Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
59 measurements spanning 96 days, net +344. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,420–12,903 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 02:28
12,847
+7
9 Nov 2026, 11:19
12,840
+4
8 Nov 2026, 00:36
12,836
+23
6 Nov 2026, 21:26
12,813
+49
5 Nov 2026, 23:58
12,764
+198
4 Nov 2026, 23:08
12,566
-7
3 Nov 2026, 20:50
12,573
-20
2 Nov 2026, 18:28
12,593
-7
1 Nov 2026, 18:26
12,600
+8
31 Oct 2026, 21:40
12,592
+3
30 Oct 2026, 20:39
12,589
+4
29 Oct 2026, 18:48
12,585
-3
27 Oct 2026, 22:25
12,588
+6
26 Oct 2026, 19:18
12,582
+6
25 Oct 2026, 16:11
12,576
-8
24 Oct 2026, 16:39
12,584
-1
23 Oct 2026, 15:45
12,585
-3
22 Oct 2026, 14:46
12,588
-9
21 Oct 2026, 09:39
12,597
-3
20 Oct 2026, 09:36
12,600
first reading
Engagement
47 posts held, back to 21 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.5%
avg views ÷ 12,847 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,120
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 47 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
47 (21 May 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
35,977
Reactions total
688
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 20:26 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
741
Videos
199
Links
476
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
3h 55m
Average length
39m 12s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,453 reactions across 47 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
1,049
42.8%
❤
615
25.1%
👍
308
12.6%
🎉
159
6.48%
❤🔥
91
3.71%
😍
72
2.94%
custom 5442647901123675836
50
2.04%
⚡
42
1.71%
👏
19
0.775%
🍾
18
0.734%
💯
16
0.652%
👌
5
0.204%
🏆
4
0.163%
😎
3
0.122%
🍓
1
0.041%
💋
1
0.041%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,453 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1,577
across the posts below
Posts paid on
45
of 47 we hold a reading for · 96%
Most on one post
128
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @maya_pro. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 47 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 May 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 17 posts held from the last 30 days (29.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🥹 Спасибо за поддержку первого видео. За такую поддержку хочется писать видео - если будет больше поддержки будет больше видео - договор ?
GrokBot - Эпизод 2: ВАЙБВОРКИНГ - это не вайбкодинг !
Я люблю ваши комментарии под видео в ютубе и одни из первых был такого рода :
Артур, заканчивай... Ты уже не конкурентоспособен. Сожми пирожочки свои и признай это.
Спасибо ❤️ От души прям. Зажгло. Честно ничего не мотивиру…
Я просто оставлю это тут. теперь сами. Мой сервис на Бегете 🫨 был уничтожен как и сотни тысяч сервисов других людей.
Потому вот вам то что осталось - приятного использования 🥲
Ха - думали я больше видео не буду выпускать ? а вот и нет ...
GrokBot - Эпизод 1: Кто ещё такое может ?
Так в видео я даю лайфхаки на стартовый уровень, многое начало всплывать в голове после записи, но я ленивый потом переписывать не стал, вставлю во второе видео. С вас лайки, комментарии - и тогда второе видео с продолжением настройки... ну также может у вас вопросиков появиться я во втором видео это вставлю ❤️…
У НАС ЕСТЬ МАЛЕНЬКАЯ ПРОБЛЕМА В КАНАЛЕ 😁
Я ещё не отгрузил не одного видоса про GrokBot и многие его в глаза не видели и думают что Артур дичь какую-то толкает. Вот вам выпал шанс в прямом эфире посмотреть на меня красивого 😁, ну и чем другие заниматься. Ставлю что там про КЛОДКОД С КОДЕКСОМ расскажут... вы же любите такое, но а я покажу реальный инструмент 🥸 Посмотрим по реакции, как обычно.
ПРИГЛАШАЮ НА ЮБИЛЕЙНЫЙ…
РАБОТА ВОСТАНОВЛЕНА 🚨
Таксс, ну что сказать пару часов и мы с ГрокБотом после подъёма сайта, восстановили кривой бекап сайта, запустили переобходы на всех поисковиках, теперь всё хорошо, дальше арендовали новый VPS, развернули платёжного бота, переоформили платёжного бота, добавили вкусняшек, переадресации, клоудфейр, новый домен для приложения, новое приложение, https, и все взаимосвязи. Бррр - я бы в соло это неде…
PR Агент GrokBOT - за работой ❤️
Об этом я рассказал в голосовом посте выше. Ну вкратце тут показано как агент сам находит журналистов даёт свои ответы и тд. БОМБОЧКА для прокачки личного бренда или компании. 🚨🚨🚨
Забрать всех можно тут https://telegram.me/tribute/app?startapp=shMy пока только тут так как все сервисы мои на бегете и они пока спят )
Так как сервис Beget упал ( по непреодолимым обстоятельствам) а на нём стояли мои сайты и инфраструктура, в клуб попасть щас можно только через Tribute. https://telegram.me/tribute/app?startapp=shMy
Ждём восстановления .... А я только сделал новый сайт (((
Раньше я работал в одной известной юридической компании, и у меня выпала задача переписать сайт с нуля, полный редизайн, текста,SEO, и конверсии. Так как компания на рынке была уже второй десяток лет, страниц на сайте и продуктов было также пару тройку десятков. Знаете сколько я занимался этим ? 3 месяца, не покладая рук, прорабатывая каждую страницу и согласовывая её, помимо этого прорабатывалось то что не видно гл…
❤36🔥20😍4custom 54426479011236758362
Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @maya_pro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Serge_AI 1.0 @serge_ai · 56,422 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 August 2026
Руслан Гамзатов | AI маркетинг @AIGamzatov · 33,948 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026
Нейро Ликбезик | Кирилл Безиков @kirillbezikov · 19,920 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 September 2026
AI Университет @neural_university_webinar · 37,034 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 31 August 2026
Промт дня (Приручаем ChatGPT, Midjourney и другие нейросети) @ai2smm · 59,246 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
ChatGPT, помоги! @GPThelp_ru · 514,092 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
Владимир Туров | Бизнес и рост @turov · 49,124 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
SYNTX FAMILY @syntxfamily · 323,853 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 August 2026
Lama AI @lama_channel_gpt · 24,017 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 September 2026
Анжела Петкова | ИИ на практике @anjela_p · 78,844 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 August 2026
НейроProfit | Соня Pro Ai @NeuralProfit · 23,630 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 September 2026
Нейросетевые покои: нейросети, ChatGPT, Midjourney @neural_houses · 44,072 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
НейроНатали | Обучение Нейросетям @Neyronatali · 20,504 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 September 2026
Нейроконцентрат | нейросети, технологии @AIConcentrate · 30,576 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 6 September 2026
Беляк про нейросети @belyakAi · 31,315 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 7 September 2026
💎 Зерокодер | Нейросети и искусственный интеллект @oqode · 39,420 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 30 August 2026
Ринат Шакиров | Промпты для Midjourney | ChatGPT | @dailyprompts · 42,497 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 29 August 2026
Канал Игоря Зуевича @zuevichigor · 39,780 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 August 2026
Сергей Нагорный | Маркетинг и Нейросети @gora_academy · 20,116 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 3 October 2026
🟡NeuroGraph @neyr0graph · 34,280 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 20 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🥇Ковчег / ВАЙБВОРКИНГ GrokBot и Cursor AI” (@maya_pro), 12,847 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maya_pro.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.