5 measurements spanning 5 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 63,574–63,602 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 03:02
63,591
+14
11 Aug 2026, 04:05
63,577
-1
10 Aug 2026, 03:51
63,578
-10
8 Aug 2026, 05:31
63,588
-11
7 Aug 2026, 11:00
63,599
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
17.7%
avg views ÷ 63,591 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,300
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 10 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held
10 (17 June 2026 – 30 July 2026)
Views total
33,750
Reactions total
1,350
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
865
Videos
75
Links
105
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
5,264 reactions across 10 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,867
35.5%
🤣
1,091
20.7%
🔥
801
15.2%
🎉
421
8.00%
😁
377
7.16%
😢
167
3.17%
👍
140
2.66%
🙏
64
1.22%
😍
55
1.04%
❤🔥
48
0.912%
🍾
46
0.874%
⚡
26
0.494%
🤬
23
0.437%
🍌
19
0.361%
🥴
18
0.342%
💔
13
0.247%
🤔
12
0.228%
🏆
11
0.209%
🙈
11
0.209%
🙉
11
0.209%
9 further kinds
43
0.817%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,264reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В чем сила, брат? В людях!
Люди сделали наш Кэмп крутым даже под этим чертовым дождем.
И в этом вся суть.
Я провожу такие встречи в клубе, потому что по себе знаю, как это важно. Когда я только приехал в Москву, мне больше всего не хватало именно людей.
Я ходил на разные нетворкинги, бизнес-завтраки, тренинги — находил там людей, у которых жил (да, было!), клиентов, друзей, блогеров, партнеров. И благодаря этому …
Кажется, меня проклял бог Дождя
И я въебал уже 9 млн рублей на попытки сделать крутое мероприятие под открытым небом.
1. Мой прошлый день рождения, 25 лет
— потратил 1,5 млн₽ за целую площадку на природе, но начался жесткий ливень. И весь вечер мы протусили в какой-то палатке 2на2 метров
2. Выпускной Формулы Запуска
— трачу на него 4млн₽. И именно в этот день пошел ГРАД! Летом. Все смывает нахуй, все промокли, зам…
Зайти в Кэш’ю: ❌🙅♂️
Отдать деньги «Мише Тимочко» который какого-то хуя написал в личку и попросил 10 000₽, чтобы преумножить их в 10 раз на инвестициях: ✅🤩👍🏻
Если что, это все мошенники, я никогда не занимался никакими инвестициями!
Воздухан, темщик, диванный Сократ, жопник, бабка, художник, спринтер
— это названия разных денежных сценариев.
Послушайте на х1,5. В конце голосового рассказал кто я.
Пошел 7 месяц, полет нормальный!
У Амалии наконец-то прошел токсикоз. Теперь она чувствует себя прекрасно и наоборот стала гипер-активной перед родами😅
А у сына разблокирован навык:
- кувыркаться
Сегодня я получил паспорт!🥳
Я шел к этому 9 лет.
И вот сижу сейчас, смотрю на него, а он настоящий, с моей фоткой и данными. Вроде просто бумажка, но сколько значения она для меня имеет.
Знали бы вы через сколько очередей и проблем с документами мне пришлось пройти. И еще многое предстоит, но уже как гражданину, а не мигранту.
Теперь я наконец-то могу свободно вылететь из страны куда-то в отпуск со всей семьей, п…
❤840🎉421🔥257🍾46🤬20🍌19👍18🤣17
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @mtimochko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 204,860 of 1,084,084entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Маргулан Сейсембай @MargulanSeissembai · 211,730 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 August 2026
Михаил Гребенюк @grebenukm · 263,201 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
Седа Каспарова @Seda_Kasparova_news · 256,480 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 August 2026
Аяз @AyazShabutdinov · 181,163 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
Ольга Гогаладзе @profinansy · 582,991 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
NADIN NADIN @NADIN_NADINEE · 255,121 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 10 August 2026
Мемперия Катерины Побоженко | Шаблоны и оригиналы | Мемы в REELS @formemas · 185,821 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Миша Тимочко” (@mtimochko), 63,591 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mtimochko.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
