Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net -606. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,780–17,568 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 13:40
16,871
-36
16 Sept 2026, 09:38
16,907
-16
14 Sept 2026, 16:41
16,923
-16
13 Sept 2026, 03:58
16,939
-27
11 Sept 2026, 06:20
16,966
-43
8 Sept 2026, 12:59
17,009
-57
5 Sept 2026, 05:36
17,066
-34
3 Sept 2026, 12:40
17,100
-14
2 Sept 2026, 10:03
17,114
-14
1 Sept 2026, 08:05
17,128
-9
31 Aug 2026, 10:43
17,137
-20
30 Aug 2026, 10:58
17,157
-11
29 Aug 2026, 11:05
17,168
-11
28 Aug 2026, 11:26
17,179
-7
27 Aug 2026, 14:38
17,186
-7
26 Aug 2026, 14:04
17,193
-14
25 Aug 2026, 11:42
17,207
-26
24 Aug 2026, 15:06
17,233
-13
22 Aug 2026, 23:42
17,246
-21
21 Aug 2026, 12:18
17,267
first reading
Engagement
113 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.35%
avg views ÷ 16,871 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,070
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.588%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 113 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
113 (2 August 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
21,416
Reactions total
126
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 09:29 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 11s
Average length
44s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
603 reactions across 108 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
387
64.2%
🔥
134
22.2%
🥰
17
2.82%
👏
15
2.49%
😁
14
2.32%
👌
11
1.82%
🤩
11
1.82%
🎉
9
1.49%
⚡
3
0.498%
👍
2
0.332%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 110 of the 113 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 603 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 113 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚨 JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Trump’s face is officially appearing on U.S. $1 coins.
The U.S. Mint says the 2026 President Donald J. Trump $1 coins are now in circulation and available for purchase through the Mint. They mark America’s 250th anniversary.
🚨 A NEW ERA AT APPLE 🍎
John Ternus officially takes over as Apple CEO, replacing Tim Cook after 15 years at the helm.
Cook becomes Executive Chairman, while Ternus brings 25 years of Apple experience into the top job.
🚀 Pump fun - Pehle Explore Karo, Trade Baad Mein
Crypto mein ho ya bilkul new ho, ek baar Pump fun ko samjho.
Coin buy/trade karne ki koi zarurat nahi hai.
Pehle account banao, platform explore karo, dekho coins kaise launch hote hain aur market kaise move karti hai.
Pump fun mein Zero se Hero bhi possible hai…
aur Hero se Zero bhi. 👀
Difference?
Knowledge + Timing + Risk Management.
👇 Join & explore
https://jo…
🚨 7 THINGS TO WATCH THIS WEEK
🇺🇸 U.S. Jobs Report - Friday
August jobs data could move Fed rate-cut expectations and trigger major volatility across BTC and stocks.
🇺🇸 ISM Manufacturing - Tuesday
A key read on U.S. economic strength and whether growth is cooling.
🇺🇸 ADP Jobs + Fed Beige Book - Wednesday
Fresh labor-market data alongside the Fed’s latest view of economic conditions.
🇺🇸 Services PMI + Jobless Claim…
CRYPTO JUST HAD A BIG WEEK.
5 things worth watching:
1. Bitcoin, Ethereum and Solana pushed higher, with BTC briefly breaking $81K while ETH and SOL reached multi-month highs.
2. Crypto investment products saw billions in fresh inflows, showing institutional demand is returning after weeks of weakness.
3. The SEC unveiled a major new crypto regulatory framework, proposing easier paths for crypto companies to rais…
❤8👏1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 113 posts we hold for @Todaycryptosignal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
👀 Bitcoin ETFs just posted their strongest weekly buying streak in 15 weeks.
Is institutional demand finally returning?
Yes 👍71%
No👎34%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 113 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Tek Baaz @TekBaaz · 23,863 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 September 2026
PushpendraSinghOfficial @pushpendrasinghofficial · 91,588 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 August 2026
Raghav’s Value Investing @raghavsvireal · 20,966 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 21 September 2026
WazirX Announcements @wazirx · 99,592 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
everything hindi @everythingajay · 45,161 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 August 2026
Crypto Universe @shivamcryptouniverse · 56,621 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
Bitcoin Expert India @bitcoinexpertindia · 38,552 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
Earn With Sapna @EarnWithSapna · 48,697 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
Crypto Notes @cryptoNotesMohsin · 50,803 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
Crypto India Haveli @OfficiaLCryptoindia · 58,182 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 August 2026
Crypto With Khan @startfromzerofamily · 44,114 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
Pushkar Raj Thakur Official @PushkarRajThakurOfficial · 213,451 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 August 2026
Reasoning by Akash Chaturvedi @ReasoningbyAkashChaturvedi · 33,335 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 4 September 2026
Crypto shubhrant Chaudhary @cryptoshubhrantchaudhary · 70,489 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026
Trading Copter @tradingcopter · 43,516 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 28 August 2026
Crypto Crown @cryptocrownofficial · 42,710 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 August 2026
CRYPTO AMAN @cryptoamanclub · 104,044 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
CoinDCX Announcements @CoinDCX_Announcements · 182,592 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 August 2026
Trader Pankaj Gupta @traderpankajgupta123 · 21,264 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 24 September 2026
CA Guru Ji @cagurujii · 29,294 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 8 September 2026
Tech Ranjan Official @techranjanofficial · 48,284 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 August 2026
ACEink by EB Capital Services @AceinkOfficial · 145,122 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Wise Advice Signal @wiseadvicebysumit · 170,339 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
Crypto Jargon @cryptojargon69 · 36,106 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 29 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TodayCrypto” (@Todaycryptosignal), 16,871 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Todaycryptosignal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.