National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 464 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (3 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 24 comparable posts for this entry, running 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 464, the earliest publisher we hold is @akharinkhabar. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Views per post sit far above this size band
28,100 average views per post against 18,215 subscribers — an engagement rate of 154.1%. Across the 7,490 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,001–31,611 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 3.83% and 17.6%, with a median of 8.86%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Posts measured
70 of 70 published in the window (37 exact, 33 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
1,964,306
Mature posts only
145.2% over 59 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the keys clone_source · err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 463 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
413 more channels are in this same group but not listed individually here.
Growth
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -81. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,203–18,308 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 18:43
18,215
-9
10 Aug 2026, 22:42
18,224
-10
9 Aug 2026, 21:33
18,234
-15
8 Aug 2026, 22:28
18,249
-12
8 Aug 2026, 01:21
18,261
-24
7 Aug 2026, 01:21
18,285
-9
6 Aug 2026, 03:40
18,294
-2
6 Aug 2026, 02:16
18,296
no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:48
18,296
first reading
Engagement
82 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
145.0%
avg views ÷ 18,215 subscribers
Avg views / post
26,400
82 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
82
of 82 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
82 (2 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
2,165,347
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 00:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,360
Videos
≈5,010
Links
≈1,410
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 21m
Average length
3m 24s
Measured directly from 24 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
♦️والاستریت ژورنال: کشورهای خلیج فارس مدیریت ایران بر تنگه هرمز را به جنگ ترجیح میدهند
والاستریت ژورنال:
🔹کشورهای حاشیه خلیج فارس در حال پذیرش یک وضعیت عادی جدید هستند که در آن ایران کنترل تنگه هرمز را در دست دارد. مقامات خلیج فارس نگران این هستند که جایگزین این وضعیت، یعنی بازگشت به جنگ، بسیار بدتر باشد.
🔹آنها توافق در دست بررسی برای بازگشایی تنگه را که کنترل ایران بر کشتیهای ورودی را رسمی میکند، دوست ندارند، …
♦️بازار بورس ۶۰ درصد کوچکتر شد
🔹ارزش دلاری بورس تهران از بیش از ۲۰۰ میلیارد دلار در ابتدای ۱۴۰۰ به کمتر از ۸۰ میلیارد دلار رسیده است.
🔹سطحی که در زمره پایینترین سطوح تاریخی بازار قرار دارد. بر همین اساس، کاهش ریسکهای سیاسی میتواند جرقهای برای رشد فراگیر بورس باشد. /خبرفوری
🇮🇷 ✊ @AkhbareFori | Link
♦️دبیر کمیسیون امنیت ملی: ادعای خروج ۸ میلیون بشکه نفت از خلیج فارس توسط آمریکا کذب است
بهنام سعیدی، دبیر کمیسیون امنیت ملی مجلس در #گفتگو با خبرفوری:
🔹ادعای خروج نفت از خلیج فارس توسط آمریکا کذب است و در راستای جنگ روانی آمریکا مطرح شده، هیچ خروج نفتی با اقدام یا اجازه آمریکا صورت نگرفته است.
🔹تنگه هرمز در اختیار نیروهای مسلح جمهوری اسلامی ایران است و هرگونه عبور و مرور از این آبراه فقط با مجوز ایران انجام میشود و…
♦️آتلانتیک: ترامپ درباره ایران وارد فاز «صبر و انتظار» شد
ادعای آتلانتیک:
🔹دونالد ترامپ در قبال ایران بهتدریج رویکرد «صبر و انتظار» را در پیش گرفته است. کاخ سفید اکنون بیش از گذشته روی تحریمهای اقتصادی و محاصره دریایی حساب باز کرده تا تهران را به مذاکره وادار کند.
🔹حملات نظامی اخیر، برخلاف انتظار، نتوانسته به درگیری پایان دهد./ خبرفوری
🇮🇷 ✊ @AkhbareFori | Link
♦️گاردین: با آتشبس هم میل ایران برای کشتن ترامپ کم نمیشود
ادعای گاردین:
🔹تغییر پرواز مخفیانه ترامپ نشان دهنده شدت تهدید ترور از سوی ایران است. اقدامات غیرمعمول برای محافظت از رئیس جمهور در حالی که به طور بالقوه دیگران را در معرض خطر قرار میدهد، «ظاهر خوبی ندارد» و خطر «ضعیف» جلوه دادن او را به همراه دارد.
