Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 42 days, net -1,274. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 46,967–48,625 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 00:36
47,158
-62
15 Sept 2026, 17:54
47,220
-49
14 Sept 2026, 00:41
47,269
-35
12 Sept 2026, 04:19
47,304
-80
9 Sept 2026, 21:41
47,384
-101
6 Sept 2026, 11:39
47,485
-98
4 Sept 2026, 01:17
47,583
-43
2 Sept 2026, 12:45
47,626
-25
1 Sept 2026, 13:02
47,651
-32
31 Aug 2026, 10:47
47,683
-29
30 Aug 2026, 13:42
47,712
-7
29 Aug 2026, 16:49
47,719
-50
28 Aug 2026, 13:33
47,769
-41
27 Aug 2026, 10:03
47,810
-6
26 Aug 2026, 13:03
47,816
-22
25 Aug 2026, 13:56
47,838
-14
24 Aug 2026, 16:26
47,852
-54
22 Aug 2026, 23:05
47,906
-45
21 Aug 2026, 11:54
47,951
-34
20 Aug 2026, 13:17
47,985
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 7 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 104 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.9%
avg views ÷ 47,158 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,980
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 September 2026
Posts held
25 (7 June 2026 – 10 September 2026)
Views total
15,960
Reactions total
955
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 05:25 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈394
Videos
≈473
Links
≈6,330
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
19m 15s
Average length
1m 04s
Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,886 reactions across 25 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,668
62.3%
🙏
892
15.2%
👍
711
12.1%
🔥
147
2.50%
💯
133
2.26%
👏
74
1.26%
❤🔥
58
0.985%
💔
46
0.782%
😭
35
0.595%
🤡
23
0.391%
😈
20
0.34%
🥰
20
0.34%
🤔
11
0.187%
🏆
9
0.153%
🖕
9
0.153%
🤣
8
0.136%
💩
6
0.102%
🤮
6
0.102%
🕊
4
0.068%
🍌
3
0.051%
3 further kinds
3
0.051%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,886 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 10 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
September 10, 2025, changed America’s history forever.
One year ago, our founder, our leader, and our friend, Charlie Kirk, was assassinated while doing what he had devoted his life to: standing before young Americans and challenging them to think, to speak, and to have the courage to stand for what they believe.
There are no words that can adequately describe what this past year has been like.
We have had to lear…
Charlie built a movement with one table, one mic, and students ready to debate.
This fall, a new generation of TPUSA chapters is bringing that movement back to the center of campus 🇺🇸
Learn more: tpusastudents.com/pickupthemic
Remembering his life. Honoring his legacy.
Join us 9/10 at the UCCU Center on the campus of UVU with Glenn Beck, Frank Turek, and more as we reflect on Charlie Kirk’s extraordinary impact: CharlieKirkLegacy.com
“This past week, I have seen something I'm still trying to unpack and put into words, and someone asked me, ‘Do you still want to go to the Chapter Leadership Summit?’... And I thought to myself, ‘You know, if you don't fight for what's right—I would much rather our country look like this room than the inside of that courtroom.’”
Erika Kirk at CLS 2026
“You want to bend the future to your will? Make some of it. Build the thing, start the company, learn the trade, plant the trees whose shade you will never sit under.”
Rob Schneider at CLS 2026
“Charlie Kirk was the Turning Point for the USA.”
The Honorable Pete Hegseth at CLS 2026
❤211🙏45👍15💯4🥰4🏆3💩1🤡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @TPUSA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Sarah Huckabee Sanders @SarahHuckabee · 23,974 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 September 2026
Charlie Kirk @CharlieKirk · 151,701 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
Ryan Fournier @RyanAFournier · 20,541 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 September 2026
Daily Wire Junkies @realDailyWire · 38,890 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
Ben Shapiro Gang @BenShapiroGang · 53,372 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
Dan Bongino @DBongino · 106,897 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 August 2026
Daily Caller @Daily_Caller · 28,872 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 8 September 2026
Ted Cruz @TedCruzTX · 28,337 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
Steven Crowder Fans @StevenCrowder · 50,511 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
Mike Pompeo @MichaelRPompeo · 24,669 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 15 September 2026
Newsmax Clips @NewsmaxTV · 65,373 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
Dinesh D’Souza @DineshJDSouza · 71,631 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
One America News Network @OANNTV · 145,109 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
Benny Johnson @BennyJohnson · 62,999 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 August 2026
James Woods ★★★ @JamesWoodsFans · 73,513 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
Fearless Report @FearlessReport · 95,693 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 16 August 2026
Right Side Broadcasting Network (RSBN) @rsbnetwork · 103,061 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 August 2026
Mark Levin Warroom @MarkRLevin · 39,050 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 August 2026
This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Turning Point USA” (@TPUSA), 47,158 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TPUSA.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.