Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
38 measurements spanning 64 days, net -2,339. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 48,111–51,152 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 38
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Oct 2026, 02:16
48,462
-141
4 Oct 2026, 12:37
48,603
-293
26 Sept 2026, 06:01
48,896
-247
19 Sept 2026, 10:57
49,143
-77
16 Sept 2026, 22:41
49,220
-48
15 Sept 2026, 00:38
49,268
-53
13 Sept 2026, 12:19
49,321
-71
11 Sept 2026, 18:56
49,392
-86
9 Sept 2026, 09:38
49,478
-131
6 Sept 2026, 01:40
49,609
-93
4 Sept 2026, 00:59
49,702
-75
2 Sept 2026, 12:04
49,777
-38
1 Sept 2026, 10:15
49,815
-39
31 Aug 2026, 06:57
49,854
-42
30 Aug 2026, 09:15
49,896
-35
29 Aug 2026, 08:55
49,931
-45
28 Aug 2026, 12:08
49,976
-26
27 Aug 2026, 08:53
50,002
-46
26 Aug 2026, 08:19
50,048
-43
25 Aug 2026, 11:53
50,091
first reading
Engagement
71 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 134 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.891%
avg views ÷ 48,462 subscribers
Avg views / post
432
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.65%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 71 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 October 2026
Posts held
71 (5 July 2026 – 9 October 2026)
Views total
12,952
Reactions total
343
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Oct 2026, 20:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,510
Videos
≈106
Links
≈2,420
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
6m 01s
Average length
52s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
942 reactions across 68 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
375
39.8%
🔥
316
33.5%
💯
57
6.05%
🙏
49
5.20%
❤🔥
35
3.72%
⚡
22
2.34%
🏆
19
2.02%
🌚
10
1.06%
🤩
9
0.955%
😢
8
0.849%
✍
7
0.743%
🐳
4
0.425%
👍
4
0.425%
🤝
4
0.425%
🦄
4
0.425%
🍓
3
0.318%
🎉
3
0.318%
💋
3
0.318%
🤗
3
0.318%
👻
2
0.212%
4 further kinds
5
0.531%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 70 of the 71 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 971 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 9 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🙏 Остановись! Задумайся! Куда ты живёшь? 🤷♂️
⏰ Большинству людей некогда не просто подумать, а даже некогда прочитать этот пост!
😑 Но есть время на дорогу на нелюбимую работу или полудохлый бизнес!
😑 Есть время на скроллинг ленты, чтобы получить хоть какое-то удовольствие от жизни, ведь бОльшего ты не добился!
😑 Есть время сплетничать и обсуждать других людей или события, на которые ты никак не можешь повлиять!
…
😃 С этим нужно что-то делать! 😠
Я не знаю что! 🤷♂️
Но если ничего не сделать, то ты потом будешь жалеть, а сожаление сожрёт тебя изнутри!
Я никогда не оставляю вопросы нерешёнными!
☝️ Если меня что-то не устраивает в моей жизни - я иду и решаю это:
1️⃣ Если я ещё не достиг какой-то своей мечты, то я не бросаю мечту, я иду искать возможности для её реализации!
2️⃣ Затем я просчитываю возможности здраво, трезво и…
✍️ Когда что-то пишешь - невозможно на этом не концентрироваться! 🤔
✍️ Я постоянно всё записываю! Беру пример с великих! 🏆
👉 Проходя тренинги - записываю все ключевые мысли!
👉 Записываю цели, планы мечты, стратегии!
👉 Прорабатывая свои идеи! Я записываю их даже среди ночи!
☝️ Тем самым я ещё больше направляю свой мозг работать в этом направлении, искать необходимые возможности и придумывать более качественные ид…
🤷♂️ Знаете, что действительно скучно? 🥱
👉 Ваша жизнь через 5 лет, когда вы поняли, что ничего не поменяли!
😃 Вам приходится работать на руководителей среднего звена, которые вымещают на вас свою злобу и отчаяние, пока вы пытаетесь продавать товары и услуги, на которые вам наплевать!
