Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
Neural Networks | Нейронные сети
@neural
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,724subscribers
+258 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001083894110 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @neural |
| Description | Все о машинном обучении По всем вопросам - @notxxx1 № 4959169263 |
| Created | 28 November 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 52 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/neural |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 16:59 | 11,724 | -5 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 14:01 | 11,729 | -3 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 15:58 | 11,732 | -2 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 13:19 | 11,734 | -7 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 10:46 | 11,741 | -2 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 09:07 | 11,743 | -1 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 11:00 | 11,744 | +2 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 14:26 | 11,742 | +3 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 13:00 | 11,739 | -5 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 12:50 | 11,744 | +1 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 10:40 | 11,743 | +2 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 09:45 | 11,741 | +3 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 10:58 | 11,738 | +2 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 11:00 | 11,736 | +2 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 14:06 | 11,734 | +1 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 16:46 | 11,733 | +109 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 09:30 | 11,624 | +6 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 07:28 | 11,618 | +4 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 08:07 | 11,614 | +4 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 11:00 | 11,610 | first reading |
Engagement
47 posts held, back to 11 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 8.54%
- avg views ÷ 11,724 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,000
- 16 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 16
- of 47 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 47 (11 June 2026 – 9 November 2026) |
| Views total | 16,019 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 09:07 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈943
- Videos
- ≈207
- Links
- ≈9,560
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 13m 39s
- Average length
- 2m 44s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 16 posts held from the last 30 days (6.25%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
📌 Тест моделей OpenAI и Anthropic на социальную дедукцию Подкастер Дваркеш Патель потратил 20 000 долларов на API, организовав турнир среди 11 моделей по игре Blood on the Clocktower, усложненного аналога Мафии. 🟡Правила игры Весь смысл - в борьбе за информацию. Участвуют несколько игроков и ведущий, который раздаёт тайные роли и сам ни за кого не играет. Меньшинство - злые: демон и двое помощников, они с самого …
Photo, posted without a caption
ИИ-агент удалил базу за 9 секунд. И бэкапы тоже? Агента в Cursor попросили починить ключи доступа, а он одним API-запросом снёс продовый том стартапа PocketOS вместе с бэкапами. Разбираем, почему агенту нельзя давать ключи от прода.**ИИ-агент удалил продовую базу за 9 секунд. И бэкапы тоже** Разработчик стартапа PocketOS попросил агента в Cursor исправить проблему с ключами доступа в тестовом окружении. Но агент на…
ИИ опроверг гипотезу, на которой 27 лет строилась теоретическая информатика OpenAI и Anthropic независимо заявили, что их AI-модели нашли способ опровергнуть Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) - гипотезу 1999 года, на которой основаны тысячи исследований сложности алгоритмов. В чём суть? Есть задача 3-SAT: подобрать значения true и false для переменных так, чтобы логическое выражение стало истинным. ETH предполага…
Qwenputer - редакция AI-модели Qwen3.5, способная симулировать RISC-V CPU для выполнения кода на C и MicroPython В рамках проекта Qwenputer исследователи подготовили расширенный вариант AI-модели Qwen3.5-4B, в котором реализован встроенный симулятор полноценного 32-разрядного CPU на базе архитектуры RISC-V (RV32IM), поддерживающего расширение Zba и оснащённого сопроцессором bignum для арифметических операций с больш…
Отдельный Git worktree защищает ваши изменения от ИИ-агента. Но не изолирует от него компьютер. Агент по-прежнему может выйти за пределы каталога, прочитать другие файлы или обратиться к сети – если клиент не ограничивает это отдельно. JetBrains рассказала, как решает эту задачу в облачных агентах Air: - На каждую задачу создаётся новая виртуальная машина, которая не используется повторно. - Агент работает в Docke…
