Channel
@mdelabroc
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,306subscribers
-19 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001440893303 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mdelabroc |
| Created | 26 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mdelabroc |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 5,306 | -8 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 5,314 | -8 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:20 | 5,322 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 5,325 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:55 | 5,325 | first reading |
66 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 60 of 66 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 66 (5 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 32,913 |
| Reactions total | 736 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
736 reactions across 60 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 179 | 24.3% | |
| ⚡ | 116 | 15.8% | |
| 🌚 | 77 | 10.5% | |
| 🫡 | 64 | 8.70% | |
| 🤮 | 63 | 8.56% | |
| 🌭 | 57 | 7.74% | |
| 🤬 | 57 | 7.74% | |
| 🔥 | 53 | 7.20% | |
| 😱 | 16 | 2.17% | |
| 🥰 | 16 | 2.17% | |
| 🕊 | 12 | 1.63% | |
| 🗿 | 11 | 1.49% | |
| 🙏 | 9 | 1.22% | |
| 🍌 | 2 | 0.272% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 0.272% | |
| 🎃 | 2 | 0.272% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 60 of the 66 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 736reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 66 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mdelabroc. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 66 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Monty Python man is overdosing on these redpills I don't know quite if there is a comparison that fits, but it's like Mister Rodgers just coming out as an open anti semite or something lmao
⚡15🤣2🌭1🎃1
Photo, posted without a caption
🫡14⚡2🌭1🔥1😱1
In the mid 2000's people discovered that gypsies had also discovered the internet and that they had been issuing wild fighting threats between feuding family clans on youtube, and people must have made absolute bank stitching them together so people could follow the feuds along, they got millions of views back in old youtube
🗿8🌚3⚡1🌭1
Welcome to Buhanka watch, where you discover new ethnic groups you never knew existed, but now you fucking hate them more than hell itself
🌭2
I'd like to laugh react some of the family posts mourning the scums death, but I'd probably find the copper wiring stripped out of my gas meter tomorrow
🤣7🌭1
I have no real insight into what carnies are, but picture carnies, but they thieve and steal wherever they go, but they never do a carnival, and if anyone dares say or do anything to stop them from stealing from them, they are now subject of a generational long blood feud with inbred alcoholics who dream of being a horse breeder (with horses they stole from some one else)
🤣7🌭1
We tolerate a lot of shit from other ethnic groups over there.
🌭1
This would have been the 1800s to the 1920s or so. Even today, I don't see how they could replicate their lifestyle. It is something specifically tailored to the UK and Ireland
🌭1
This is probably why they never managed to establish themselves in America given the amount of Irish immigration over there. They'd either just get shot because no one would tolerate their shit, or they had to assimilate into wider Irish American immigrant communities
🌭1🔥1
Are these people hated in NI as much as everywhere else?
🌭1
Bro, they are fucking hated everywhere, but tbh, I have never really seen much of them here, I seen more of them in England. I think local paramilitaries have long since chased them out having grown tired of their shit. They might be active in Tyrone, Fermanagh and Armagh or something. The local circus that used to come here when I was younger I think were travellers and even they managed to get into some kind of …
🌭1
And like every degenerate ethnic group, they have fabricated their own foundation myth. They will seriously try to justify their criminal existence by saying their ancestors were forced off their land by Cromwell or some shit, and that is why, more than 400 years later, they need to steal that diesels from the local farmers yard or break into some pensioners extension to steal their DVD player. Never mind the fact …
🌭1
Showing the 12 most recent of 66 posts we hold for @mdelabroc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 780,498 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Michael De La Broc -Buhanka watch” (@mdelabroc), 5,306 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mdelabroc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.