Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Анти FOMO трейдинг

Channel

Анти FOMO трейдинг

@anti_fomo_trading

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

894subscribers

-19 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002095556021
TypeChannel
Username@anti_fomo_trading
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/anti_fomo_trading

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

894913903.57 August 2026 — 913 subscribers7 August 2026 — 912 subscribers8 August 2026 — 912 subscribers16 August 2026 — 910 subscribers23 August 2026 — 906 subscribers30 August 2026 — 903 subscribers8 September 2026 — 901 subscribers16 September 2026 — 894 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 40 days, net -19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 891–916 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 19:21894-7
8 Sept 2026, 16:41901-2
30 Aug 2026, 19:27903-3
23 Aug 2026, 13:36906-4
16 Aug 2026, 08:54910-2
8 Aug 2026, 01:02912no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:07912-1
7 Aug 2026, 13:16913first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 18 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

243 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥17371.2%
custom 52242577820137694713614.8%
🐳3112.8%
custom 535508214654751517520.823%
10.412%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 243 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 12 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @anti_fomo_trading. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 June 2026 to 24 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 08:09 UTC215 views31 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Идея четко отработала! Свипом тейк захватили и улетели в противоположном направлении. Именно поэтому, в «дожиме» соотношение 1/2, так как 1/3 не всегда дают. Очень нравится этот сетап, особенно для торговли на минутке. Некоторые ученики все равно посписывали)) но радует, что идет разделение торговых пар по разным депозитам. Так что риск-менеджмент соблюден) Хочу в канале чаще показывать сетап и внутрянку нашей торг

❤‍🔥24custom 52242577820137694714🐳3

23 Jul 2026, 17:05 UTC224 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Третью неделю с учениками отрабатываем обновленную стратегию после эксперимента Anti Snap PRO. Уже в полноценном режиме - торговле на реальных счетах или челленджах. В эту стратегию входит 2 рабочих сетапа: «дожим» и «разгон». У каждого из них свои правила и четкие аргументы для входа. Сейчас на ETH/USDT «зреет» потенциальный сетап «дожим» - момент, когда идет четкое направление + манипуляция + фильтр по моему авт

❤‍🔥13custom 52242577820137694713🐳2

9 Jul 2026, 07:50 UTC360 views18 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

📈 На этой неделе участники закрытой группы Anti Snap PRO начали торговлю на основных счетах по обновленной стратегии. Эксперимент дал мне основание изменить сетап так, чтобы он стал максимально четким, с минимальной интерпретацией. Так родились два сетапа: Разгон и Дожим. Сейчас торгуем именно их - ученики на своих счетах по 1000$, я на отдельном своем. Все торгуем пару BTC/USD, на минутном таймфрейме с риском 0,5%

❤‍🔥14🐳2custom 52242577820137694712

7 Jul 2026, 13:40 UTC277 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вчера я написала, что стратегия - это всего лишь инструкция, а исполняет ее нервная система конкретного человека. Судя по реакциям, тема отозвалась. Поэтому сегодня расскажу как получить свой профиль реагирования. Когда я поняла, что «нет дисциплины» - это ярлык, а не объяснение, мне понадобился способ увидеть, что именно происходит с конкретным трейдером в сделке. Не догадки и не самокопание, а цифры. Я взяла про

❤‍🔥12🐳5custom 522425778201376947141

6 Jul 2026, 12:18 UTC243 views42 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

❓📈Почему два трейдера с одной стратегией получают совершенно разный результат? На прошлой неделе я запустила опрос - и этот вопрос победил с заметным отрывом. Значит тема актуальна для многих, и мне хочется раскрыть ее подробнее. Скорее всего, каждый из вас имеет такой опыт: другой трейдер торгует по той же логике, по тем же уровням, а в конце месяца у вас минус, а у него плюс. И «он просто лучше знает анализ» ниче

❤‍🔥29🐳6custom 52242577820137694715custom 53550821465475151752

2 Jul 2026, 09:38 UTC272 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥11custom 52242577820137694713🐳1

2 Jul 2026, 09:37 UTC264 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥12🐳1custom 52242577820137694711

1 Jul 2026, 07:21 UTC358 views23 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Новый месяц - новые возможности! Что же принесет нам ИЮЛЬ? 🔼🔽 Привет, трейдеры! Я готовлю для вас много полезного материала для прибыльной торговли, а пока давайте посмотрим на рынок и настроение биткоина на ближайшее время Мои ожидания по снижению, о котором писала здесь и снимала в обзоре здесь - в процессе реализации (первый скрин) Но! Продолжит ли биткоин снижаться с текущих до первой основной цели? - вот хоро

❤‍🔥17custom 52242577820137694714🐳2

29 Jun 2026, 13:13 UTC278 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🤟Сегодня у Upscale проходит очень выгодная акция! Все, кто покупают счета до завтрашнего дня 11:00 по мск - получают возврат стоимости челленджа при первой выплате. То есть, если вы покупаете счет на 10.000$ за 119$, то после прохождения челленджа, получаете эти 119$ обратно вместе с первой выплатой (даже если она будет на 1$) Нельзя не воспользоваться таким предложением, потому что возврат стоимости челленджа обы

❤‍🔥8custom 52242577820137694713🐳2

23 Jun 2026, 08:20 UTC357 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📈Пролив не закончен! Цели снижения и зоны отмены сценария ▶️Смотрите в обзоре: ➡️ на YouTube ❗️Не финансовая рекомендация! Принимайте решения, основанные на своей торговой стратегии и грамотно управляйте рисками ➖➖➖ 👍 Спасибо, Даша

❤‍🔥12🐳3custom 52242577820137694713

18 Jun 2026, 10:23 UTC481 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🪙 #BTC 1 день (первый срин) Все 3 цели, которые копили на протяжении 4 месяцев находясь в боковике - снесли жестко и беспощадно. Об этом давно предупреждала, в том числе в последнем обзоре рынка. После снятия этой ликвидности, цена отскочила, но предпосылок для глобального разворота я пока не вижу. Следующий уровень поддержки ⏺56.600 - нужно смотреть как цена будет на него реагировать. Но есть вероятность, что и ег

❤‍🔥21🐳4custom 52242577820137694714

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @anti_fomo_trading. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Беляк про нейросети
@belyakAi · 30,746
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 7 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Анти FOMO трейдинг” (@anti_fomo_trading), 894 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anti_fomo_trading.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.