Channel
@CryptoFrogsGems
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
17,997subscribers
-62 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001496663342 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryptoFrogsGems |
| Description | Portal for all channels: https://t.me/CryptoFrogsPortal Private Networking lounge: @cryptopond Business Enquiries: @CryptoFrogPlays, @TPKFrogsGems & @EthCryptoFrog Instagram: @froginsiderig |
| Created | Between 1 May 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryptoFrogsGems |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:14 | 17,997 | -15 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:13 | 18,012 | -16 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:21 | 18,028 | -9 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 18,037 | -11 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:11 | 18,048 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:37 | 18,054 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 18,059 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:08 | 18,059 | first reading |
25 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (23 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 98,450 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 00:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Still expecting lower for $BTC in the short term… 👀 As we can see in the charts, price has clearly been forming a pretty strong downtrend over the past few days, which has yet to be broken. As long as we see price continue to stay below this downtrend line, expectations in the short term should still be lower. The next lower target to keep an eye on is around $62.5k. If we do break out from this downtrend, the fir…
$BTC is rejecting from the exact level I was expecting… 👀 As I’ve been talking about for over a week now, $BTC had rallied into a strong level of resistance at $65k, where we struggled to see buyers facilitate a strong breakthrough. This led to a very bearish divergence print on the RSI a few days ago, which I made a post about. I mentioned how buying momentum had slowed down heavily and the bears were beginning to…
$BTC is still failing to break above resistance on the short term… 👀 As I’ve been talking about for days now, $BTC is struggling to break above $65k, even with today’s “weekly close volatility,” which was much lower than most weeks. We still must see this level broken on both the short-term AND weekly charts to be confident in any macro continuation higher. Until this level is broken, it’s safe to assume this “cho…
We could be witnessing $BTC start to form a short term rejection here… 👀 As I’ve been talking about for the past few days now, $65k is an EXTREMELY strong level of resistance that price has clearly been struggling to break through. Now it’s clear that price is starting to reject, as we have also seen a strong bearish breakdown on the RSI, which shows that momentum is weakening heavily and the bears are starting to …
Let’s take a close look at developments on the $BTC weekly chart… 👀 As I’ve been mentioning for MONTHS now, to confirm that a bullish reversal is likely in play, we must see a STRUCTURAL shift in the market via $BTC reclaiming its prior BOS from June, sitting around $66k. Until that level is broken, any “predictions” about reversals are nothing more than speculation. With that being said, there are some positives f…
Holy shit one of you turned $3 into $20k today on MetaWin They just airdropped us $4M last month And today they announced they have another $1M going out to their players Everyone who deposits on metawin.com qualifies If you gamble, make sure you’re doing it there so you get your free $$
$BTC on the short term is still going exactly according to plan… 🤝 After retesting the $65k level of resistance, price is now slowly starting to reject from that level just as I’ve expected, which will likely result in a move back toward $62k-$61k in the short term. One thing I have noticed, though, is the brutal chop and lack of any strong volatility this week. In fact, this week has been one of the lowest volume …
$BTC has retested its first rejection zone just as I expected… 👀 Like I mentioned in yesterday’s post, after price broke above the short term downtrend that had been forming over the past few days, we’ve now seen price rally into the next level of resistance around $65k. This is a strong area where we could see some rejection trade setups, and so far, price looks like it wants to reject from this level. If we do m…
$BTC is seeing a nice short term breakout! 👀 As I talked about yesterday, Bitcoin was retesting its short term downtrend, and we were keeping a close eye out for either another rejection or a breakout into the next resistance levels. Now that we have seen price break above the downtrend with multiple candle closes, it’s safe to assume price will likely rally into its next short term resistance levels at $65k and $6…
$BTC is once again rejecting from its short-term downtrend… 👀 I’ve been talking about this short term downtrend for the past few days, and each retest so far has resulted in strong rejections back into support. Now we’re watching price retest this downtrend yet again, and so far it has struggled to break out. If we see another rejection from this point, it’s very likely Bitcoin will make another short term lower lo…
$BTC just closed a very bearish weekly candle… 👀 After Bitcoin closed its previous three weekly candles green, we have now seen all of those gains erased by last week’s weekly candle close just a few minutes ago. This comes after all three of those green weekly candles saw strong rejections from the heavy macro resistance between $65k-$67k, which has now resulted in the bearish weekly close we just saw. I wouldn’t…
$BTC is seeing a nice bounce here from support… 👀 We have started to see Bitcoin rally once again from its $62.5k support level. This rally also came following news from Trump claiming to have a “new deal” with Iran. Clearly, we have seen in the past that Trump claiming a deal is done has not always been accurate, so this rally could easily give back its gains if fighting resumes. But if this rally does continue, …
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @CryptoFrogsGems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 100,897 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CryptoFrog's Gems 💎🐸” (@CryptoFrogsGems), 17,997 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoFrogsGems.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.