Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 宋一雯 & King & 张叶 的策略分享群

Channel

宋一雯 & King & 张叶 的策略分享群

@FFEX3

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

1,431subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001619697993
TypeChannel
Username@FFEX3
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/FFEX3

Growth

1,4311,4381,434.57 August 2026 — 1,438 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,437 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,437 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,434 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,431 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,432 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,431 subscribers7 August 202624 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 17 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,430–1,439 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 06:541,431-1
20 Aug 2026, 20:341,432+1
17 Aug 2026, 21:141,431-3
14 Aug 2026, 13:161,434-3
7 Aug 2026, 22:031,437no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:531,437-1
7 Aug 2026, 13:081,438first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.73%
avg views ÷ 1,431 subscribers
Avg views / post
96.3
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.935%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held18 (25 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,155
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 22:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC65 viewsread 7 August 2026

摩根大通:科技股暴跌不代表AI投资周期结束 8月6日,摩根大通表示,近期亚洲科技股以及半导体板块的大幅回调,并不意味着人工智能投资周期正在结束。该行在周三发布的报告中指出,市场对AI资本支出持续性的担忧已经超过实际情况,目前几乎没有证据显示AI产业基本面正在明显放缓。 摩根大通表示,亚洲科技股以及费城半导体指数近期出现25%至30%的调整,是自2022年底AI驱动上涨周期启动以来的第三次大规模回撤。该行分析师写道:“抛开股价波动不谈,我们未看到任何基本面指标表明未来6至12个月会出现显著疲软。”摩根大通认为,当前AI周期的核心驱动力依然存在。 该行指出,前沿AI模型仍在以数月为周期持续改进,同时,无论是专有模型还是开源模型,对AI推理能力的需求都保持强劲。随着代理式AI(Agentic AI)逐渐发展,AI生态系统的商业化能力也正在提升。市场近期越来越关注大型云计算企业是否还能维持高额AI投资,但摩根大通认为,超大规模云服

Signed AA

6 Aug 2026, 04:23 UTC62 viewsread 7 August 2026

8月6日午间重要动态一览 1.DeepSeek拟上调API服务定价; 2.俄罗斯总统普京已签署加密货币监管框架法案; 3.沃什出任美联储主席后,特朗普与其多次通电话; 4.闪迪CEO:已签署8份NBM长期协议 数据中心需求极度旺盛; 5.美联储戴利:7月会议按兵不动合理,美联储需保持警惕并准备行动; 6.第二批稳定币牌照国庆前后发放?香港金管局:不评论市场传闻 持开放而谨慎态度; 7.Uniswap创始人:目前pools.trade仍处于Beta测试阶段,0.25%的LP交易手续费不会流向团队。

Signed AA

5 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC78 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

8月5日美伊地缘消息显示,特朗普一方面称美伊谈判进展顺利,48小时内将出炉协议结果。 另一方面放出狠话,若伊朗反悔退出谈判便会对其实施重创打击,此前美方甚至筹备过大规模军事行动。 而伊朗官员随即回应,不会在美国武力威胁下达成任何协议,美方施压也造成霍尔木兹海峡相关协议谈判推迟。 双方一边谈判一边相互强硬对峙,短期地缘不确定性大幅上升。

Signed AA

4 Aug 2026, 04:17 UTC71 viewsread 7 August 2026

8月4日午间重要动态一览 1.Telegram已从苹果App Store恢复上线; 2.SK海力士与韩国工会就奖金问题举行谈判; 3.万事达卡已完成对稳定币基础设施公司BVNK的收购; 4.美房地产投资公司Cardone Capital增持350枚比特币; 5.日本经济财政大臣:下半年消费者通胀将加速 随后将放缓; 6.美国财长贝森特罕见公开呼吁美联储扩大一项流动性工具以助力捍卫日元; 7.Coldcard黑客攻击事件造成的总损失规模或已达2,055枚BTC,约价值1.3亿美元。

Signed AA

3 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC83 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

带你梳理本周加密市场关键时间轴。 真正的考验,现在才刚刚开始。 上周美联储利率决议落地,利率维持不变,但市场捕捉到了几个偏鹰信号。短期情绪虽然完成了一轮消化,但这只是前菜。 本周,才是真正决定市场节奏的关键阶段。别急着抄底,先把这几个时间点记住。 8月4日:SpaceX公布2026年第二季度业绩。 很多人会疑惑:一家科技公司的财报,为什么会影响币圈?因为现在的市场,早已经不是单独看某一个资产。科技股、风险资产、加密市场之间的联动越来越强。如果科技赛道情绪继续升温,风险偏好可能得到提振。反之,如果市场预期落空,资金避险情绪可能再次升温。BTC作为高风险资产,很难完全独善其身。 8月6日20:30:美国初请失业金数据。 就业数据,一直是美联储观察经济的重要指标。如果就业出现降温迹象,市场对未来政策转向的预期可能增强。但如果数据依旧强劲,那么高利率维持时间可能继续拉长,风险资产短期仍会承压。 8月7日20:30:美国7

