Remember the days of giving teachers gifts at the end of year? Apple on desk society? Now teachers are encircled and fought against in "Modern France".
😨4🤣3

Channel
@TommyRobinsonNews
On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
75,468subscribers
-1,558 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001479163323 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TommyRobinsonNews |
| Description | Support our work here - https://urbanscoop.news/supportus/ Buy my best selling books here - https://www.trsilenced.com/ |
| Created | 27 February 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 37 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TommyRobinsonNews |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 02:59 | 75,468 | -149 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 22:36 | 75,617 | -96 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:37 | 75,713 | -52 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 19:41 | 75,765 | -50 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 07:19 | 75,815 | -69 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 07:56 | 75,884 | -81 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 12:42 | 75,965 | -93 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 07:35 | 76,058 | -82 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:56 | 76,140 | -25 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:24 | 76,165 | -31 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:13 | 76,196 | -53 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 76,249 | -25 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:44 | 76,274 | -30 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 76,304 | -40 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 76,344 | -13 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:25 | 76,357 | -6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:59 | 76,363 | -37 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:32 | 76,400 | -48 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:03 | 76,448 | -72 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:28 | 76,520 | first reading |
728 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 117 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 728 (4 August 2026 – 2 October 2026) |
| Views total | 2,042,877 |
| Reactions total | 124,790 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Oct 2026, 14:08 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 531 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
224,403 reactions across 714 posts, in 65 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤬 | 80,492 | 35.9% | |
| 💯 | 24,003 | 10.7% | |
| 👍 | 21,190 | 9.44% | |
| ❤ | 18,107 | 8.07% | |
| 😈 | 14,091 | 6.28% | |
| 🙏 | 10,106 | 4.50% | |
| 😡 | 10,103 | 4.50% | |
| 👏 | 10,063 | 4.48% | |
| 🤣 | 6,054 | 2.70% | |
| 🤪 | 5,323 | 2.37% | |
| 🌚 | 5,303 | 2.36% | |
| 🔥 | 3,678 | 1.64% | |
| 🫡 | 3,117 | 1.39% | |
| 🤯 | 1,336 | 0.595% | |
| 😢 | 1,333 | 0.594% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1,239 | 0.552% | |
| 😨 | 1,127 | 0.502% | |
| 😱 | 945 | 0.421% | |
| 😁 | 848 | 0.378% | |
| 💔 | 838 | 0.373% | |
| 45 further kinds | 5,107 | 2.28% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 727 of the 728 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 228,423 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 728 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Remember the days of giving teachers gifts at the end of year? Apple on desk society? Now teachers are encircled and fought against in "Modern France".
😨4🤣3
Chickens coming home to roost for the far left as the invaders inevitably turn on this Antifa activist and destroy her property, telling her: "In the name of Allah, shut your mouth, bitch,"
🤪33🌚6🔥4🤣2😭2
"Fires break out". You don't hate legacy media enough.
🤬75😈10🌚4🙈3🎃2
THANKS FOR ALL YOUR SUPPORT I can't say too much about this case at this moment in time due to reporting restrictions. I'm feeling confident, I haven't broke the law, but I am being politically persecuted (again) by the British State and their lackeys in establishment media. Let's see what the 19th brings. A huge thanks to the lads who kept me safe walking to court today, absolute legends. #TRUST #HONOUR #LOYALT…
🙏95👍14🫡11👏5😍3❤2😇2🤣1
I AM AT COURT AGAIN - THE ATTACKS NEVER STOP The Daily Mail want me in prison for 10 years even though they endangered my family and innocent people on holiday in Cyprus. I will be back in court on the 19th, so let's see where this goes.
🙏100❤8👍6😱3🤣1
Roger Verlomme high school in Paris. Educating the French for 140 years. Destroyed in a day by the offspring of invaders. You had enough yet?
🤬108😈16😨8🌚4🍌3❤2💯2😡1
Back in 2020 at the very start of CONvid a degenerate illegal called Omar and his wasteman friends decided to cough in the faces of an elderly couple. The elderly woman was assaulted, got a black eye, and I wasn't having it.
🔥75👏36🫡4🏆1😁1😱1
Spit on me and see what happens. Lying spitting grotesque leftists are mentally ill degenerates. Idiots like this listen to the lies of mainstream media, and some think their actions have no consequence.
🤬95👏41🤣21💯9🫡5
"You may live to see man-made horrors beyond your comprehension". -Nikola Tesla.
😭109😨42🤬26🙏24😱11🍌6🌚4💯2
They got the POS who attacked the statue of Mary in Corsica. Deport!
🔥197👍78👏30🌚16💯11😈10❤8😡6
"Thank you Andy Burnham" and "I'm going to go stealing again" were the replies as Labour empties the prisons because there's "no space left". Yet they've got Danny Tommo on remand for cutting a smugglers boat, and just jailed Del Somerville for 2 years for swearing at police!
🤬225😈38😡13😁9❤3👍3🙏3💔1
François Mauriac secondary school is the latest on a long list destroyed by invader youth. All spurred on by the far left.
🤬211🌚22😡15💯10😈4❤2🍌2🙏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 728 posts we hold for @TommyRobinsonNews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 188 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@TommyRobinsonNews named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 31 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Tommy Robinson |
|---|---|
| Description | British far-right activist and organiser, online influencer and convicted criminal, born 1982 |
| X / Twitter | @trobinsonnewera |
| YouTube | UC6wdP5hTf_phre6Q3kFiV2g |
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tommy Robinson News” (@TommyRobinsonNews), 75,468 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TommyRobinsonNews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.