#KAITO 翻倍 兄弟們 注意倉位

Channel
Bob王的加密社區
@BITGETLEVY
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,554subscribers
+35 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001653749525 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BITGETLEVY |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 May 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 20 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BITGETLEVY |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Oct 2026, 19:37 | 4,554 | +7 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 08:21 | 4,547 | -14 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 18:27 | 4,561 | -38 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 18:38 | 4,599 | +1,963 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 16:42 | 2,636 | -109 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 02:57 | 2,745 | -608 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 00:40 | 3,353 | -212 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 15:56 | 3,565 | -231 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 21:36 | 3,796 | -394 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 18:20 | 4,190 | -232 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:14 | 4,422 | -55 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:43 | 4,477 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:27 | 4,480 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 07:34 | 4,485 | -14 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 4,499 | -7 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 4,506 | -13 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 4,519 | +4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:25 | 4,515 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:15 | 4,519 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:05 | 4,519 | first reading |
Engagement
50 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 50 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
9 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 55.6% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 33.3% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 11.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#KAITO 浮盈中
開始發力
Sticker, posted without a caption
止盈:0.6239—0.64 止損:0.5912
#KAITO * 市價多 0.6078
會員群持续盈利中🎉 每天5-8單精准策略 心動不如行動哦❤️ 免費進群聯繫小助理即可 👉點擊免費加入會員群👈
下午好啊 兄弟們
#MMT 獲利中
止盈:0.2082—0.2139 止損:0.1953
❤1
#MMT * 市價多 0.2019
被打損 就漲上去了 有點可惜😡
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @BITGETLEVY. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@sanmage · 30,152
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 6 September 2026
@Xboshi1 · 21,191
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 September 2026
@btc18688 · 28,362
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 September 2026
@oobbb1 · 21,623
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bob王的加密社區” (@BITGETLEVY), 4,554 subscribers as measured 22 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BITGETLEVY.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.