Opus 5.5 вскрывает любую программу: реверс-инжиниринг с ИИ Как с помощью Claude Opus 5.5, REA и Ghidra разобрать закрытый бинарник, восстановить логику и собрать свою чистую реализацию. https://uproger.com/opus-5-5-reverse-engineering-rea/
OpenAI переманивает крупных клиентов Anthropic скидками до 40%, пишет The Information. По данным издания, Replit получила скидку более 30% по контракту стоимостью свыше $100 млн в год и перевела основную часть расходов на OpenAI. Изменение кода заняло несколько часов. В Rippling доля OpenAI в задачах программирования с мая выросла с 16% до 52%, а Anthropic — упала с 57% до 18%. DataCamp предложили 40% скидки при и…
✔️ OpenAI обязала шлюзы и роутеры моделей проходить проверку С 20 ноября сторонние сервисы, дающие доступ к API, то есть шлюзы, роутеры и реселлеры, смогут работать только после одобрения компании. Базовых правил уже недостаточно, от них требуют фильтры безопасности, согласование блокировок и разбор случаев вредоносного использования API. Вместе с этим введена и система SafetyID, через которую партнёр будет изолир…
Модели решений: Drex 2.0 против Jev Nace AI выпустила Drex 2.0, MoE на 35B параметров для решений внутри ИИ-систем. Сравниваем с Jev, разбираем бенчмарки и сценарии: фильтр кода, экономия на вызовах LLM, договоры. В архитектуре ИИ-систем набирает силу отдельный класс моделей: модели решений. Они не пишут текст и не рассуждают вслух, а получают контекст и выбирают один вариант из заранее заданного набора. Главным ор…
🪰 «Матрица» для мухи: симуляцию мозга подключили к миру, созданному ИИ Odyssey заявила, что подключила программную модель мозга плодовой мушки к Odyssey-3. По словам команды, теперь она самостоятельно перемещается по сгенерированным виртуальным мирам. Odyssey-3 создаёт интерактивную среду, которая меняется в ответ на действия внутри неё. Это позволяет исследовать поведение агента в окружении, которого никогда не су…
Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @neural. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@ai_machinelearning_big_data · 275,6595 postsАнализ данных (Data analysis)
@data_analysis_ml · 51,9232 postsAndroid разработка
@android_its · 4,8611 postBig Data AI
@bigdatai · 18,3291 postC++ Academy
@cpluspluc · 15,4571 postC# (C Sharp) programming
@csharp_ci · 17,9631 postМатематика Дата саентиста
@data_math · 14,4191 postDevOps
@DevOPSitsec · 23,8921 postАнглийский для программистов
@english_forprogrammers · 8,2371 postGolang
@Golang_google · 40,4531 postJavascript
@javascriptv · 16,6641 postJava
@javatg · 16,5631 postLinux Academy
@linuxacademiya · 28,6471 postKali Linux
@linuxkalii · 55,8421 postMachine learning Interview
@machinelearning_interview · 30,5601 postIT мемы | Мемы программиста
@memes_prog · 6,2201 postМобильная разработка
@mobdevelop · 3,8411 postPHP Academy
@phpshka · 9,1311 postPython вопросы с собеседований
@python_job_interview · 24,9061 postPython/ django
@pythonl · 58,2871 postReact JS
@react_tg · 16,0491 postRust
@rust_code · 9,1521 postData Science. SQL hub
@sqlhub · 36,0251 postИскусственный интеллект. Высокие технологии
@vistehno · 70,1391 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@neural named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 4 November 2026 – 4 November 2026
named in 1 post, 4 November 2026 – 4 November 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@vistehno · 70,139
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 20 August 2026
@datascienceiot · 42,496
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 29 August 2026
@python_job_interview · 24,906
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 September 2026
@sqlhub · 36,025
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 September 2026
@data_analysis_ml · 51,923
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 August 2026
@pythonl · 58,287
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 August 2026
@devsp · 19,659
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 September 2026
@neuroskep · 29,744
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 September 2026
@machinelearning_interview · 30,560
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 7 September 2026
@DevOPSitsec · 23,892
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 September 2026
@dataflair · 18,577
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 4 October 2026
@DeepLearning_ai · 56,955
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 August 2026
@datascienceml_jobs · 21,642
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 September 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Neural Networks | Нейронные сети” (@neural), 11,724 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neural.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.