🤷♂️ И всё ради какой-нибудь корпорации, которой на вас тоже абсолютно насрать!
❤️ А мне нет! ❤️
🙅♂️ Я не ожидаю, что вы прям се…
😑 Тебе кажется, что всё только начинается! Но время играет против тебя! ⏰
🤔 Пора задуматься, в каком мире ты хочешь жить и хочешь ли остаться в том мире, в котором живёшь сейчас? 🤷♂️
💪 Принять это РЕШЕНИЕ, а не ждать, когда жизнь закончится, а ты так ни на что и не решился!
⚡️ Начни действовать сегодня!
Ведь завтра твоё «сегодня» превратиться во «вчера»…
С Богом! Обнял 🫂
Дисциплина это искусство не предавать самого себя
Большинство людей воспринимают дисциплину как наказание, ограничение, контроль. На самом деле дисциплина это верность себе будущему. Свобода будущего.
Люди, которые не контролируют свое поведение, зачастую в итоге теряют самоуважение и уверенность в себе.
Потому что в глубине души они знают, как часто они подводят самих себя и предают свой потенциал.
⚡️ Сегодня услышал очень крутую мысль! 🔥
Хочу с вами поделиться на подумать вам на воскресенье :
«Стабильность - это когда остаётся!»
А сколько у вас остаётся каждый месяц с вашей стабильностью?
🤔🤔🤔
🚀 Вчера стартовала наша Формула 1 в Баку с нашим клубом путешественников-предпринимателей! 🔥🎉
Вот как это начиналось! ☝️
Поспамить сюда контентом с формулы 1 ? Жми 🔥
🤔 Что если я - это не я, а тот, кем все вокруг меня считают??? 🤯
❓ Что если вы просто поддались общественному мнению и общему инфо полю?
❓ Что если именно поэтому вы не уверены в себе в новых возможностях, в будущем?
❔ Что если вы на много круче, чем о вас думают?
❓ А что если на самом деле о вас никто не думает? А это вы сами думаете, что о вас кто-то думает и нагружаете сами себя этими страхами и сомнениями?
❓…
Вы хотите быть обычным среднестатистическим человеком?
Да, меня это устраивает!21%
Точно нет, но я пока не знаю чего хочу!4%
Нет!!! Я хочу прожить самую невероятную жизнь!33%
Нет!!! Я хочу прожить самую невероятную легендарную жизнь! И уже действую!47%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Вся правда о зимовке с детьми!
Приходите, расскажу, какие есть подводные камни, как подготовиться, как дети учатся, и есть ли смысл вообще ехать в теплые страны на зиму 🫶
Тут будет ссылка на зум👍
27 сентября в 13:00 по мск
https://t.me/krasnikovy
🔥6❤4🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 71 posts we hold for @myflem. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@myflem edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
13 August 2026
Most recent edit
13 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Вы хотите быть обычным среднестатистическим человеком?
Да, меня это устраивает!21%
Точно нет, но я пока не знаю чего хочу!4%
Нет!!! Я хочу прожить самую невероятную жизнь!33%
Нет!!! Я хочу прожить самую невероятную легендарную жизнь! И уже действую!47%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 9 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
OnlyFacts @only_facts_news · 19,122 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 2 October 2026
Активы / Е. Ходченков/ @hodchenkov · 53,139 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 August 2026
Coin Side | AI х заработок @coinside_public · 27,133 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 September 2026
Андрей Меркулов | Покупаю → Ремонтирую → Сдаю @andrewmerkulov · 26,343 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 September 2026
Danila Prozorov @danilaprobiz · 22,074 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 20 September 2026
GM Crypto @gm_cryp · 33,554 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 3 September 2026
🖖 Поток Лилы @LeelaPotok · 21,509 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 22 September 2026
ULTRADE Announcements @ULTRADE_Announcement · 30,007 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
Pictographs.io | ENG News @pictographs_official · 85,773 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 25 August 2026
آساکوین | Asacoine @asacoine · 123,574 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Иван Красников Life” (@myflem), 48,462 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/myflem.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.