Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ФК «Оренбург»

@fcorenburg

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

18,471subscribers

-13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001591281652
TypeChannel
Username@fcorenburg
DescriptionОфициальный канал ФК «Оренбург» Билеты: http://tickets.fcorenburg.ru РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/67af31516b227f444695b785 #XQ9ML
Created4 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fcorenburg

Growth

18,46518,48618,475.56 August 2026 — 18,484 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,486 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,476 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,465 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,475 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,474 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,471 subscribers18,4716 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 7 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,462–18,489 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 18:4318,471-3
10 Aug 2026, 20:1718,474-1
9 Aug 2026, 21:1318,475+10
8 Aug 2026, 21:1718,465-11
7 Aug 2026, 21:1118,476-10
7 Aug 2026, 00:4518,486+2
6 Aug 2026, 03:0318,484first reading

Engagement

66 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.7%
avg views ÷ 18,471 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,720
66 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
66
of 66 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held66 (5 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total179,321
Reactions total3,239
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 00:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
8,760
Videos
3,100
Links
2,520

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4m 25s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,044 reactions across 61 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,12336.9%
❤‍🔥36011.8%
custom 535517154199682729632110.5%
🔥2718.90%
🤣2307.56%
😢1524.99%
🤬1133.71%
👍1123.68%
🙏812.66%
🥴802.63%
😐341.12%
🤯311.02%
300.986%
🎉250.821%
😁240.788%
👏140.46%
😍130.427%
💔80.263%
🕊60.197%
🤨50.164%
5 further kinds110.361%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 66 of the 66 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,239reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 66 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC≈1,520 views31 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @orbmerchPhoto

Все гениальное — просто: мы проанализировали спрос на базовую коллекцию среди наших болельщиков и решили выпустить 4 вида футболок! Какой из вариантов нравится больше всего? 📍 Магазин болельщика 🖥 Интернет-магазин 💙 Магазин ВКонтакте

🤯12👍8❤‍🔥53🤣2🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC≈1,840 views118 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Есть такая профессия — ворота защищать! 🧤 Накидаем ❤️ нашим вратарям! #ФКОренбург

93❤‍🔥128🔥2😍2🎉1

12 Aug 2026, 05:31 UTC≈2,220 views80 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Доброе утро, Оренбург!☀️ Встречаемся в пятницу на «Газовике»! #ФКОренбург

custom 535517154199682729661🔥9❤‍🔥72👍1

11 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC≈2,630 views136 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Бага снова в деле! 💪🏼 Возможно, вы могли упустить это невероятное спасение Овсянникова — так вот, показываем! ❤️ — сейв тура! #ФКОренбург

122❤‍🔥5🤯5🔥2😍2

11 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC≈2,530 views63 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

😍Твои эмоции, когда следующий матч любимой команды уже через 3️⃣ дня! БИЛЕТЫ НА «ЛОКОМОТИВ» #ФКОренбург

44custom 535517154199682729610❤‍🔥7🔥2

11 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTC≈2,380 views28 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @matchpremierPoll

ЦЕНТРАЛЬНЫЙ ПОЛУЗАЩИТНИК

  1. Маринкин. «Динамо»63%
  2. Болотов. «Оренбург»40%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

custom 535517154199682729624🤣31

11 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC≈2,700 views33 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

РОЗЫГРЫШ БИЛЕТОВ 🎫 Разыгрываем 2️⃣0️⃣ билетов на домашний матч против «Локомотива»! Переходи в нашу группу во «ВКонтакте» и принимай участие! #ФКОренбург

30🤣3

11 Aug 2026, 05:55 UTC≈2,740 views96 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥6712custom 53551715419968272969😍6❤‍🔥1🤣1

10 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC≈2,910 views38 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Галерея игры с «Рубином» 📸 Полный альбом по ссылке: https://clck.su/Myjwj #ФКОренбург

❤‍🔥3071

10 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC≈2,580 views55 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Реакция нашей скамейки на гол Ценова в ворота «Рубина» 😍 БИЛЕТЫ НА «ЛОКОМОТИВ» #ФКОренбург

44custom 53551715419968272965❤‍🔥3🔥21

10 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC≈2,700 views56 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Пресс-конференция Ильдара Ахметзянова после матча #РубинОренбург Читайте на нашем сайте: clck.ru/3VAWmu БИЛЕТЫ НА МАТЧ С «ЛОКОМОТИВОМ» #ФКОренбург

custom 535517154199682729641👏95🔥1

10 Aug 2026, 04:04 UTC≈2,840 views79 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

«Если мы хотим выигрывать, надо добавлять!» Слова главного тренера сразу после матча. БИЛЕТЫ НА ДОМАШНИЙ МАТЧ С «ЛОКОМОТИВОМ» #ФКОренбург

🔥56custom 535517154199682729613👍72❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 66 posts we hold for @fcorenburg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@fcorenburg edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTCFinal Results8,140 voters approx.

ЦЕНТРАЛЬНЫЙ ПОЛУЗАЩИТНИК

  1. Маринкин. «Динамо»63%
  2. Болотов. «Оренбург»40%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

8 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTCAnonymous Poll470 voters

Из коллекции «Европа-Азия» больше нравится

  1. Европа72%
  2. Азия28%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 66 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 19,008 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Justin Cuero (en.wikipedia.org)
“…[[Independiente del Valle]].{{cite web|publisher=FC Orenburg|url=https://t.me/fcorenburg/12054|title=Джастин Куэро продолжит карьеру в "Индепендьенте дель…”
read 9 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ФК «Оренбург»” (@fcorenburg), 18,471 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fcorenburg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.