3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,263–2,265 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 02:31
2,263
-1
8 Aug 2026, 04:03
2,264
-1
7 Aug 2026, 16:47
2,265
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
30.8%
avg views ÷ 2,263 subscribers
Avg views / post
697
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
20 (1 August 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
13,934
Reactions total
349
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 16:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
349 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
114
32.7%
😁
99
28.4%
❤
91
26.1%
👍
29
8.31%
👏
9
2.58%
🏆
3
0.86%
😎
3
0.86%
🤬
1
0.287%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 349reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🏴х ⚽ Астон Вилла — Бавария
Бавария выглядит хорошечно в предсезонном турне. Веселятся, отгружают Роттаху-Эгерну 15 голешников, пробуют молодежь в бою. Астон Вилла продала Юри Тилеманса, своего лучшего игроки и взяла себе головную боль в виде Алехандро Гарначо. Банда Эмери можно сказать пересобирается и сейчас сыгранность далеко не самая лучшая.
Верю в победу Баварии и в голевую феерию. Беру тотал голов мюнхен…
🐃х💚 Краснодар — Ахмат
Не верю, что матч закончится без забитых голов. Краснодар сделал выводы, после того как Факел почти устроил им ремонтаду, и сейчас действуют более сконцентрировано. Во втором тайме должны дожимать Ахмат.
Беру победу хозяев в основное время за кэф 2️⃣⏺️3️⃣0️⃣
🔥 Друзья, надеюсь вы не забыли, что сегодня еще одна порция матчей Кубка России будет
Ждете где-нибудь сенсацию? Может Факел Динамо обыграет, например. А на победу Балтики вообще кэф 9️⃣⏺️0️⃣0️⃣ дают.
🏆 Экспресс на Кубок России — погнали!
Акрон и Родина, думаю, слишком сосредоточены, чтобы в лучшую лигу мира в конце сезона не улететь, поэтому вряд ли сильно убиваться в Кубке будут. Грузану здесь уверенно на победы Ростова и Рубина.
А Махачкала с Крыльями неплохо сезончик начали. Но есть чуйка, что будут слишком осторожничать, да и Махачкала может спокойно закрыться дома, затем один шальной заковырять и всё. На О…
🏆🎉 Что может быть лучше футбольчика на выходных? Только футбольчик в будние дни!
Уже сегодня групповой этап в Кубке России стартует, если что.
Собрать тебе экспрессик сегодня или по матчам двигаться будем? Че думаешь?
🦬x🗽 Велес — Ротор
Возвращаемся к лучшей лиги мира! Слушай, у нас тут заруба: Велес и Ротор набрали одинаковое количество очков, но вайб у команд вообще разный. Москвичи после двух побед подряд жестко огребли в Красноярске — 1:4, мощный тильт, короче. А волгоградцы, наоборот, поймали кураж: две сухих победы подряд.
Возьму победу Ротора — кэф 2️⃣⏺️0️⃣4️⃣ можно забрать у наших друзей из WINLINE!
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @previewin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WINLINE Превью” (@previewin), 2,263 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/previewin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.