Channel
@enochmemos
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,941subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002485558287 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @enochmemos |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/enochmemos |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 2,941 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:32 | 2,946 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:20 | 2,946 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (8 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,684 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 00:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
정말 도움을 요청드리고 싶어 이렇게 올립니다. 정말 무거운 마음으로 이 글을 올리게됩니다. 저희 아버지는 대형회사에서 IT담당 임원으로 계십니다. 메모리가격 인상에 따라 계약을 재체결하는 과정에서 높은가격으로 재 계약을 진행하는 과정에서 제대로 이전 계약 마무리가 제대로 되지 못하고 진행이됨과 함께 최종 결재자가 되시면서 감사에서 계속해서 회사에 수백억에 가까운 손해를 입혔다고 압박을 받으시는것 같습니다. 결론이 나지 않았지만 수백억을 추징을 당할 수 있다는 압박감에… 좋지못한 선택을 시도하셨습니다. 혹시 이와관련하여 상담을 할 수 있거나 관련 전문가를 알고 계신분이 있다면 지나치치지마시고 한번만이라도 조언을 주시면 너무나도 감사하겠습니다. 제가 지금 당장 못하더라도 꼭 평생에 걸쳐서라도 보은하겠습니다
애플신고가..
JUST IN: Apple $AAPL reaches new all-time high of $333, surpassing $4.9 trillion market cap. @WatcherGuru
🎂 펏지펭귄 올해로 5살 5년간의 행보 톺아보기 • 2021년 7월 22일 8,888개 NFT 완판 • Luca Netz 인수 후 브랜드 부활 및 리브랜딩 성공 • Pudgy Toys 출시 • Walmart 3,000개 이상 매장 입점 • Amazon 및 글로벌 리테일 유통망 진출 • Pudgy World 출시 (Web2와 Web3를 연결하는 디지털 플랫폼) • 누적 NFT 거래량 수억 달러 달성 • Abstract Layer 2 블록체인 생태계 구축 • PENGU 토큰 출시 및 주요 거래소 상장 • Manchester City, Visa/KAST, PlayMonster, Kakawow 등 글로벌 브랜드와 협업 • NFT 프로젝트를 글로벌 캐릭터 IP 브랜드로 성공적으로 확장 5년 뒤에 10주년 기념으로 글을 쓸때는 더…
하이퍼리퀴드의 뼈대가 된 텐더민트(Tendermint) 의 창시자 Jae Kwon 이 만든 신규 레이어1 프로젝트, Gno.land가 지금 퍼블릭 세일 진행 중입니다. 현재 오픈한 지 3일 만에 벌써 모금액 100만 달러를 넘은 상태이며, 어제까지는 보너스가 15%였고, 오늘부터는 10% 를 추가로 배정받을 수 있는 구간이라고 합니다. 💡 핵심 요약 • 추가 보너스: 오늘부터 참여 시 GNOT 10% 추가 배정 • 최소 참여 금액: 최소 $100부터 가능 • 일정: 2026년 9월 TGE(토큰 생성 이벤트) 예정으로 비교적 빠른 토큰 수령 가능 • 토큰 가격 및 밸류에이션: 시작가 $0.0645 / 시작가 기준 FDV 약 $8,600만 • 결제 수단: 이더리움 메인넷 USDC·USDT 누적 모금액이 150만 달러를 넘어가면 보너스가…
펏쥐 팽귄과 Kakawow와의 파트너쉽 https://x.com/pudgypenguins/status/2077426261127823491?s=46&t=oeMcOtn2ZCZ8Ysr-XAov5g kakawow는 마블, 디즈니, 해리포터 등 다양한 라이센스를 받아 컬렉티블 카드를 출시하는 브랜드인데 높은 퀄리티의 카드로 인기가 많은 브랜드입니다 이번에 펏지팽귄과 협업하여 펏쥐팽귄 컬렉티블 카드를 출시했네요. 특이한건 루카같은 네임드 펏지 팽귄 뿐만 아니라 커뮤니티 멤버들의 펏쥐 팽귄도 포함되어 있다는점. 추가로 PSA, SGC, CGC 등의 전문 평가기관들로부터 공식 평가를 받을 수 있습니다. 이번에 200개에 한해 DYLI에서도 어제 세일을 진행했는데 아주 빠르게 매진되었네요. 현재는 110불대에 가격이 형성되어 있는 중
안녕하세요! t54 랩스의 공식 한국어 텔레그램 채널입니다. t54 랩스 채널 살펴보기 ✅t54 랩스 한국어 텔레그램: https://telegram.me/t54ai_Korea ✅t54 랩스 한국어 블로그: https://blog.naver.com/t54ai_kr ✅t54 랩스 X(영문): https://x.com/t54ai 영문 X 콘텐츠의 경우 번역본은 해당 채널을 통해 공지가 될 예정입니다. 앞으로 많은 관심 부탁 드립니다!
[안내] UPBIT x GIWA 빌더 성장지원 프로그램 <GASOK(가속)> 에 참여해 보세요! 🔗 공지사항 확인하기
저에겐 매우매우 달달했던 실사용과 에어드랍을 챙겨줬던 프로젝트였습니다 실제 사이퍼 팀원들도 만나고 대표도 만나서 이야기도 해본 팀이라 더 아쉬움이 많이 남네요 다만 사실 TGE 이후 프로토콜 운영 쪽에서 뭔가 재밌는걸 만들어내지 못한건 사실이긴 해요 저의 첫 크립토 카드였던 싸이퍼도 사업을 접고.. 요즘 왜이리 사업 접는 곳들이 많나요 참
❤1
9개월전 TGE를 했던 싸이퍼 카드가 Nium에게 인수당하며 $CYPR가 88% 급락... TGE때 기준 99%가 넘는 하락이라고 합니다. 잘보니 시총이 3.3만불이네 😊 아아.. 토큰이란 무엇일까... https://x.com/i/status/2075136243738853403
4663 GME 따잇 완료
🥰1
4663 이 GME 따잇하는 순간까지 얼마 안남은듯요
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @enochmemos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,068,377 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“오리 이노치 리써치 (스폰서환영)” (@enochmemos), 2,941 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/enochmemos.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.