#HYPE 入場翻倍,保守考慮減倉 直接給上成本損保護

Channel
Trader_GING交易獵人
@brank666
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,861subscribers
-2,120 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001708983269 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @brank666 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/brank666 |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Sept 2026, 04:01 | 6,861 | -99 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 15:40 | 6,960 | -133 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:56 | 7,093 | -171 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:56 | 7,264 | -133 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 11:37 | 7,397 | -169 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:25 | 7,566 | -83 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:45 | 7,649 | -170 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:12 | 7,819 | -141 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:57 | 7,960 | -104 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 8,064 | -136 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:28 | 8,200 | -242 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 8,442 | -175 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:53 | 8,617 | -310 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:08 | 8,927 | -54 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 8,981 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:08 | 8,981 | first reading |
Engagement
71 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 71 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 26s
- Average length
- 26s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
21 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 12 | 57.1% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 38.1% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 4.76% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 71 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#HYPE 市價多進去
先預熱一下 # 翻倉活動 首先第二期翻倉挑戰完美結束 500U-1633U用時7天三倍翻倉🙂🙂🙂 所有策略公開透明實時跟進 9.1 第三期翻倉挑戰,實盤倉位500U 我全程盯盤佈局,實時提醒進出倉位。討論組開放答疑思路佈局,短線快進快出,屆時交割記錄同步公開 感兴趣的联系助理:@kefu_YZ 本月加入會員群的均可免費预约名额
#IOTX 入場翻倍
#IOTX 市價多進去
#BTC TP1 1.35%📈 盈亏比 3:1
2.5r 減倉給上成本保護
#BTC 市價空
❤1
#MAGMA tp1 已命中
#MAGMA 市價空
#ONDO 市價空進去
tp 0.2138-0.1955 sl 0.2376
Showing the 12 most recent of 71 posts we hold for @brank666. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Xboshi1 · 20,885
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 September 2026
@oobbb1 · 21,349
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Trader_GING交易獵人” (@brank666), 6,861 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/brank666.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.