$BTC is starting to show the true direction it’s planning to take over the next few months. We’re continuing to watch price slowly bleed, now dumping back below $73k earlier today, with each attempted bounce getting weaker and weaker. I think it’s becoming SIGNIFICANTLY more likely that we will see a retest of major macro support sitting around $65k-$67k, as these price targets are now ONLY about 10% away. This wo…

Channel
CryptoFrog's Gems 💎🐸
@CryptoFrogsGems
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
16,962subscribers
-1,097 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001496663342 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryptoFrogsGems |
| Description | Portal for all channels: https://t.me/CryptoFrogsPortal Private Networking lounge: @cryptopond Business Enquiries: @CryptoFrogPlays, @TPKFrogsGems & @EthCryptoFrog Instagram: @froginsiderig |
| Created | Between 1 October 2019 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryptoFrogsGems |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 13:16 | 16,962 | -28 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 17:31 | 16,990 | -19 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 06:01 | 17,009 | -12 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 23:31 | 17,021 | -22 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 21:56 | 17,043 | -17 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 19:20 | 17,060 | -14 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 15:54 | 17,074 | -8 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 14:26 | 17,082 | -9 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 16:40 | 17,091 | -9 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 15:28 | 17,100 | -12 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 12:17 | 17,112 | -14 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 10:08 | 17,126 | -8 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 10:48 | 17,134 | -11 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 12:35 | 17,145 | -5 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 15:46 | 17,150 | -9 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 15:56 | 17,159 | -21 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 13:58 | 17,180 | -5 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 11:44 | 17,185 | -22 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 09:44 | 17,207 | +3 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 04:07 | 17,204 | first reading |
Engagement
78 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 75 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 23.7%
- avg views ÷ 16,962 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 4,030
- 27 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 27
- of 78 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 78 (23 July 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 108,750 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 17:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,130
- Videos
- ≈350
- Links
- ≈4,280
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 2m 32s
- Average length
- 30s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 27 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
$BTC is in a very dangerous spot right now… 👀 We MUST see price push back above $76.2k to reclaim its prior lower high if we want to avoid a much bigger spill on the macro charts. And since price is struggling to see any sort of strong bounce here, it’s much more likely that we see the downside scenario play out. I’m seeing a lot of people on CT making bold predictions that we will head to new bear market lows, bu…
$BTC has begun to break down from its major support… Price has seen an absolutely NASTY liquidation event, with over $900 MILLION worth of long positions getting completely wiped out. Since then, price has begun attempting a bounce to reclaim $75k. If this move is nothing more than a deviation before heading higher, then we MUST see this level reclaimed with strength ASAP. If $75k is not reclaimed, it’s very likel…
$BTC is still holding on for dear life at these levels… The FINAL major level of support at $75k is still holding quite strong, but we have also seen $76k act as resistance, which has caused price to compress heavily between the two levels. This compression will likely result in a major liquidation event in either direction. However, with the lack of strong buying pressure around $76k, I have a feeling it’s going t…
$BTC has given up all its gains from yesterday’s rally… 😬 The last 24 hours of price action have possibly been the worst-case scenario for the bulls from a short term perspective. We saw a DISGUSTING rejection from the very important resistance level at $80k that I talked about yesterday. This rejection has now led to price capitulating all the way down to the very bottom of our final support level at $74.9k, whic…
$BTC has seen some MAJOR short term moves following the midterm elections last night! During voting, we saw price briefly wick down to retest our last major support level around $75k, before seeing a MAJOR move this morning. We have just seen price rally HARD directly into that $80k level of resistance that I’ve been keeping a close eye on. This level is EXTREMELY important for price to reclaim if the bulls want t…
