Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Cryptobiznes

@crypt_biznes

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

27,495subscribers

-75 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001648110014
TypeChannel
Username@crypt_biznes
DescriptionTier 1 канал по заработку на крипте @zxcursed123321 - admin (по рекламе) 💬Chat - https://t.me/+xxMlgm_eZA81MjM6 ▶️YouTube - https://youtube.com/@cryptobiznes?si=OZG16wDZujOQYQ9v 👥 @tocatcrypto, @Arch1k3, @cryptojohans, @zefer_rzayev06
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/crypt_biznes

Growth

27,49527,57027,532.57 August 2026 — 27,570 subscribers7 August 2026 — 27,570 subscribers8 August 2026 — 27,552 subscribers9 August 2026 — 27,545 subscribers10 August 2026 — 27,533 subscribers11 August 2026 — 27,526 subscribers12 August 2026 — 27,507 subscribers13 August 2026 — 27,495 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -75. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,484–27,581 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 09:0627,495-12
12 Aug 2026, 09:5227,507-19
11 Aug 2026, 06:3127,526-7
10 Aug 2026, 05:0227,533-12
9 Aug 2026, 08:3127,545-7
8 Aug 2026, 08:4327,552-18
7 Aug 2026, 04:1527,570no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:0327,570first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.5%
avg views ÷ 27,495 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,720
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.782%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held24 (22 July 202613 August 2026)
Views total89,220
Reactions total698
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
5,730
Videos
184
Links
3,270

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

698 reactions across 24 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍26237.5%
😁14721.1%
8512.2%
🔥679.60%
👏334.73%
🐳213.01%
👌202.87%
🏆121.72%
😎91.29%
🌚81.15%
🕊81.15%
🎉60.86%
👀60.86%
🙏40.573%
🤔40.573%
🤩30.43%
❤‍🔥10.143%
💯10.143%
🥰10.143%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 698reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
89
across the posts below
Posts paid on
24
of 24 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @crypt_biznes. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 08:06 UTC≈1,190 views21 reactions2 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

gm

👍116🔥3🐳1

Signed Царевич

10 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC≈2,650 views29 reactions5 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

зачем так много 😃

😁185👍3🔥2🌚1

Signed Царевич

10 Aug 2026, 10:48 UTC≈2,820 views25 reactions5 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

+300$ на пиццу Все четко платят, а главное без ебучего 23% налога Делаем фастом пока весь пул не схавали - LINK

👍145🐳2🔥2😁2

Signed Царевич

10 Aug 2026, 07:34 UTC≈3,170 views25 reactions4 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

27-го не звоните

😁17👍4🔥3🎉1

Signed Царевич

5 Aug 2026, 20:37 UTC≈4,040 views36 reactions5 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

GRVT кстати дохуя насыпал😬

👍23🐳43🏆2👏2🔥2

Signed Царевич

5 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC≈3,780 views24 reactions4 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Клянись

👍14🌚42👀1👏1🔥1😎1

Signed Царевич

5 Aug 2026, 13:53 UTC≈3,640 views22 reactions4 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Забираем WL в стрипуху Вот и заанонсили запуск паблик сейла от StripChain (10м$ инвеста), недавно участвовали в тестнете от них, видимо тянуть ребята не собираются Команда будет использовать формат ITTC, то есть будет мин. порог цены для защиты от дампов, а прайс клейма токенов зависит от срока их удержания, другими словами чем дольше держишь, тем выгоднее условия. Info : ➖100% токенов будут разблокированы сразу

9😁6👍3🔥3🐳1

Signed Царевич

5 Aug 2026, 10:51 UTC≈3,450 views23 reactions3 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Через сутки дедлайн, последний шанс забрать халяву link чекаем все свои активные коши на eligible, в августе уже будем давать по стакану

👍12🔥4🤩32🏆2

Signed Царевич

5 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC≈3,550 views26 reactions3 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Успели подлутать норм тег? У меня @insta

👍166🐳2🔥2

Signed Царевич

4 Aug 2026, 14:09 UTC≈3,780 views30 reactions3 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

5.5$ тебе + 5.5$ за друга от NovaPay Фаст темка где каждый 18+ может получить 250 грн + 250 грн за друга, нужно всего пару мин времени Что делаем? 1. Регаемся 2. Проходим KYC (можно через дию) 3. Оформляем фиолетовую карту 4. Пополняем на 100+ грн 5. Делаем оплату на 100+ грн (можно просто счет пополнить) Кэш приходит почти сразу, время пройтись по друзьям и забрать на пиццу

👌20👍42🐳2👏1🔥1

Signed Царевич

4 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC≈3,560 views26 reactions3 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Топ насыпок в 2026 Не густо😬

👍17🔥43🙏2

Signed Царевич

4 Aug 2026, 07:35 UTC≈3,670 views25 reactions3 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Телега ночью откинулась ... Хронология произошедшего: ▪️ Мессенджер вдруг перестал отображаться в магазине Apple сразу во всех регионах, а по прямой ссылке выскакивала ошибка ▪️ Apple объяснила: приложение временно убрали после того, как на платформе нашли материалы, связанные с сексуальным насилием над детьми ▪️ В Telegram отреагировали быстро — контент удалили, пользователя заблокировали, после чего Apple вернула

👍14😁5🔥41👏1

Signed Царевич

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @crypt_biznes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@crypt_biznes edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
11 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 270,391 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Cryptobiznes” (@crypt_biznes), 27,495 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypt_biznes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.