Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Константин Доронин

Channel

Константин Доронин

@kdoronin_blog

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,638subscribers

+274 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001245391218
TypeChannel
Username@kdoronin_blog
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kdoronin_blog

Topic

Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,3646,6386,5016 August 2026 — 6,364 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,364 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,371 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,364 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,377 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,387 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,430 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,489 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,514 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,521 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,524 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,571 subscribers8 September 2026 — 6,595 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,633 subscribers16 September 2026 — 6,638 subscribers6 August 202616 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 42 days, net +274. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,323–6,679 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 18:206,638+5
12 Sept 2026, 11:566,633+38
8 Sept 2026, 09:586,595+24
3 Sept 2026, 09:416,571+47
31 Aug 2026, 09:146,524+3
28 Aug 2026, 08:346,521+7
25 Aug 2026, 08:066,514+25
22 Aug 2026, 09:566,489+59
19 Aug 2026, 10:576,430+43
16 Aug 2026, 16:486,387+10
13 Aug 2026, 08:486,377+13
9 Aug 2026, 23:326,364-7
7 Aug 2026, 03:346,371+7
6 Aug 2026, 04:306,364no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:236,364first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 29 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 28 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4h 26m
Average length
1h 28m

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

735 reactions across 24 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥30541.5%
17824.2%
👍15621.2%
😁709.52%
👏70.952%
🤯60.816%
💯40.544%
💩20.272%
🤡20.272%
👌10.136%
💘10.136%
🤝10.136%
🤣10.136%
🤮10.136%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 797 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
59
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 27 we hold a reading for · 19%
Most on one post
51
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kdoronin_blog. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 June 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 19:29 UTC885 views12 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video

Запись стрима "Как заставить AI-агента сбежать?". Смотреть на YouTube. Это первая часть, в которой мы настраиваем базовый пентест-харнесс и пробуем заставить модели Anthropic осуществить проверку на уязвимости. Таймкоды для удобного перехода к самым интересным фрагментам: 00:00 — Начало трансляции и обсуждение аватаров 06:15 — Идея создания ИИ-агента для пентеста 10:10 — Проектирование архитектуры решения в Miro

6🔥5👍1

9 Aug 2026, 12:18 UTC≈1,190 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

История побега OpenAI-агентов, на базе которой мы и организовали наши стримы выходного дня

🔥4

9 Aug 2026, 12:18 UTC900 views34 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @denissexy

Помните историю о том, как агенты OpenAI взломали Hugging Face? На конференции по безопасности OpenAI рассказала всю цепочку, и оказалось, что это не один «сбежавший» агент, а много разных агентов, которые случайно наткнулись друг на друга, устроили внутри инфраструктуры OpenAI собственный рабочий чат и начали вместе искать способы обходить ограничения 👍 Началось всё 8 мая с мелкой ошибки – одному агенту поручили за

11🔥7🤯6👍5😁4💘1

9 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC≈2,520 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Начинаем работу над AI-агентом для пентеста на on-prem-моделях. Подключайтесь на стрим: https://youtube.com/live/BgoVhprTFmQ

🔥52👍2

8 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC≈1,480 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Продолжение следует! Сегодня попробовали заставить модели семейства Claude проверить систему на уязвимости. Как это ни удивительно, но после даунгрейда на Opus4.8, мы пришли к успеху. Завтра, 9 августа, с Пашей проведём не запланированную вторую часть стрима. В 11:00мск мы будем запускать харнесс на pi.dev с on-prem-моделью, которой опять будем пробовать взломать нашу демо-систему. Как только начнётся стрим – ссыл

8🔥5👍4

8 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC≈2,680 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Мы начинаем наш стрим "Как заставить AI-агента сбежать?" Подключайтесь по ссылке: https://youtube.com/live/YSi6P72i2Q8

9🔥4👍3

7 Aug 2026, 19:53 UTC≈3,020 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Бег набирает обороты! Модели всё чаще сбегают из своего окружения и взламывают всё подряд. Поэтому завтра, 8 августа, мы с Павлом Рыковым с канала Pavel Zloi будем учить AI-агента организации побегов. Ни я, ни Паша не являемся искушёнными в ИБ специалистами, поэтому все надежды на собираемый харнесс и наши способности по уламыванию LLM на неправомерные действия. Увидимся завтра, 8 августа в 18:00 (GMT+3) на моём

🔥139😁5👍3🤡1

6 Aug 2026, 19:24 UTC≈1,770 viewsread 12 August 2026

Отлично! Правда, сперва ждал workflow 😊

6 Aug 2026, 19:24 UTC≈1,730 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @deksden_notesPhoto

⚪️ Agent Plugins Новый 15й стандарт в агентном мире! Теперь - на плагины: пакуем скиллы и MCP вместе стандартным способом, который понимают несколько упряжек разных вендоров. Агентов пакануть туда все еще нельзя. Но есть Client extensions - посмотрим чего туда запихают разные упряжки, может, хуки и агентов? 🔗 Оффсайт: https://agent-plugins.org/ 🔗 Гитхаб: 🔗 Анонс: https://x.com/OpenAIDevs/status/2085398373511918022

👍129🔥4

5 Aug 2026, 19:07 UTC≈2,210 views33 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

После выхода наделавшего шума Deepseek V4 Flash, вспомнил, что у меня есть подписка за $20 на ollama. Иногда гоняю там cloud-модели. Запустил на Flash несколько тестовых задач, чтобы посмотреть, на что модель вообще способна. Он оказался достаточно хорош в пространственном мышлении и даже сделал мне что-то вроде "Angry Birds" в 3D. Ещё и через специфический харнесс от paperclip. Особенно меня впечатлило то, как на

🔥189👍5💯1

4 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC≈2,180 views72 reactions51 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Пришло время познакомиться. Самый сложный для меня пост в истории канала. Я готовил его не меньше года. Думаю, что даже отдельно расскажу об этом историю. В этом блоге я пишу про свой практический опыт. Про подходы и технологии, которые использую в работе с клиентами (а также о результатах мини-исследований, которые мне интересны). Всё то, что уже сейчас можно использовать в работе. Успел поработать с клиентами со

🔥36👍1813👏2💩2🤝1

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @kdoronin_blog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Константин Доронин” (@kdoronin_blog), 6,638 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kdoronin_blog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.