Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for The Bitcoin

Channel

The Bitcoin

@TheBitcoin537

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

20,236subscribers

-295 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001513104671
TypeChannel
Username@TheBitcoin537
DescriptionFounded In 2022. Crypto Trading Signals with perfect strategies and high winrate. Website:- Thebitcoin537.com For Inquiry:- @Cryptboy37 Join Premium Through this bot:- @The_Bitcoin537_Premium_bot. Bot tutorial:- https://youtu.be/8kHCU9I-tN4?
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TheBitcoin537

Growth

20,23620,53120,383.57 August 2026 — 20,531 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,518 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,504 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,485 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,460 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,445 subscribers13 August 2026 — 20,411 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,382 subscribers16 August 2026 — 20,350 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,323 subscribers18 August 2026 — 20,288 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,268 subscribers20 August 2026 — 20,249 subscribers22 August 2026 — 20,236 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
14 measurements spanning 15 days, net -295. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,192–20,575 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 02:2820,236-13
20 Aug 2026, 17:2720,249-19
19 Aug 2026, 15:3820,268-20
18 Aug 2026, 18:4620,288-35
17 Aug 2026, 17:3720,323-27
16 Aug 2026, 14:0820,350-32
14 Aug 2026, 21:4520,382-29
13 Aug 2026, 15:1920,411-34
12 Aug 2026, 16:2420,445-15
11 Aug 2026, 14:5620,460-25
10 Aug 2026, 11:3420,485-19
9 Aug 2026, 09:5220,504-14
8 Aug 2026, 06:2120,518-13
7 Aug 2026, 09:0320,531first reading

Engagement

132 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.7%
avg views ÷ 20,236 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,370
127 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.956%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
132
of 132 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 126 of 127 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held132 (5 August 202622 August 2026)
Views total301,375
Reactions total2,850
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 21:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
9,100
Videos
84
Links
2,010

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

2,850 reactions across 126 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍85129.9%
79227.8%
🔥62121.8%
🥰58320.5%
😎30.105%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 126 of the 132 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,850reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 132 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 127 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TheBitcoin537. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 132 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 22 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 14:11 UTC≈1,490 views39 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

MCB Indicator gave Sell on $ETH 5m from top. All TPs✅✅.

👍149🔥8🥰8

Signed Moon .

22 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC≈1,790 views21 reactionsread 22 August 2026

LTF is too choppy to trade and share cleanly, so I'm staying out. — just waiting on a proper setup. We nailed most of these alt calls before the pump, so let's do a fresh update.

🔥8👍73🥰3

Signed Moon .

22 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC≈1,880 views20 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

According to CoinGlass data, In the past 24 hours, 290,643 traders were liquidated, the total liquidations comes in at $1.72 billion. The largest single liquidation order happened on Hyperliquid - BTC-USD value $24.96M.

7🥰5👍4🔥4

Signed Moon .

22 Aug 2026, 12:08 UTC≈2,180 views27 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🔥 BIG: BlackRock has bought $1.17B in $BTC and $ETH over the past two days, per Lookonchain. You usually see that kind of news when price has already pumped to create FOMO

12👍7🥰7🔥1

Signed Moon .

21 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC≈2,380 views33 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Claude AI POV on $BTC.

12🔥8🥰8👍5

Signed Moon .

21 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC390 views31 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

We were sharing good Spot Trades in our Spot Premium. Just because of this big move. Usually we share 2 trades per time but this time I was confident and shared 5-6 trades at once and all of them are in Huge Profits. 📈 $DOGE +22% 🚀 $ENS +29% 🚀 $BCH +26% 🚀 $HBAR +12% 🚀 $SUI +18% 🚀 Remember:- Spot Premium Channel is separate premium only for spot traders and one time fee only 99$ for lifetime. 💎 DM join:- @Cryptboy3

👍128🥰6🔥5

Signed Moon .

21 Aug 2026, 10:05 UTC≈2,230 views26 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🔥 UPDATE: High-conviction buyers have been accumulating $BTC since January, with this cycle's share of supply bought by that cohort even larger than in 2022, per Glassnode.

👍9🔥85🥰4

Signed Moon .

21 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC≈1,660 views25 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

JUST IN: $79,000 Bitcoin. $250 million worth of shorts liquidated and counting… 79k done. Maybe 81k is possible before sell off.

10🔥6🥰5👍4

Signed Moon .

21 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC286 views24 reactionsread 22 August 2026

This was posted few days ago that everything will pump sooner and it’s happening now (But it happened earlier that our expectations).

10🔥8👍5🥰1

Signed Moon .

21 Aug 2026, 08:57 UTC285 views30 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Poll

Are you enjoying this pump in Crypto?

  1. Yes 🙌35%
  2. No, because I’m in shorts and now in fear.29%
  3. No, because I didn’t buy anything in the dips.35%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🥰11🔥8👍74

Signed Moon .

21 Aug 2026, 08:56 UTC251 views23 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

In $ETH 📉 price did sweep first but then again breakout straight away without giving any confirmation for Short. 🚀

12🔥5🥰4👍2

Signed Moon .

21 Aug 2026, 08:55 UTC302 views37 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Price breakout straight away without any selling confirmation 🚀📈

17🔥9🥰7👍4

Signed Moon .

Showing the 12 most recent of 132 posts we hold for @TheBitcoin537. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Aug 2026, 08:57 UTCAnonymous Poll31 voters

Are you enjoying this pump in Crypto?

  1. Yes 🙌35%
  2. No, because I’m in shorts and now in fear.29%
  3. No, because I didn’t buy anything in the dips.35%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 132 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 22 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Infinity Signals
@Infinity_Crypto_Signals · 78,915
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The Bitcoin” (@TheBitcoin537), 20,236 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheBitcoin537.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.