$BTC is retesting $76k… This is a VERY IMPORTANT level for Bitcoin to hold over the next 24 hours, especially with all the bearish narratives being spread around about the midterms. We would like to see an IMMEDIATE bounce from this level, especially since the last retest of $76k also saw very little of a bounce. If we don’t hold $76k, I’m expecting $74.9k to be the last major level of support before heading all t…
Quick update on $BTC’s short term price action: Not much has changed since yesterday, as price is still holding above $76k, which remains the most important level of support we are currently watching. Until we see a breakdown below $76k or a break back above $80k, everything in between is just short term chop and volatility. Keep an EXTREMELY close eye on these levels as we head into the new week. I’d expect some …
$BTC is still attempting to hold $76k as support… 👀 Now that it’s the weekend, I highly doubt we will see much volatile price action in the short term, and the $76k support will likely hold until at least the weekly close tomorrow. Not much has changed since yesterday’s post, so I’ll keep this one short and to the point. $76k is the MOST IMPORTANT level of support right now. After that, it’s $74.9k. If both of the…
$BTC is still showing lots of short term weakness… Following my update yesterday, price has yet again failed to bounce and has come back down to retest its support at $76k. If we are unable to hold $76k, then $75k–$74.9k are the levels I’ll be watching next. If those fail to hold, we could see a dump anywhere between $70k and $65k… So I cannot stress enough just how important it is for price to hold strong above $…
$BTC has officially seen its short term breakdown… I’ve been talking about this potential move being very likely for many weeks now, and our first target has officially been hit. This move comes after reports that Binance was hacked for over $3 BILLION, which then led to this massive capitulation sell-off. Now that price has reached the mid-$70s, hitting our first target around $76k, I’m keeping a very close eye o…
MetaWin just hooked me up with a free $100 for you guys Deposit $100 on metawin.com and use my code CRYPTOFROG They’ll immediately double your deposit and give you an extra $100 You don’t have to KYC or anything This lasts for 24 hours so I’d probably go take advantage
Showing the 12 most recent of 78 posts we hold for @CryptoFrogsGems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@Bingonewschannel · 2751 postComma Calls Alpha
@CommaCallsAlpha · 661 postCryptoFrog's Degens
@CryptoFrogsDegens · 3,5911 postG28 Announcement
@G28announcement · 81 postRobo Inu Announcement
@RoboInuNews · 31 postYieldGem Announcements
@YieldGem · 51 postAILABS ANNOUNCEMENTS
@ailabsannouncements · 31 postEnigma Gaming
@enigmagam · 281 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@CoinMetaHubOfficial · 942 postsDaily Shill
@Martinshiller · 22 postsCallers Price List 📞
@callerpricelist · 961 postComma Calls Alpha
@CommaCallsAlpha · 661 postCryptoFrog’s Plays
@cryptofrogsplays · 671 postCryptoFrog's Portal (OFFICIAL TELEGRAM)
@CryptoFrogsPortal · 8151 postEnigma Gaming
@enigmagam · 281 postCOMBOT
@fgfccfggzzdfff · 41 postCryptoFrog's Gems Portal
@JoinCryptoFrogsGems · 8221 postPapasale - Announcements
@Papaecosystem_ann · 1,0191 postSHADOWMUSKCALL🤘
@SHADOWMUSKCALL · 291 postShiba Warriors Portal
@ShibaWarriorsPortal · 1761 postThunders Marketing (Web3)🌛
@thundersmarketing · 7561 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@cryptolyxecalls · 53,342
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
@GetAlphaShot · 23,868
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 16 September 2026
@kobascalls · 30,169
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 3 September 2026
@CryptoZinTrades · 38,854
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
@SHIFTERFREECALLS · 24,429
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 13 September 2026
@lyxedegen · 40,680
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
@wulfcryptocalls · 27,528
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 9 September 2026
@shmooscalls · 36,636
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026
@shmooscasino · 29,263
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 7 September 2026
@wallethuntersio · 22,909
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 16 September 2026
@Cryptocowboyx · 28,604
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 30 September 2026
@cryptomasun · 28,121
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 8 September 2026
@atecall · 18,385
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 2 October 2026
@bruiserscalls · 30,311
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 September 2026
@meraki · 21,311
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 September 2026
@ShinobiSignals · 31,064
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 4 September 2026
@degenwar · 22,635
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 17 September 2026
@MemeCoin_Whale_Pumps · 106,933
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 August 2026
@Caesars_Calls · 38,088
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 30 August 2026
@crypto_bobles · 47,193
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CryptoFrog's Gems 💎🐸” (@CryptoFrogsGems), 16,962 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoFrogsGems.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.