Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Markas Trader

@Markas_Trader

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

32,035subscribers

-70 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002034086001
TypeChannel
Username@Markas_Trader
DescriptionCP: @JanePutra *TIDAK ADA VIP BERBAYAR & TIDAK ADA TITIP DANA! *DISCLAIMER: Channel ini bersifat informasi dan bukan merupakan tawaran atau ajakan untuk menjual dan membeli aset apapun. Perdagangan aset digital merupakan aktivitas beresiko tinggi.
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Markas_Trader

Growth

32,03532,11132,0737 August 2026 — 32,105 subscribers7 August 2026 — 32,105 subscribers7 August 2026 — 32,111 subscribers8 August 2026 — 32,099 subscribers9 August 2026 — 32,076 subscribers10 August 2026 — 32,070 subscribers11 August 2026 — 32,054 subscribers12 August 2026 — 32,035 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 5 days, net -70. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,024–32,122 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 17:4632,035-19
11 Aug 2026, 14:5532,054-16
10 Aug 2026, 16:5232,070-6
9 Aug 2026, 19:0232,076-23
8 Aug 2026, 16:0732,099-12
7 Aug 2026, 19:0432,111+6
7 Aug 2026, 15:3032,105no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:2232,105first reading

Engagement

41 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.3%
avg views ÷ 32,035 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,220
41 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
41
of 41 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held41 (6 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total213,920
Reactions total7,308
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 21:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
11,300
Videos
93
Links
1,470

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

7,308 reactions across 41 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2,13929.3%
2,10228.8%
🐳1,04514.3%
🙏1,01613.9%
🏆99013.5%
🥰70.096%
👍40.055%
🫡30.041%
❤‍🔥10.014%
👏10.014%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,308reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC≈4,230 views162 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

AUD/USD [#Forex] Swing Trade Sell Limit SL 35 pips Target 150 pips 👉 Buat Akun Forex 👉 Join Grup Markas Forex @Markas_Trader

🔥5452🏆19🐳19🙏15❤‍🔥1👏1🫡1

12 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC≈4,960 views169 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

udah kaya belum?

52🔥49🙏30🐳22🏆16

12 Aug 2026, 06:08 UTC≈5,270 views173 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

NEWS CPI

  1. BUY60%
  2. SELL43%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

51🔥42🏆32🙏27🐳21

12 Aug 2026, 06:08 UTC≈5,230 views174 reactionsread 12 August 2026

okeeehh, meskipun gak seramai news kemarin, coba kita test ombak

59🔥52🙏25🏆24🐳14

11 Aug 2026, 14:54 UTC≈5,290 views171 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

UPDATE $ZEN its a prank !! SNIP SNIP RUNNING 5% @Markas_Trader

57🔥36🐳30🙏25🏆23

11 Aug 2026, 14:53 UTC≈5,340 views152 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Kena juga, makasih min🤝🏻

47🔥40🙏24🏆22🐳19

11 Aug 2026, 14:52 UTC≈4,960 views176 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Makasih banyak min 👍✅✅ Yang NZD kemarin tergantikan 👍

60🔥47🐳24🙏23🏆22

11 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC≈4,860 views164 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

OUTLOOK $ONDO @Markas_Trader

🔥4942🙏28🏆24🐳21

11 Aug 2026, 14:48 UTC≈4,850 views165 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

OUTLOOK $ETH @Markas_Trader

🔥5751🐳30🙏16🏆9🥰2

Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @Markas_Trader. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Aug 2026, 06:08 UTCAnonymous Poll638 voters

NEWS CPI

  1. BUY60%
  2. SELL43%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

7 Aug 2026, 11:38 UTCAnonymous Poll560 voters

NFP

  1. BUY57%
  2. SELL46%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

6 Aug 2026, 20:50 UTCAnonymous Poll489 voters

NFP

  1. Buy only47%
  2. Sell keras56%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Airdrop Finder
@airdropfind · 557,848
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 9 August 2026
WhaleBot Alerts 🐳
@whalebotalerts · 146,502
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Markas Trader” (@Markas_Trader), 32,035 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Markas_Trader.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.