Тогда может имеет смысл сразу генерить фото товара в грязном зеркале примерочной? 🤔

Channel
AI ✕ Business
@ai_x_business
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,203subscribers
-18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001680748177 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ai_x_business |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ai_x_business |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 17:17 | 2,203 | -8 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 21:37 | 2,211 | -6 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 15:17 | 2,217 | -10 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 03:20 | 2,227 | +3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:07 | 2,224 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 2,225 | +5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:27 | 2,220 | -8 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 2,228 | -4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 2,232 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:57 | 2,234 | +13 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:31 | 2,221 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:22 | 2,221 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 7 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 36s
- Average length
- 32s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
141 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 54 | 38.3% | |
| 🔥 | 27 | 19.1% | |
| 😁 | 27 | 19.1% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 7.09% | |
| 🤣 | 9 | 6.38% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 4.96% | |
| 🏆 | 3 | 2.13% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 1.42% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.709% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.709% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 141 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 7 September 2024 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 2
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 2
- of 16 we hold a reading for · 13%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ai_x_business. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 September 2024 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Нужно ли публиковать на канале готовые промпты? 🤔 Вроде бы логично. Люди любят конкретные инструменты: скопировал, вставил — получил результат. Но есть одна проблема. Промпт — это не решение задачи. Это лишь способ объяснить задачу нейросети. Если человек сам не понимает: — какую проблему он решает; — каким способом хочет к ней подойти; — как должен выглядеть хороший результат, то никакой «секретный промпт» не …
👍2
Кто картавит?
- Grok50%
- Kling10%
- Gemini30%
- Pixverse0%
- Meta AI10%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
У нас намедни возник максимально странный, но важный вопрос: умеют ли ИИ-голоса картавить? 😄 Ну правда. Если они уже научились генерировать людей, эмоции и живой голос с запинками, повторениями и изощренными ругательствами, почему они все еще разговаривают слишком идеально? В итоге устроили небольшой эксперимент: дали парочку скороговорок 5 популярным генераторам видео. У каждого в ролике свой номер. Попробуйте уг…
😁2
Не переживайте из-за мелочей, для этого есть ИИ 😁
😁5
«Китайцы снова всех обошли!» 😱 Если вы смотрите Reels или Shorts, вам наверняка знаком этот сюжет: «Новая модель круче Клода!» «Новая нейросеть за минуту бесплатно найдёт клиентов!» «Сделает для них сайт и сама всё продаст!» После нескольких таких роликов легко словить фрустрацию. Кажется, что где-то люди уже строят бизнес одной кнопкой, а вы почему-то по старинке продолжаете тратить на работу часы. Спокойно. Не …
👍2
Вдогонку, так сказать 😄 Хороших выходных, нейроэнтузиасты бизнеса!🖖
🤣7
Так с каким ИИ работать в 2026 году? 📚 Claude действительно отлично держит большой контекст, хорошо работает с текстами и меньше льёт воду. 🔎 DeepSeek прекрасно справляется с ролью ИИ-поисковика и умеет глубоко копать информацию в сети. 🛠 ChatGPT — универсальный комбайн: тексты, аналитика, файлы, код, исследования, изображения — почти всё в одном месте. 🎬 Grok после скоропостижной кончины Sora стал одним из самых…
👍4💯4
В продолжение озвученных выводов напрашивается вопрос: в чём ценность эксперта в эпоху четвертой технической революции? Знания стремительно дешевеют. Digital работа будь то текст, дизайн, анализ, код и десятки других задач становятся быстрее. Но доступ к инструментам ещё не создаёт конкурентного преимущества. Один человек получает с их помощью результат. Другой — быстро произведенный нейрослоп. Разница между ними …
🔥4👍1
На нейрофронте все стабильно 😁
😁6💯2👍1
С момента выхода ChatGPT-3.5 прошло уже больше трёх лет Хайп постепенно утих, а практика показала, что реальные проблемы и ограничения нейросетей НЕ обсуждают или ограничиваются громкими обещаниями в рилсах и шортсах. Мы все это время реализовывали проекты и у нас накопилось достаточно опыта, чтобы сделать один простой вывод: Нейросеть — усилитель как интеллекта, так и глупости. Она усиливает мышление, но не замен…
👍5❤3💯1🔥1
Пост для комментов 👇🏻
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @ai_x_business. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Кто картавит?
- Grok50%
- Kling10%
- Gemini30%
- Pixverse0%
- Meta AI10%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 7 September 2024 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@AIGamzatov · 29,875
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026
@aironzak · 121,041
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 September 2026
@belyakAi · 30,746
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 7 September 2026
@mirneyrosetey · 34,468
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 3 September 2026
@neural_houses · 44,640
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
@AIConcentrate · 30,933
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 6 September 2026
@oqode · 39,526
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 30 August 2026
@neuroskep · 29,484
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 September 2026
@serge_ai · 57,484
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 August 2026
@anjela_p · 77,619
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 August 2026
@iidlyabi · 22,600
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 September 2026
@prompt_design · 85,657
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026
@ai2smm · 58,897
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
@neural_university_webinar · 37,547
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 31 August 2026
@zuevichigor · 39,591
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 August 2026
@damirkhalilov · 23,321
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 September 2026
@moremarketingisaid · 23,300
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 September 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AI ✕ Business” (@ai_x_business), 2,203 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ai_x_business.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.