней заработать, но увы, история главной L2-сети с доходностью подходит к концу. Команда Pacman объявила о сворачивании проекта, так как расходы на содержание инфраструктуры L2 превысили комиссии и доходы сети.
Если у вас остались средства на Blast (или в его экосистеме) забрать нужно до…
Осталось 3 часа до окончания сейла Jumper на Legion.
Заносили? +/- отпишите в комментарии
❤8👍3🍾1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @crypto_davy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @crypto_davy as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
7 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
7 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
PROCENT @procent_crypto · 21,125 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 September 2026
Crypto Hamster @thecryptohamster · 19,454 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 September 2026
PROFIT DRIVE @profit_drive · 21,387 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 September 2026
CryptoInside @crypt0inside · 28,288 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
Whitelist Media @whitelist1 · 40,635 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 29 August 2026
Coin Metrika @CoinMetrika · 34,324 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 September 2026
БОГДАН, ГДЕ ИКСЫ?! @BogdanGdeX · 25,460 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
Климченко | про криптовалюту @thevse · 34,632 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
Славик инвестор | TwitterScore.io @slavik_investor · 24,311 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 September 2026
CryptoEarn Important @CryptoEarnImp · 27,323 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026
Liberty ICO | Crypto @libertycryptoq · 20,165 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 September 2026
❄️Bad Santa AI&Crypto @BadSantaDrop · 21,658 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 September 2026
ProMint @ProMintChannel · 24,794 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
Banlife теперь в Telegram @banlife_crypto · 21,275 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 24 September 2026
CryptoHustle & AI @crypthustle · 19,621 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 27 September 2026
Crypto & AI Updates | Славик инвестор @Slavik_investor_updates · 20,559 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 September 2026
moni talks [крипта] @moni_talks · 24,502 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 September 2026
Don | Invest Blog @don_invest · 37,439 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 31 August 2026
Incrypted Airdrops @incrypted_airdrops · 45,716 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 26 August 2026
Крипту⚡️Фармим @cryptfarm · 19,314 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 1 October 2026
Crypto Drive @drivecrypto · 26,099 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 September 2026
Max Zarev @maxzarev · 24,445 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 September 2026
Фармер: Крипта и Схемы @byrealfarmer · 51,990 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 August 2026
IDO research @idoresearch · 55,869 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 37 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Davy” (@crypto_davy), 12,429 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_davy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.