☕️ Верим в чашку с ручкой и стаканку $ETH минимум по 7000$?
😁54🐳10😍2

Channel
@CryptoAbuzik
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
22,207subscribers
-126 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001217841732 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryptoAbuzik |
| Description | All info: Админ канала - @Abuzik Рекламный менеджеры - , @Abuzik @optar_cpa, @S0ni_k |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryptoAbuzik |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 04:48 | 22,207 | -32 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:37 | 22,239 | -20 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:42 | 22,259 | -19 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:55 | 22,278 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 22,281 | -20 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:10 | 22,301 | -21 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 22,322 | -11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:00 | 22,333 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:56 | 22,333 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
348 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 211 | 60.6% | |
| ❤ | 60 | 17.2% | |
| 👍 | 38 | 10.9% | |
| 🐳 | 22 | 6.32% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 2.01% | |
| 😍 | 5 | 1.44% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 1.44% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 348reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 October 2025 to 18 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @CryptoAbuzik. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 October 2025 to 18 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
☕️ Верим в чашку с ручкой и стаканку $ETH минимум по 7000$?
😁54🐳10😍2
кто инфополе из фри каналов собирает, можете подборку глянуть с ребятами за которыми сам слежу - https://t.me/addlist/j_a0ltiLehY0NmQy все ирли проекты в открытом доступе есть. может чего найдете для себя.
👍11❤8
$3.7 квадриллиона. Ончейн. Уже в 2026. SEC официально разрешили DTCC токенизировать реальные активы. И это уже не тест и не пилот — это запуск. DTCC — это сердце американских рынков: акции, ETF, трежерис. Они гоняют 3.7 квадриллиона долларов в год. И теперь всё это можно выводить на блокчейн. Что именно токенизируют: • Russell 1000 • Крупные ETF • U.S. Treasuries Это чуть ли не самая крупная ликвидность на финанс…
👍22❤5
Очередная раздача от MEXC — на этот раз $STABLE. Лаунчпад реально годный: можно зайти по $0.015, а новым аккаунтам дают цену вообще $0.01. Такое не скипаем. Что делаем: 1️⃣Регистрируемся на MEXC и подтверждаем аккаунт. 2️⃣Влетаем в лаунчпад $STABLE 3️⃣Выполняем задания с депозитом. 4️⃣Накатываем торговый оборот на споте и фьючах. Дедлайн — 8 декабря
🔥6❤4
Залетаем в новый Xpool от BingX Биржа выкатила свежий лаунчпул с токеном MON. Награды сначала в виде MON Points, но потом их конвертнут в токены Что делаем? 1️⃣ Регистрируемся 2️⃣ Летим в лаунчпул 3️⃣ Вносим USDT или MON (проект появится в пн) 4️⃣ Фармим поинты и ждём награды Риска почти нет, почему бы не забрать свой профит Период фарма: 24–28 ноября
👍3😍1
MMT сделал X2 Всего одной 4ч свечой мы увидели огромный рост Объёмы взлетели, тренд развернули, и теперь $MMT летит так, будто решил наверстать всё падение за один день. Если это только разогрев — дальше может быть ещё веселее.
🐳12😁8❤4
Momentum продолжает расширять экосистему — на этот раз RWA-сектор. Momentum объявили партнёрство с @realtbook, чтобы запускать реальные активы на @SuiNetwork. @MMTFinance залетают в StableFi-слой TBook и фактически прокачивают всю систему токенизации на Sui: — улучшенное распределение активов — нормальная идентификация пользователей — масштаб для RWA Плюс уже выкатили первый on-chain Contribution SBT — чисто бонус…
😁7❤5😍2🔥1
OKX опять кормит На этот раз у нас есть шанс залутать MMT, потому что завезли новый X Launch от @MMTFinance. Пул наград — 1.5M $MMT Если хотите участвовать — успейте зарегистрироваться до 17 ноября, 4:00 UTC. Вот ссылка: https://web3.okx.com/ru/boost/x-launch/mmt?shortCode=o7b9AM Клейм стартует 17 ноября в 7:00 UTC.
😁12❤1
Новая возможность забрать 15 000 $COMMON (~130$) На Bybit стартовала активность Puzzle Hunt с общим призовым фондом 10 000 000 $COMMON. За полноценный собранный пазл начисляют 15 000 $COMMON, и участвовать может каждый. Как залутать награду? 1️⃣ Переходим по ссылке 2️⃣ Собираем 9 элементов пазла — их можно получать за ежедневные активности, пополнения, трейдинг или обмениваться фрагментами с другими пользователям…
😁15❤2😱1
Momentum запускает Perp DEX в стиле Hyperliquid DEX будет работать на SUI, а под капотом — движок Aster, который отвечает за риск-менеджмент, ликвидации и кросс-залог. По сути, это первый perp DEX на Sui, который сможет конкурировать с централизованными биржами по скорости и UX. Подробней планы @MMTFinance можете изучить здесь https://x.com/MMTFinance/status/1988113764542242976?s=20
😁13👍2
$MMT Аирдроп Momentum наконец-то раздали $MMT и $veMMT, которые должны были выдать ещё 4 ноября — так что залетайте и клеймите пока не забыли. Клейм тут: https://airdrop.mmt.finance/ Самое интересное — это $veMMT. Это тот самый токен, на который будут распределяться байбеки $MMT от доходов протокола. По сути, это твоя доля в прибыли Momentum. И да — те veMMT, что нам дали, залочены на 4 года, но именно они начина…
😁11❤1
Интересная обновка от Momentum подъехала — запускают байбек $MMT уже завтра. Я бы не называл это чем-то неожиданным, но направление выбрали правильное: проект двигается в сторону полноценной модели ve(3,3), где активные участники получают всё больше. Протокол будет выкупать MMT за счёт своей прибыли. Все заработанные токены распределят между холдерами veMMT. То есть теперь в стейкинге появляется дополнительный смыс…
😁12
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CryptoAbuzik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 384,874 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Abuzik” (@CryptoAbuzik), 22,207 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoAbuzik.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.