Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Retards_TikTok

@Retards_TikTok

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,858subscribers

-18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002234514020
TypeChannel
Username@Retards_TikTok
Created25 July 2024measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Retards_TikTok

Growth

5,8585,8765,8676 August 2026 — 5,876 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,876 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,865 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,858 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,855–5,879 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 18:255,858-7
9 Aug 2026, 23:345,865-11
6 Aug 2026, 10:325,876no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:025,876first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 28 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
21m 19s
Average length
1m 11s

Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,670 reactions across 18 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤮48729.2%
💩22213.3%
🤣18911.3%
🍌1488.86%
💯1337.96%
855.09%
👏523.11%
🔥502.99%
😡462.75%
🤬452.69%
422.51%
🫡382.28%
321.92%
🤯271.62%
🥰191.14%
👍140.838%
👀110.659%
😱110.659%
😁90.539%
🤔50.299%
2 further kinds50.299%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,670reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 28 December 2025 to 5 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Jan 2026, 16:15 UTC≈19,000 views99 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

@Retards_TikTok @Retardsoftiktok

👏36💩26🤣138🤮7😡6🍌2🤔1

5 Jan 2026, 15:53 UTC≈18,600 views162 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

The usual suspects @Retards_TikTok @Retardsoftiktok

💩73😡38🍌22🤬98😱5🤮32

3 Jan 2026, 14:03 UTC≈19,200 views77 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Suspected US Apache attack helicopters seen TOTALLY DOMINATING the skies above Caracas, Venezuela while explosions ring out @Retards_TikTok @Retardsoftiktok

🫡30💩29🍌833🔥2🤔1😁1

3 Jan 2026, 13:56 UTC≈11,500 views65 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

U.S. Army Apache attack helicopters are absolutely ANNIHILATING Fort Tiuna in Caracas, Venezuela This is a key military installation in the country’s capital @Retards_TikTok @Retardsoftiktok

🔥33🤮16🫡8🍌322🤣1

3 Jan 2026, 13:08 UTC≈7,860 views37 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

@Retards_TikTok @Retardsoftiktok

🥰12🤮106🔥6🍌3

3 Jan 2026, 13:02 UTC≈7,340 views38 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Footage shows several targets bombed including Generalissimo Francisco de Miranda Air Base, La Guaira Naval Base, Fort Tiuna, and potentially more targets including a refinery in Venezuela. @Retards_TikTok @Retardsoftiktok

11💩119🔥3🍌2🤬2

3 Jan 2026, 12:54 UTC≈6,870 views73 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

President Trump confirmed the U.S. military carried out a “large-scale strike” in Venezuela early Saturday morning and took Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife into custody. @Retards_TikTok @Retardsoftiktok

22🍌18🤬158🔥5🥰5

3 Jan 2026, 04:04 UTC≈7,400 views148 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

STFU and STOP with your nonsense. You are only embarrassing yourself! ………..U…….R……..A………MAN @Retards_TikTok @Retardsoftiktok

🤮116🍌12🤣6💩532🤬2👍1

1 Jan 2026, 02:59 UTC≈8,320 views105 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Ignorance is one thing but this is utter stupidity. Just remember folks these people also vote @Retards_TikTok @Retardsoftiktok

🍌48🤯20🤮19💩103🤣3🥰2

31 Dec 2025, 03:10 UTC≈7,500 views80 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Nick Fuentes: "This is what losing looks like. This is what it feels like to not have a country" @Retards_TikTok @Retardsoftiktok

💯55💩17🤬31🍌1👏1🤔1🤮1

28 Dec 2025, 13:57 UTC≈8,780 views78 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Nick Fuentes "I don't know if they'll try to kill me, but in 2026, this is the year they will try to strike at the head, scattering the sheep so that they can corral them back." @Retards_TikTok @Retardsoftiktok

28💩25👍11💯6🤣3🍌2🤮1😁1

28 Dec 2025, 13:54 UTC≈9,920 views121 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

"I'm a trans man and I'm gay, and I've been pregnant and had an abortion." 👀 @Retards_TikTok @Retardsoftiktok

🤮73🤣21💩10🍌6👌3🤯32🤬2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Retards_TikTok. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 362,772 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Only Street Fighting
@onlyfighting · 219,778
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 13 August 2026
LiveLeak
@leaklive · 143,697
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Retards_TikTok” (@Retards_TikTok), 5,858 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Retards_TikTok.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.