Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
65 measurements spanning 98 days, net +1,577. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,480–31,587 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 14:50
31,300
-15
10 Nov 2026, 12:50
31,315
-2
8 Nov 2026, 22:21
31,317
-5
7 Nov 2026, 14:19
31,322
+3
6 Nov 2026, 11:05
31,319
-4
5 Nov 2026, 11:46
31,323
-8
4 Nov 2026, 11:07
31,331
-9
3 Nov 2026, 10:55
31,340
-4
2 Nov 2026, 10:58
31,344
+18
1 Nov 2026, 07:28
31,326
+25
31 Oct 2026, 06:28
31,301
-9
30 Oct 2026, 02:58
31,310
+15
29 Oct 2026, 03:16
31,295
+6
28 Oct 2026, 04:39
31,289
-9
27 Oct 2026, 03:07
31,298
+20
26 Oct 2026, 00:56
31,278
+29
24 Oct 2026, 21:39
31,249
+20
23 Oct 2026, 21:28
31,229
+6
22 Oct 2026, 23:44
31,223
+18
21 Oct 2026, 23:30
31,205
first reading
Engagement
154 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 168 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.1%
avg views ÷ 31,300 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,160
50 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
50
of 154 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
154 (4 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
158,180
Reactions total
1,662
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 23:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,470
Videos
≈1,240
Links
≈942
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
47m 14s
Average length
39s
Measured directly from 73 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,995 reactions across 150 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
5,995
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 154 of the 154 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,130 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 154 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 50 posts held from the last 30 days (4.00%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Интересный подход, как можно генерировать вещи\образы без людей в разных позах - по рефам поз
Рубрика промпт дня #промпт_дня_nc
Генерировал на сайте агрегатора Syntx в GPT Image 2.5
Подгружайте картинку\фотографию с одеждой, а также картинку с нужной позой.
Позы сделал специально на серых нейтральных фигрках, что бы при генерации не было смешивания.
Подборку из 30 поз и промпт скинул в коменты 👇
▶️Присоединяйся …
Claude запретили даже релокантам из российских компаний: Anthropic обновили политику доступа.
Доступ к Claude запрещен компаниям, которые зарегистрированы в России и других неподдерживаемых странах. Их сотрудникам тоже нельзя, даже если те живут в Грузии или Казахстане.
Сотрудник американской компании также не может пользоваться Claude, пока находится в России. Ограничения касаются приложений, Claude Code, API и до…
Как создавать реалистичных аватаров\персонажей\ии-людей\блогеров с помощью последних инструментов нейросетей
Ребят, завтра провожу большой эфир, на котором разберу и покажу все подходы по созданию иишных аватаров, новые инструменты, а также генерации с русской озвучкой, без озвучки, генерации под песни и тренды с реалистичным персонажем.
Подготовил кучу примеров, сравнений. Промпты, доп материалы всё будет.
Спойле…
Ну всё, Фотошоп сдался
Сейчас проходит конференция Adobe Max. Показывают обновы их программ.
Но из самого интресного, они официально выпускают MCP и теперь можно подключить Фотошоп и другие их программы к Claude или ChatGPT.
Получается что теперь Фотошоп, Иллюстратор и другие адобовские программы теперь не только для профикоф, но и для любого залётного, кто умеет пользоваться клодом.
А ещё в них теперь можно подк…
Прикольный видос с переодевашками в лифте
Рубрика промпт дня #промпт_дня_nc
Генерировал на сайте агрегатора Syntx в Seedance 2.5
Подгружайте фото человека, 4 образа одежды и обязательно образы отмечайте в промпте через @
Промпт закинул в коменты т.к он на 2 километра👇
▶️Присоединяйся в клуб нейротворцов
Тут Openai выкатили оф гайд, по генерации изображений в их последней моделе GPT Image 2.6 (она по умолчанию генерит картинки в ChatGPT).
Не сказать что там есть что-то вау, но есть моментики по разнице генераций в моделях Flare и Sunburst, редактировании картинок и переодевании людей.
