Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Егор Кузьмин XR

Channel

Егор Кузьмин XR

@EgorKuzminxr1

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

21,531subscribers

+260 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002100560327
TypeChannel
Username@EgorKuzminxr1
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/EgorKuzminxr1

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

21,27121,95621,613.56 August 2026 — 21,271 subscribers6 August 2026 — 21,271 subscribers7 August 2026 — 21,348 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,481 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,649 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,758 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,803 subscribers13 August 2026 — 21,856 subscribers14 August 2026 — 21,861 subscribers15 August 2026 — 21,918 subscribers17 August 2026 — 21,956 subscribers18 August 2026 — 21,946 subscribers19 August 2026 — 21,916 subscribers20 August 2026 — 21,905 subscribers21 August 2026 — 21,915 subscribers23 August 2026 — 21,908 subscribers25 August 2026 — 21,902 subscribers26 August 2026 — 21,881 subscribers27 August 2026 — 21,848 subscribers29 August 2026 — 21,851 subscribers29 August 2026 — 21,829 subscribers30 August 2026 — 21,811 subscribers31 August 2026 — 21,799 subscribers1 September 2026 — 21,798 subscribers3 September 2026 — 21,792 subscribers4 September 2026 — 21,747 subscribers8 September 2026 — 21,690 subscribers11 September 2026 — 21,668 subscribers13 September 2026 — 21,643 subscribers14 September 2026 — 21,597 subscribers16 September 2026 — 21,580 subscribers18 September 2026 — 21,531 subscribers21,5316 August 202618 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 43 days, net +260. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,168–22,059 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 17:5721,531-49
16 Sept 2026, 06:5621,580-17
14 Sept 2026, 16:1621,597-46
13 Sept 2026, 03:3621,643-25
11 Sept 2026, 03:0221,668-22
8 Sept 2026, 07:3721,690-57
4 Sept 2026, 23:3721,747-45
3 Sept 2026, 08:1521,792-6
1 Sept 2026, 22:2421,798-1
31 Aug 2026, 20:2421,799-12
30 Aug 2026, 20:2421,811-18
29 Aug 2026, 22:3521,829-22
29 Aug 2026, 00:2421,851+3
27 Aug 2026, 00:2821,848-33
26 Aug 2026, 00:4421,881-21
25 Aug 2026, 00:1321,902-6
23 Aug 2026, 11:1421,908-7
21 Aug 2026, 21:5521,915+10
20 Aug 2026, 14:0421,905-11
19 Aug 2026, 13:4321,916first reading

Engagement

52 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.3%
avg views ÷ 21,531 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,640
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 52 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held52 (10 July 20263 September 2026)
Views total29,084
Reactions total816
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 13:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14m 24s
Average length
48s

Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,062 reactions across 48 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1,68241.4%
1,62940.1%
👍1984.87%
custom 52358072067707504071032.54%
🥰932.29%
❤‍🔥771.90%
💯531.30%
481.18%
😍360.886%
🏆270.665%
🙏270.665%
👏210.517%
🤩140.345%
🤪140.345%
😁80.197%
👾70.172%
🙈60.148%
🎉40.098%
🤣40.098%
💔30.074%
5 further kinds80.197%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,062 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
24
across the posts below
Posts paid on
18
of 50 we hold a reading for · 36%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @EgorKuzminxr1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 52 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 12:26 UTC744 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Что бы я делал, если бы сегодня начинал с 0 в нейросетях Многим кажется, что сейчас стартовать гораздо сложнее, чем четыре года назад, когда начинал я. Но на самом деле окупить первые вложения сегодня проще простого. Уже через несколько часов, в 19:00 мск, проведу вебинар, где расскажу, как перестать генерить в стол, научиться себя продавать и выйти на стабильный ежемесячный доход на нейросетях: 🔴Как набрать подпи

2

2 Sept 2026, 15:33 UTC≈1,860 views54 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026

Больше 6000 человек идут на вебинар 🤯 Ашалеть! Такого ажиотажа у нас ещё не было. Мне так приятно и одновременно волнительно 🥹 Я уже закончил готовить презентацию, получилось просто офигенно. Уверен, что каждому из вас зайдет материал. Ниже расскажу, почему всем нужно быть завтра 100% aka наша программа на вебинар ⬇️ 🔴Как набрать подписчиков в соцсетях AI-креатору AI — это единственная ниша сейчас, где можно раска

33🔥15custom 52358072067707504075👾1

2 Sept 2026, 15:33 UTC≈1,730 views18 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

13🥰3🙏2

31 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC≈2,410 views48 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026
Photo

Как перестать генерить в стол и выйти на 200 000 ₽ в месяц в AI в 2026 году Недавно исполнилось 4 года, как я занимаюсь нейросетями. За это время моя жизнь изменилась на 180 градусов. — Я поработал с Егором Кридом, ARTIK & ASTI, Элджеем, Дорой, Мотом, Яном Топлесом, Cream Soda, PIMS, Twinby, Мишей Литвиным, The Limba, Давой, Artem Shilovets, Nkeii, AMCHI, Эрикой Люндмоен, Т-Банком, Авто.ру, Mobile Legends. И это то