Signed AA

3 Aug 2026, 07:45 UTC88 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

本周重大事件预告: 美国核心就业数据公布,SpaceX带来史上最大解禁,科技股再迎财报潮。

Signed AA

31 Jul 2026, 13:24 UTC107 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

7月31日晚间重要动态一览 1.日本外汇干预规模约8.45万亿日元 2.韩国收紧杠杆ETF首日 成交额暴跌75% 3.据报美国和以色列正讨论可能对伊朗实施陆地封锁 4.Circle获得纽约州金融和法律服务部颁发的信托章程 5.亚马逊盘前大涨12% 云业务营收连续第五个季度增长 6.字节跳动推出Seedance 2.5模型:单次生成时长30秒、突破长叙事能力

1

Signed AA

30 Jul 2026, 14:21 UTC124 viewsread 7 August 2026

美联储9月若维持利率不变,或引发美债收益率大幅飙升 7月30日,分析师爱德华·哈里森(Edward Harrison)撰文指出,尽管当前市场定价显示美联储在9月份加息的概率接近三分之二,但美联储仍有可能再次出人意料地选择按兵不动。若这一情形发生,将进一步推高美国国债收益率曲线,引发市场剧烈动荡。 文章分析称,美联储主席凯文·沃什(Kevin Warsh)在7月议息会议后的新闻发布会上曾暗示,近期金融市场条件的自发收紧,在一定程度上替代了美联储在7月采取行动的需要。基于这一逻辑,市场很可能在9月面临同样的博弈局面。数据显示,尽管6月份核心个人消费支出(PCE)物价指数低于预期,但30年期美国国债实际收益率在周四仍一度飙升至2.98%。 此外,即将公布的经济数据也可能为美联储提供观望的理由。一方面,核心PCE数值低于市场预期;另一方面,美国经济分析局(BEA)正在重新计算物价上涨的统计方式,批评人士认为该方式存在缺陷,其调整结

Signed AA

30 Jul 2026, 06:55 UTC111 viewsread 7 August 2026

世界黄金协会:二季度全球央行及其他官方机构合计净增黄金储备同比增长62% 7月30日,世界黄金协会发布的2026年二季度《全球黄金需求趋势报告》显示,二季度,全球央行及其他官方机构合计净增黄金储备289吨,同比增长62%,多个国家央行的购金活动均有所回升。 但受一季度的疲软拖累,上半年全球央行购金需求略低于近年来的高位水平。世界黄金协会发布的《2026年全球央行黄金储备调研》显示,45%的受访央行预计未来一年内将增加其自身黄金储备,这凸显了黄金在官方储备中长期稳定的重要地位。

Signed AA

29 Jul 2026, 06:22 UTC121 viewsread 7 August 2026

Citadel预计美联储周三加息,而加密分析师预期维持不变 7月29日,据CoinDesk报道,管理670亿美元资产的Citadel预计美联储将在周三意外加息25个基点,而加密和传统市场分析师普遍预期利率将维持不变。 Citadel宏观策略主管Frank Flight表示,加息将“果断结束前瞻指引时代”,迫使市场根据数据而非政策预期定价,并“明确美联储独立性”。CME FedWatch数据显示加息概率为35.8%,高于一周前的25.7%,但市场主流仍押注美联储按兵不动。比特币自上周三从近67,000美元回落至64,000美元以下,市场交投谨慎。 Citadel认为,若等到9月再加息将削弱政策冲击力,鉴于油价上涨和伊朗紧张局势加剧通胀压力,7月加息更为合理。

Signed AA

29 Jul 2026, 02:31 UTC120 viewsread 7 August 2026

交易员权衡美联储加息前景,黄金小幅走低 7月29日,在美联储关键的利率决议前夕,黄金价格小幅走低。现货黄金在早盘交易中交投于4020美元附近,延续了前一交易日的跌势。 利率互换市场显示,美联储加息25个基点的概率约为三分之一,对于临近决策的市场而言,这一不确定性程度在近年标准下显得异常之高。政策制定者可能将在6月低于预期的通胀数据与本月美伊战事重燃所导致的油价上涨之间左右为难。 自五个月前美伊战争爆发以来,黄金价格已下跌近四分之一,因能源价格高企加剧了通胀压力。不过,受逢低买盘支撑,金价自6月底以来一直维持在每盎司4000美元的关键支撑位附近。

Signed AA

28 Jul 2026, 06:56 UTC125 viewsread 7 August 2026

机构:美联储加息压力增大 7月28日,天利投资高级经济学家Anthony Willis在一份报告中表示,由于美国通胀水平仍显著高于目标,同时经济和劳动力市场依然具有韧性,美联储决策者收紧政策的压力有所增加。 Willis表示:“不过,在通胀影响变得更加明确之前,政策制定者可能愿意暂时忽略近期油价飙升带来的影响。”尽管如此,更广泛的走向是显而易见的:在沃什的领导下,美联储正在采取更加鹰派的立场。 市场目前预计美联储周三加息的概率为38%,并且已经完全计价9月加息的可能性。

Signed AA

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @FFEX3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“宋一雯 & King & 张叶 的策略分享群” (@FFEX3), 1,431 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FFEX3.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.