Для общего развития можно и самим ознакомиться или скормить страницу GPT или Claude, пусть учаться ребята.
Гайд тут - https://devel…
Аааа, Инстаграм добавил платные подписки на свои функции
Инстаграм подсмотрел у Телеграм, что у того есть тариф Премиум и выкатил подписку Meta One (в этой подписке есть 4 уровня подписок, отличие только в наборе плюшек).
Что предлагают за деньги:
- расширенная статистика по конкурентам
- расширенная статистика историй
- улучшенная поддержка
- защита авторства контента
- улучшенный профиль (пока хз что это за вип л…
Google выкатили обновлённую версию своего видеогенератора Omni 1.2 Flash
Из интересного:
• видео генерит до 15 секунд
• улучшили сохранность персонажей, липсинк
• генерит в 720p, а вот 1080 и 4К это апскейл
Уже достпно во Flow или во всех агрегаторах, по типу Syntx или Higgsfield.
На самом деле за свои небольшие деньги, это неплохой генератор видосов
Видимо началось мракобесие с блокировками аккаунтов и у ChatGPT
Люди начали массово жаловаться, что ChatGPT начал блокировать их аккаунты без объяснения причины. Аппеляция не помогает, её просто отклоняют.
При этом теряется доступ ко всем чатам - вот это самое печальное, когда пропадает несколько лет работы.
Люди грешат, что блокают из-за использования VPN, но подтверждения этому нет. Сами OpenAI причины не называ…
«Именно так выглядит востребованная профессия в 2026 году» - бляяя, ну сколько можно
Ребят, пожалуйста, ну не ведитесь вы на эти хрени простого заработка - кнопку нажал, денег заработал.
Во всякие чудо боты, которые бабки вам зарабатывают. Ну вроде уже все понимают, как работают нейронки.
Нейросети - это не банкомат для ленивых
А если у вас не премиум, то вы видите всякую всратую рекламу заработка на нейронках вн…
Instagram выкатил свой видеоредактор Edits для компьтера и он полностью бесплатный
Из интересного:
• есть поддержка MCP т.е вы можете подключать туда агентов и нейронки
• готовые ролики можно сразу публиковать из редактора в Instagram
• неплохой базовый набор инструментов - многодорожечный таймлайн, ключевые кадры, продвинутую цветокоррекцию с кривыми и цветовыми колёсами, поддержку собственных LUT, работу со звуком…
Подборка промптов для классного фотосета
Рубрика промпт дня #промпт_дня_nc
Генерировал на сайте агрегатора Syntx в Seedream 5 Pro
Подгружайте своё фото и вводите промпты
В БЕЛОЙ ШУБЕ:
the person in the attached reference image, regardless of gender, 35mm film street-fashion editorial, low-angle mid shot looking up at them, one hand raised resting on top of
their head, the hard midday sun flaring directly behind the…
❤34
Showing the 12 most recent of 154 posts we hold for @belyakAi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@belyakAi named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@image3 named in 2 posts, 4 November 2026 – 5 November 2026
@video named in 2 posts, 26 September 2026 – 29 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Нейроконцентрат | нейросети, технологии @AIConcentrate · 30,576#1
Руслан Гамзатов | AI маркетинг @AIGamzatov · 33,948#2
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ananian.ai @ai_scince · 19,106 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 2 October 2026
Нейроконцентрат | нейросети, технологии @AIConcentrate · 30,576 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 6 September 2026
NEIROSETKIN @neirosetkin · 19,883 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 September 2026
Арон Закрия @aironzak · 117,771 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 September 2026
Егор Кузьмин XR @EgorKuzminxr1 · 21,506 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 September 2026
Руслан Гамзатов | AI маркетинг @AIGamzatov · 33,948 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026
Киселёва тут | AI • режиссура • портфолио @kiselevatut · 22,916 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 September 2026
НейроНатали | Обучение Нейросетям @Neyronatali · 20,504 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 September 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 8 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Беляк про нейросети” (@belyakAi), 31,300 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/belyakAi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.