Video message, posted without a caption
😁23🔥18❤16❤🔥4🏆3💯1

Channel
@kurchanov_prod
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
29,225subscribers
-580 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001834389479 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kurchanov_prod |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kurchanov_prod |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 09:58 | 29,225 | -39 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 03:17 | 29,264 | -10 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:56 | 29,274 | -35 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 08:37 | 29,309 | -11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:25 | 29,320 | -12 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:53 | 29,332 | -19 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:09 | 29,351 | -11 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:35 | 29,362 | -11 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:45 | 29,373 | -19 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:57 | 29,392 | -14 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:39 | 29,406 | -47 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:26 | 29,453 | -33 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 01:57 | 29,486 | -29 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 06:19 | 29,515 | -26 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:05 | 29,541 | -42 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 22:52 | 29,583 | -26 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 29,609 | -16 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:35 | 29,625 | -12 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 29,637 | -9 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 29,646 | first reading |
26 posts held, back to 25 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 26 (25 May 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 41,670 |
| Reactions total | 1,062 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Sept 2026, 01:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4,494 reactions across 26 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,398 | 31.1% | |
| 🔥 | 1,176 | 26.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 467 | 10.4% | |
| 💯 | 197 | 4.38% | |
| ⚡ | 180 | 4.01% | |
| 🥰 | 169 | 3.76% | |
| 🏆 | 114 | 2.54% | |
| 🙏 | 112 | 2.49% | |
| 🎉 | 109 | 2.43% | |
| 😍 | 96 | 2.14% | |
| 🤯 | 93 | 2.07% | |
| 😁 | 76 | 1.69% | |
| 🤩 | 75 | 1.67% | |
| custom 5373230475022179039 | 46 | 1.02% | |
| custom 5471954395719539651 | 44 | 0.979% | |
| 🤣 | 42 | 0.935% | |
| 🫡 | 31 | 0.69% | |
| 👏 | 19 | 0.423% | |
| 😭 | 19 | 0.423% | |
| 🤝 | 18 | 0.401% | |
| 1 further kind | 13 | 0.289% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,494 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 25 May 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video message, posted without a caption
😁23🔥18❤16❤🔥4🏆3💯1
170.000+ подписчиков с 1 рилс Автор ролика девушка Регина, у которой до этого было только 2000 подписчиков, призналась, что перед съемкой этого рилса она находилась в экзистенциальном кризисе, без какого-то энтузиазма что-либо делать. Но она приняла решение проводить съемки стабильно каждый день, вне зависимости от настроения. Первые три ролика ничего не набрали, а вот четвёртый сильно изменил её жизнь) Сейчас её…
🔥38❤24⚡9custom 54719543957195396513
Такой отклик большой от вас на мой пост! Спасибо дорогие, выделю время и изучу все ваши рекомендации. Потом поделюсь, что помогло 😌
🏆37❤🔥27❤18💯1
Как же я ЗАДОЛБАЛСЯ постоянно парится по всякой фигне… Я могу полчаса оформлять 1 сторис, лишь бы кто не подумал, что я их не умею оформлять Переживать пол дня не грубо ли я ответил в какой-нибудь переписке Думать «а вдруг 10% чаевых официанту это мало и он на меня обиделся?» И прочий бред, который выжигает у меня кучу энергии Так хочется легкости… Если вы знаете классного психотерапевта, (только без духоманств…
❤97❤🔥50🔥36💯16😭3
Моргенштерн* выложил рилс с текстом на черном фоне, который за 14 часов набрал 6 миллионов просмотров И казалось бы, он нарушает все правила экспертов по контенту: - ссылка на сайт 😱 - длинный текст 🥴 - никакой динамики 🥱 Но именно поэтому это и сработало. Его пост выглядит не как «контент», а как личное сообщение к его аудитории. Плюс у Моргена сумасшедший капитал внимания, который он создавал годами. Естественн…
❤70❤🔥28🔥21💯9
Не завидуем ✋🙂↔️
🔥57😁27😍20❤3🤣2🙏1
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥88❤33😍18❤🔥5💯2
Рум тур моего офиса-студии 🔥
🔥24👏12
Я откопал 6 ЦЕННЕЙШИХ постов в этом канале, которые вы могли пропустить 👇🏻 Разборы для новичков рилс с продюсером Антонова 30 принципов успешных блогеров Подкаст-мотивация, почему отговорка «не знаю что снимать» - бред Лайфхак, который завалит вас клиентами Монтаж, который работает на вас - мои фишки Мои 5 принципов в создании контента Что посмотрели?
🔥15❤🔥11⚡10🤝5❤4
Колобок по охвату внимания самый УСПЕШНЫЙ фильм года И с этим не поспорить: Перенос человека паука, выходки режиссёров и актеров, уголовные дела - благодаря такому комбо об этом фильме говорит вся страна 🤷🏻♂️ Но вот только внимание не = деньги. Хайп на ненависти дает охват, но не дает лояльность. Сходить разок то, может, люди и сходят, но пересматривать, ходить на другие фильмы режиссера, покупать мерч никто не з…
💯91🔥43❤🔥23❤14👏2
Я хакнул тредс и рилс и вот как вам сделать также ВАЖНО: После этого поста многие начнут использовать эту схему, поэтому применяйте первыми, пока она не перестала работать И прожмите реакций вашему любимому рилс продюсеру за такие эксклюзивы)) Короче, какое-то время назад я заметил, что в Рилс многие начали комментировать ветки из тредс и собирать миллионы просмотров. Но комментировать экспертные ветки пока особо…
❤124🔥50🫡29❤🔥5🤝1
Все начинают с 0 подписчиков. Начинайте постить.
🔥146💯76❤49⚡13
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @kurchanov_prod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@kurchanov_prod edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Жители РФ как у вас сейчас работают запрещенные соцсети и мессенджеры? Лично у меня последнее время все летает, сбои редко. Интересно, как у вас.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 25 May 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Продюсер Курчанов” (@kurchanov_prod), 29,225 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kurchanov_prod.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.