🔹حتی یک آتشبس یا توافق صلح که به جنگ پایان دهد، «میل آنها برای کشتن ترامپ را از بین نمیبرد»./ خبرفوری
🇮🇷 ✊ …
♦️چه کسی تصمیم گرفت ما خاورمیانه باشیم
🔹شاید تا به حال فکر نکرده باشید که چرا منطقه غرب آسیا را خاورمیانه میگویند.
🔹دسیسهای عجیب پشت ایننامگذاری است. و باز هم پای انگلیس در میان است. ماجرا را در این ویدئو ببینید.
@Tv_Fori
♦️موتورسیکلتهای ایران چینی شد
اصغر فرضیپور، رئیس اتحادیه موتورسیکلت فروشان در #گفتگو با خبرفوری:
🔹بیش از ۹۰ درصد موتورسیکلتهای موجود در بازار از چین وارد میشوند و با نامشخص شدن مبادی ورود کالا روند تأمین قطعات با دشواری بیشتری همراه شده و این عامل نیز به افزایش قیمت دامن زده است.
🔹تولیدکنندگان داخلی با هزاران مانع اداری و تأمین مواد اولیه مواجه هستند.
@Tv_Fori
♦️ایران هشتم جهان در مالکیت رمزارز؛ ۱۵ میلیون ایرانی رمزارز دارند
🔹بر اساس گزارش TechRasa Insight، حدود ۱۵ میلیون ایرانی در سال ۱۴۰۳ مالک رمزارز بودهاند. این داده بیانگر این است که ۱۶.۷ درصد جمعیت کشور، رمزارز دارند.
🔹این نرخ حدود ۲.۴ برابر میانگین جهانی است و ایران را در میان ۳۱ کشور بررسیشده، در رتبه هشتم جهان قرار داده است. /خبرفوری
🇮🇷 ✊ @AkhbareFori | Link
♦️نیویورکتایمز: ایران موشکهای پیشرفتهای دارد که میتواند ناگهان تغییر مسیر دهد و سامانههای دفاعی آمریکا را در هم بکوبد
نیویورکتایمز:
🔹آمریکاییها با توان جدید ایران مجبور شدند تا ذخایر کمیاب رهگیرهای پاتریوت را بسوزانند. ایران در دور اخیر جنگ با استفاده از موشکهای پیشرفتهای که میتوانند ناگهان مسیر خود را تغییر دهند، سیستمهای دفاعی پایگاههای آمریکا را در هم کوبید.
🔹ایران با پیشرفت جنگ به دشمن ماهرتری تبدیل …
♦️سوپرمارکتها چه میفروشند و سودشان کجاست؟
🔹بر اساس گزارش سالانه بازارهای خرده فروشی، لبنیات با سهم ۲۰.۴ درصد، صدرنشین است. خواروبار و کالاهای اساسی با ۱۹.۴ درصد و شیرینی و تنقلات با ۱۶.۶ درصد در رتبههای بعدی قرار دارند.
🔹نوشیدنیها ۱۴.۱ درصد، شوینده و بهداشتی ۱۳.۶ درصد، دخانیات ۹.۳ درصد، یخچالی و انجمادی ۴.۲ درصد و لوازم مصرفی ۲.۴ درصد از بازار را به خود اختصاص دادهاند. چهار گروه نخست رویهمرفته بیش از ۷۰ درصد …
♦️آقای ترامپ! ایران نه ژاپن است، نه ویتنام...
🔹یک فرمول قدیمی در واشنگتن وجود دارد؛ بمباران کن، هزینه بساز، محاسبات طرف مقابل را تغییر بده و بعد پای میز مذاکره بنشین. آیا «مذاکره با بمب» در برابر ایران جواب میدهد؟
🔹این ویدئو روایتی است که حالا سردمداران کاخ سفید به آن رسیدهاند.
@Tv_Fori
♦️ایران را با ماشینحساب نمیشود فهمید!
🔹شاید مسئله آمریکا، قدرت ایران نباشد؛ مسئله، اشتباه در فهم ایران باشد.
🔹سالهاست واشنگتن با یک فرمول ساده به جهان نگاه میکند؛ فشار را بیشتر کن، هزینه مقاومت را بالا ببر، و سرانجام طرف مقابل را پای میز تسلیم بنشان.
🔹اما ایران را نمیشود فقط با ماشینحساب سنجید.
🔹اینجا، در کنار اقتصاد و منفعت، مفاهیمی زندگی میکنند که گاهی از سود و زیان مادی مهمترند؛ عزت، استقلال، حافظه تاریخی…
Showing the 12 most recent of 82 posts we hold for @TV_Fori. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 145,703 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TV فوری” (@TV_Fori), 18,215 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TV_Fori.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.