8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -131. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35,331–35,502 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 18:35
35,351
-1
11 Aug 2026, 21:53
35,352
-14
10 Aug 2026, 23:37
35,366
-48
9 Aug 2026, 20:31
35,414
-14
8 Aug 2026, 23:11
35,428
-9
8 Aug 2026, 01:26
35,437
-34
7 Aug 2026, 01:36
35,471
-11
6 Aug 2026, 09:48
35,482
first reading
Engagement
32 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.97%
avg views ÷ 35,351 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,530
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 32 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
32 (28 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
112,810
Reactions total
3,806
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 20:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,200
Videos
≈673
Links
≈7,150
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
6m 58s
Average length
1m 45s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,806 reactions across 32 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤮
1,378
36.2%
👍
681
17.9%
🤯
471
12.4%
👎
465
12.2%
🔥
410
10.8%
😢
199
5.23%
😱
158
4.15%
❤
44
1.16%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,806reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owners of a Korean women's spa in Washington state are appealing their case to the Supreme Court after they were forced to accommodate males who still have male genitalia. A trans activist filed a complaint against the business, leading to years of litigation. https://thepostmillennial.com/korean-christians-appeal-to-supreme-court-after-ruling-forcing-them-to-allow-men-into-womens-nude-spa?utm_campaign=64470
The lead coroner in Cincinnati performed an autopsy on the young boy who was tortured to death, allegedly by a pagan trans group. William had so much bruising across his small body that the doctor couldn't find the total. He was bashed to death on the head. https://thepostmillennial.com/revealed-horrific-injuries-violence-suffered-by-7-year-old-ohio-boy-tortured-to-death-by-mother-trans-lovers-coroner?utm_campaign=64…
Is there another trans cult? A 7-year-old Ohio boy with special needs was found bound with duct tape inside a closet after being brutally tortured to death.
He was raised in a pagan antifa trans group with multiple “moms.” My investigation reveals what they likely intended for him.
Read: https://www.ngocomment.com/p/another-trans-cult-7-year-old-victim
You have no idea what trans groups are doing.
Pre-order my upcoming book about my investigation into one of the most violent trans cults you've never heard of.
Human experimentation. Needles. Hormone abuse. Swords. Guns. Death. https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/andy-ngo/the-zizians/9780316599030/
A violent felon once part of the BLM-Antifa autonomous zone (RHAZ) in Portland, Ore. was arrested after allegedly threatening to kill contractors working next door. A raid of his house turned up a cache of illegal firearms. In 2020, Antifa violently occupied the roads around the house to prevent the thugs inside from being evicted. https://thepostmillennial.com/convicted-felon-arrested-at-portlands-red-house-for-stoc…
Another trans cult?
Last week, a 7-year-old Cincinnati boy with special needs was found bound with duct tape inside a closet. He was violently tortured to death.
William Evans-Ellis was raised in a trans group where he served the role of being the shared child of multiple “moms.” An exclusive Ngo Comment investigation reveals what they appeared to want for his future.
https://www.ngocomment.com/p/another-trans-cult…
A Somali migrant has been arrested over the m—rder of a man outside the ICE facility in Portland. Leftists had spread false rumors that ICE killed someone. https://thepostmillennial.com/exclusive-somali-immigrant-identified-as-suspect-arrested-on-murder-charges-in-portland-ice-facility-area-shooting?utm_campaign=64470
More trans violence?
A woman and two men who identify as trans have been charged in Cincinnati over the brutal death of a 7-year-old boy. The woman is the child's mother. https://thepostmillennial.com//breaking-mother-2-trans-identified-males-charged-with-murder-of-ohio-mentally-handicapped-7-year-old?utm_campaign=64470
NEW Ngo report: The alleged killers from the Zizian trans death cult have delayed justice again.
Their latest murder trial has been pushed to 2027. During the four-year delay, the prosecution’s key witness was assassinated before he could testify and one of the suspects attempted three escapes.
READ: https://thepostmillennial.com/andy-ngo-reports-zizian-death-cult-murder-trial-delayed-again?utm_campaign=64470
The DOJ's civil rights division says its investigation into Duke University's law school found evidence that it intentionally discriminated racially against whites and Asians who applied to the program. This violates the Supreme Court ruling. https://thepostmillennial.com/duke-law-illegally-discriminated-against-white-asian-applicants-even-after-supreme-court-affirmative-action-ruling-doj?utm_campaign=64470
There's a century of modern left-wing terrorism and political violence in the U.S. and across the West. Why have we forgotten?
Watch Jenny Holland's interview with me: https://www.ngocomment.com/p/why-have-we-forgotten-about-left
🔥70👍23❤7
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @Andy_Ngo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 39,938 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
James O'Keefe @JamesOKeefeIII · 171,140 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
One America News Network @OANNTV · 148,331 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
Project Veritas @project_veritas · 211,802 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
Charlie Kirk @CharlieKirk · 156,047 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Andy Ngo (Official)” (@Andy_Ngo), 35,351 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Andy_Ngo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.