We pledge our unwavering pursuit of freedom with wisdom and courage!!
When separated, we may only be feathers; When united, we became an eagle soaring high!!
Created
21 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
3 measurements spanning 2 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 129–130 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Aug 2026, 01:31
129
no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:24
129
-1
7 Aug 2026, 04:46
130
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 27 June 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈722
Videos
≈1,060
Links
≈1,840
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 00m
Average length
3m 35s
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
6
66.7%
❤
2
22.2%
🎉
1
11.1%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2022 to 27 July 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
July 24, 2022 By Miles
Miles Guo: Nancy Pelosi's visit to Taiwan will be of great significance if it comes true. Her visit will imply that the U.S. recognizes Taiwan as a sovereign state, and it will set a good example for other U.S. politicians and officials to visit Taiwan in the future. Meanwhile, NATO and Japan will rationalize their joint defense of Taiwan. Given the stakes here, Nancy Pelosi's visit to Taiwa…
July 24, 2022 By Miles
Miles Guo: The CCP built military facilities beneath hospitals, subways, gas and power supply centers of a city. Even Hitler wouldn't have done that! Several years ago when the CCP learned that information of its military projects had been leaked, it had to reconstruct and upgrade many military constructions. Therefore our military intel exposure gave a lethal blow to the CCP! At least a doze…
July 27, 2022 By Miles
Exclusive: 08 Secret Command Communication [2007] No. 118
PLA Air Force Command & PLA Air Force Logistics Department (Request for Approval)
Submitted the Design Task Plan for the Construction of the Air Force's First anti-"Taiwan Independence" Combat Command Dedicated Network Project
Follow more on 👇
@HimalayaEnglishChannel | Source
#CCP #Military #ConfidentialDocumentsEXPOSED
July 27, 2022 By Miles
Exclusive: 07 Secret Command Communication [2007] No. 107
PLA Air Force Command (Request for Approval)
Submitting the Air Force's First Batch of Shortwave Comprehensive Network Connection Construction Project
Follow more on 👇
@HimalayaEnglishChannel | Source
#CCP #Military #ConfidentialDocumentsEXPOSED
July 27, 2022 By Miles
Exclusive: 01 Secret Command Communication [2007] No. 116
PLA Air Force Command & PLA Air Force Logistics Department (Request for Approval)
Submitting the Project Design Task Plan of the Construction of Communication and Command-and-Control System of the Air Force Shanghai Base Underground Command Post
Follow more on 👇
@HimalayaEnglishChannel | Source
#CCP #Military #ConfidentialDocuments…
July 26, 2022 By Miles
Exclusive: 01 Secrete Command Communication [2007] No. 115 PLA Air Force Command &PLA Air Force Logistics Department (Request for Approval)
Submitting the Project Design Task Plan of the Construction of Communication and Command-and-Control System of the Nanjing Military Region Air Force Underground Command Post by the Air Force
Follow more on 👇
@HimalayaEnglishChannel | Source
#CCP #Milit…
July 20, 2022 By Miles
Miles Guo’s GETTR: The U.S. intelligence agency admitted that they not only have obtained the CCP's military intelligence as exposed by our fellow fighter, but also that most of the military personnel on the list are already cooperating with the U.S.; Japan also has a small part of the intelligence and also has the CCP's military personnel working with them. So it seems that CCP's clamor for…
July 20, 2022 By Miles
Miles Guo’s GETTR: We got the U.S. intelligence official’s approval to make the CCP’s top classified military information public, which meanwhile was also conveyed to Taiwanese military officials. Such information would greatly reduce civilian casualties in case a war breaks out between the CCP and Taiwan. The same information was well known by Europe and Israel, but was accused of disinform…
July 20, 2022
Exclusive:Secret Command Communication [2007] No. 86
Submitting the First Batch of Branch Line Optical Cable Construction Project for the PLA Air Force(Request for Approval)
Follow more on 👇
@HimalayaEnglishChannel | Source
#CCP #Military #ConfidentialDocumentsEXPOSED
July 19, 2022
Exclusivo: Informe del documento sobre tareas de diseño para la construcción del sistema de comunicación y comando y control del puesto de comando subterráneo de la zona Sur de la Fuerza Aérea del Partido Comunista de China [2007] No. 115
Follow more on 👇
@HimalayaEnglishChannel | Source
#CCP #Military #ConfidentialDocumentsEXPOSED
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Himalaya_English_Channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Himalaya_English_Channel named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@himalayaenglishchannel named in 17 posts, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Himalaya English Channel” (@Himalaya_English_Channel), 129 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Himalaya_English_Channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.