Anyone from the U.S? Paid task is available. Dm me @wforwings
🐳36

Channel
@wingsscallss
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
17,027subscribers
-1,255 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002089230759 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wingsscallss |
| Description | All calls are NFA. Owner: @wings |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wingsscallss |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 15:58 | 17,027 | -14 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 02:19 | 17,041 | -17 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 17:59 | 17,058 | -12 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 15:56 | 17,070 | -11 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 16:35 | 17,081 | -12 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 15:46 | 17,093 | -18 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 12:09 | 17,111 | -20 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 10:36 | 17,131 | -16 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 07:37 | 17,147 | -10 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 09:15 | 17,157 | -14 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 10:04 | 17,171 | -17 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 06:46 | 17,188 | -13 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 01:08 | 17,201 | -15 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 03:46 | 17,216 | -6 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 01:29 | 17,222 | -7 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 04:48 | 17,229 | -8 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 08:06 | 17,237 | -17 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 08:41 | 17,254 | -8 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 06:36 | 17,262 | -20 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 21:56 | 17,282 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 1 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 72 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
345 reactions across 21 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐳 | 134 | 38.8% | |
| ❤ | 100 | 29.0% | |
| 🔥 | 66 | 19.1% | |
| 🥰 | 21 | 6.09% | |
| 😁 | 10 | 2.90% | |
| 👾 | 7 | 2.03% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 1.16% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.58% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.29% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 345 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 7 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @wingsscallss. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 July 2026 to 7 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Anyone from the U.S? Paid task is available. Dm me @wforwings
🐳36
GM been inactive for a while here, I am just taking some time to chill until bulls are back
🐳39
July 6th I will be the most viral person in X for being the first one to call the coin 🔜
🐳36❤11🔥3
The wise do not wait for the harvest to begin — they prepare the soil in silence. 🤫🔜 July 6th
🐳20❤7🔥6
Or more like good afternoon 😭
❤11😁5
GM GM 🐂
🥰7😁1
Whatsoever a man desireth, it standeth ready for his taking. All that his soul craveth shall be his. July 6th 🔜
🔥20❤4👍4
🗣️ Market sentiment is slowly healing, big opportunities to start appearing. Sentiment never lies, it’s the human emotion that marks how much retail liquidity is going to be poured into markets 📈
❤7
👀
❤18
GM ☀️
🔥4
As many of you know trenches are getting hot. I have came across an opportunity that happens once in a long time
❤11😁4
🗣️ Stay tuned. Huge announcement tomorrow 🔜
🔥5❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @wingsscallss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
We recorded 1 post on @wingsscallss as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 87 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Wings Calls” (@wingsscallss), 17,027 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wingsscallss.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.