22🔥16👍73

30 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC≈2,790 views156 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥81😍3628❤‍🔥11

29 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTC≈3,200 views83 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Voice message

Стабильных и больших заработков в нейросетях нет Я вижу, что у большинства сформировано мнение, будто зарабатывать на нейросетях 100-200 тысяч в месяц нереально. Отчасти могу с этим согласиться. Почему — подробно рассказал в подкасте. — Почему у талантливых людей нет денег, а у средненьких работы продаются от 100к за 15 секунд — Где точно НЕ надо искать клиентов — За что на самом деле платит клиент (или почему ва

579custom 52358072067707504078👍6🔥3

28 Aug 2026, 15:51 UTC≈3,480 views50 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Актёр из ТЮЗа заработал 200 тысяч на нейросетях На обучение приходят люди совершенно из разных сфер: менеджер, военный, директор предприятия, но актёров еще не было. Андрей работает в екатеринбургском театре юного зрителя. Обычная творческая профессия, только совсем из другой области, не связанная с ИИ. Долго думал, чем бы заняться дополнительно, и начал присматриваться к нейросетям. Сомневался: стоит ли вообще туд

🔥23195😁3

27 Aug 2026, 08:44 UTC≈3,700 views133 reactions2 Starsread 3 September 2026
Video

Запись эфира по AI-спецэффектам и работе с реальной съёмкой (VFX) Если вам интересно развиваться в нейросетях, вы обязательно должны знать, как работать с реальной съёмкой. Кому-то может показаться, что всё проще простого, но в этом деле есть свои нюансы. Нужно уметь анализировать исходный материал, разбирать футаж, представлять пространство уже отснятой сцены, понимать её физику и логику объектов. На эфире разобр

🔥9032🥰9😁2

25 Aug 2026, 15:57 UTC≈1,430 views102 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Video

Эфир по AI-спецэффектам и работе с реальной съёмкой (VFX) Вчера вышел новый клип Zivert — GAZ, в котором приняли участие мои ученики с последнего потока Роман и Алмаз. Посмотрите клип, и вы увидите, как много AI внедряют сейчас. Во многих сценах вообще не догадаться, что это нейронка, настолько органично всё вписано в реальную съёмку. Давайте посмотрим правде в глаза, нейронки захватывают мир 3D-шников. 90% заказо

45🔥33❤‍🔥19🙏3👍2

25 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC≈4,160 views104 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Мне стыдно вести соцсети Судя по настроению в моём директе, всех интересуют одни и те же вопросы. Как оформить портфолио? Куда его выложить — на Tilda или Behance, может, сделать сайт? Какие работы там вообще должны быть? Складывается впечатление, что все посмотрели один и тот же рилс, где говорится про волшебное портфолио, если оформишь всё как надо, то клиенты посыпятся сами 😅 Можете закидать меня камнями, но за

65💯24🔥9👾4🙏2

24 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC≈3,580 views66 reactions1 Starread 30 August 2026
Photo

Про эту нейросеть все забыли Эта нейронка последнее время вообще не мелькает в соцсетях. Всё, что вы видите — это реклама агрегаторов. Но её нет в Higgsfield, а в Syntx функционал неполный. В итоге про неё просто забыли, и никто ей сейчас не пользуется. Из-за этого большинство AI-работ, которые вы видите в ленте, похожи одна на другую. А ведь Midjourney — та самая нейросеть, которая делает красивый и уникальный виз

34🔥246👀2

23 Aug 2026, 15:18 UTC≈3,810 views80 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Какие клиенты платят большие чеки за AI-видео Рынок нейросетей сейчас дико поменялся. AI-креаторы заменяют и видеографов, и 3D-шников, и CGI-студии. То, что раньше делали месяцами, сегодня собирается в нейросетях за часы или даже дни, но разницу вы уже не увидите. Для вас это хорошие новости, потому что заказов стало в разы больше. Сейчас нет ниши, куда бы это нельзя было применить: бренды, артисты, крупные компани

🔥3731🙏6🤣4🤔2

Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @EgorKuzminxr1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@EgorKuzminxr1 edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Aug 2026, 14:37 UTCAnonymous Poll218 voters

Кто снова пропускает мощный эфир?

  1. Я идуууу 🤩41%
  2. Снова пропускаю 😟11%
  3. А будет запись? 🥹54%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

SYNTX FAMILY
@syntxfamily · 323,728
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 August 2026
Илья Палий
@mirneyrosetey · 34,468
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 3 September 2026
Беляк про нейросети
@belyakAi · 30,746
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 7 September 2026
Нейроконцентрат | нейросети, технологии
@AIConcentrate · 30,933
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 6 September 2026
Арон Закрия
@aironzak · 121,041
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 September 2026
Руслан Гамзатов | AI маркетинг
@AIGamzatov · 29,875
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026
Смотри, Морозов и ИИ
@mmmorozov · 61,416
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026
Serge_AI 1.0
@serge_ai · 57,484
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 August 2026
Киселёва тут | AI • режиссура • портфолио
@kiselevatut · 23,096
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 September 2026
Анжела Петкова | ИИ на практике
@anjela_p · 77,619
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Егор Кузьмин XR” (@EgorKuzminxr1), 21,531 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EgorKuzminxr1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.