Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 43 days, net -252. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,228–14,560 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 13:40
14,266
-18
16 Sept 2026, 04:16
14,284
-16
14 Sept 2026, 09:20
14,300
-3
12 Sept 2026, 16:41
14,303
-1
10 Sept 2026, 16:59
14,304
-22
7 Sept 2026, 17:42
14,326
-13
4 Sept 2026, 17:17
14,339
-5
3 Sept 2026, 04:17
14,344
-8
1 Sept 2026, 22:26
14,352
-1
31 Aug 2026, 19:13
14,353
-14
30 Aug 2026, 21:26
14,367
-11
29 Aug 2026, 19:04
14,378
-7
28 Aug 2026, 19:04
14,385
-5
27 Aug 2026, 21:48
14,390
-6
26 Aug 2026, 02:12
14,396
-8
25 Aug 2026, 05:08
14,404
-5
24 Aug 2026, 02:34
14,409
-11
22 Aug 2026, 13:04
14,420
-13
21 Aug 2026, 01:36
14,433
-3
18 Aug 2026, 01:02
14,436
first reading
Engagement
73 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.96%
avg views ÷ 14,266 subscribers
Avg views / post
708
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.68%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 73 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
73 (28 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
7,079
Reactions total
331
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 18:38 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1h 10m
Average length
3m 12s
Measured directly from 22 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,539 reactions across 70 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,213
34.3%
👏
1,038
29.3%
❤
524
14.8%
🤬
313
8.84%
🔥
122
3.45%
💯
111
3.14%
😁
104
2.94%
🙏
38
1.07%
🤣
27
0.763%
🥰
17
0.48%
😱
11
0.311%
🤩
7
0.198%
👀
5
0.141%
🤔
5
0.141%
🎉
3
0.085%
😭
1
0.028%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 73 of the 73 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,706 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
UPDATE: Staffordshire Police and the local council have APPROVED our plans for our 'March for Remigration'!
https://www.britainfirst.org/update_staffordshire_police_and_the_local_council_have_approved_our_plans_for_our_march_for_remigration
After Tamworth, I will be embarking on a nationwide speaking tour that will last up till Christmas. If any community protests want to speak at their demos, get in touch. Paul…..OCS
🇬🇧 BRITAIN FIRST LEADER PAUL GOLDING GIVES UPLIFTING SPEECH AT TAUNTON PATRIOT RALLY
A nationalist group called the 'Somerset Patriots' held a protest march through the town of Taunton at the weekend, campaigning against illegal immigration and open borders.
A lot of people moan online, but do you want to be remembered as one of them?
In just 13 days, Britain First is holding our latest 'March for Remigration' in the town of Tamworth.
If you care, be there!
Saturday 12 September. Meet Tamworth Train Station 12 midday....OCS
Imagine being part of this!
Less than 2 weeks to go!
Onwards to Tamworth for our 'March for Remigration'!
Saturday 12 September. Meet Tamworth Train Station 12 midday....OCS
Only 14 days to go! Book your train ticket, arrange a car share, plan your travel!
Onwards to Tamworth for our 'March for Remigration'!
Saturday 12 September. Meet Tamworth Train Station 12 midday....OCS
Today, I gave a speech at the Somerset Patriots rally in Taunton. Great turnout, despite the horrific rain. Thank you to Terry for inviting me. Got more local speeches coming up! OCS
To show your support for Britain First, please save the logo above, and add it as your profile pic on all your social media accounts. Let's show the world who is the biggest and the best! OCS
Paul Golding is speaking at this event in Taunton, Somerset, tomorrow, meeting 11am.
If you live anywhere near Taunton, come along, listen to his speech, and say hello.......OCS
👍33❤4😁2👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 73 posts we hold for @BritainFirst. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Tommy Robinson News @TommyRobinsonNews · 75,468 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Британия превыше всего(ru.wikipedia.org) “…{{Small|(ныне недоступна, заблокирована администрацией ВКонтакте)}}
* [https://t.me/BritainFirst Телеграм-канал]
{{Партии Великобритании}}{{Перевести|en|Britain…” read 13 September 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Britain First” (@BritainFirst), 14,266 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BritainFirst.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.