International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 12 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 464 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 22 of the 449 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 1,024 comparable posts for this entry, running 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 464, the earliest publisher we hold is @akharinkhabar. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 463 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
413 more channels are in this same group but not listed individually here.
Growth
16 measurements spanning 7 days, net +6,174. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 969,529–1,018,702 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 20:27
999,779
-13,249
12 Aug 2026, 09:33
1,013,028
+36,579
12 Aug 2026, 00:02
976,449
+1,246
11 Aug 2026, 10:27
975,203
-3,751
10 Aug 2026, 21:41
978,954
-2,024
10 Aug 2026, 07:10
980,978
+2,696
10 Aug 2026, 00:01
978,282
-2,995
9 Aug 2026, 03:52
981,277
-511
8 Aug 2026, 21:56
981,788
-3,595
8 Aug 2026, 05:20
985,383
-2,418
7 Aug 2026, 18:55
987,801
-2,702
7 Aug 2026, 03:27
990,503
-761
6 Aug 2026, 15:41
991,264
-1,074
6 Aug 2026, 03:30
992,338
-957
6 Aug 2026, 00:43
993,295
-310
6 Aug 2026, 00:41
993,605
first reading
Engagement
1,515 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 78 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.534%
avg views ÷ 999,779 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,340
1,515 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1,515
of 1,515 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
1,515 (27 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
8,082,863
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
28m 56s
Average length
1m 00s
Measured directly from 29 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 116 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 3of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 1.9 hours of being posted; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 5,470 views — 0.552% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 5,544).
8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
60 minutes: 1,707 interp.still climbing at last reading
not yet at 24h
27 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
هموطنانی که به عراق سفر کردند، از فهرست کالابرگ هموطنان مقیم خارج کشور خارج شدند
🔹وزارت تعاون، کار و رفاه اجتماعی با انتشار اطلاعیهای از هموطنانی که به علت سفر به عراق، مقیم خارج از کشور شناسایی شدند خواست جهت فعالسازی کالابرگ مرداد ماه خود، تا اطلاع بعدی به دفاتر پیشخوان دولت مراجعه نکنند.
🔹جزئیات سفر هموطنان به عراق، هفته آینده، دوباره بررسی و اطلاعرسانی خواهد شد.
📌 @parsine
🔹سفیر پاکستان در مسکو تاکید کرد اسلامآباد هیچ مخالفتی با پیوستن ایران و مصر به توافقنامه دفاعی مشترک با آنکارا و ریاض تحت عنوان توافق مکه ندارد
📌 @parsine
بلومبرگ: ایران خود را برای «جنگ بعدی» آماده میکند
🔹 بلومبرگ گزارش داده ایران با بازسازماندهی ساختار نظامی و امنیتی خود، بهدنبال ایجاد نیرویی تهاجمیتر و آمادهتر برای درگیریهای طولانیمدت است. این تغییرات میتواند نشانهای از آمادگی تهران برای مواجهههای نظامی آینده باشد.
📌 @parsine
گزارش رویترز از عملیات «مخفیانه» بارگیری نفت عربستان در بندر ینبع
🔹خبرگزاری رویترز به نقل از دادههای شرکت «فورتکسا» گزارش داد که تمامی عملیات بارگیری نفت خام عربستان در بندر «ینبع» طی هفته گذشته به صورت مخفیانه و بدون اعلام رسمی مقصد یا هویت کامل محمولهها انجام شده است.
📌 @parsine
رویترز: هیچ گفتوگویی میان ایران و آمریکا برای تمدید آتشبس در جریان نیست
🔹یک مقام ارشد ایرانی به رویترز گفت: تهران تمدید آتشبس با آمریکا را موضوعی در دست مذاکره نمیداند و تأکید کرد توافقی برای تمدید وجود ندارد. این اظهارات در واکنش به گزارش آناتولی درباره توافق دو طرف برای تمدید ۶۰روزه آتشبس مطرح شده است.
📌 @parsine
نشت نفت به سواحل جنوبشرق عمان رسید
🔹سازمان محیطزیست عمان اعلام کرد لکه نفتی ناشی از نشت یک نفتکش به گلنشسته، به سواحل جنوبشرقی این کشور رسیده است.
🔹این نهاد رسمی هشدار داد آلودگی نفتی پس از سرریز از نفتکش آسیبدیده، به نوار ساحلی جنوبشرق عمان گسترش یافته است.
📌 @parsine
منبع مطلع به العربیه: میانجی پاکستانی در تلاش است آتشبس ۶۰ روزه را تمدید کند
🔹پاکستان تلاش میکند با تمدید آتشبس ۶۰ روزه، مسیر دیپلماتیک را باز نگه دارد.
🔹میانجیها برای رسیدگی به پروندهها و مسائل حلنشده میان آمریکا و ایران، به زمان بیشتری نیاز دارند.
🔹میانجی پاکستانی نسبت به تمدید دوره ۶۰ روزه آتشبس ابراز خوشبینی کرده است.
📌 @parsine
روسیه یک کشتی و نفتکش مرتبط با اوکراین را در بندر اودسا هدف گرفت
🔹وزارت دفاع روسیه روز چهارشنبه اعلام کرد نیروهای روسی در بندر اودسا یک کشتی فلهبر حامل تجهیزات نظامی و یک نفتکش حامل سوخت برای نیروهای مسلح اوکراین را هدف قرار دادهاند.
📌 @parsine
ادعای ترامپ : آنها پول ندارند؛ کشورشان «داغان شده است»؛ تمام چیزی که برایشان باقی مانده، اخبار جعلی و تورم ۳۰۰ درصدی است که روزبهروز هم بدتر میشود
🔹ایران فقط حرف میزند و هیچ اقدامی نمیکند؛ دیگر قلدر خاورمیانه نیست.
📌 @parsine
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,515 posts we hold for @parsinehnews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 117,403 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 35 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
خبر ایران | irNews @irnews · 652,990 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 August 2026
آخرین اخبار @irantopnews · 186,887 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 August 2026
عصر فردا @asrefarda_ir · 1,186,070 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 August 2026
خبر فوری جنگ ایران @irzagrosnews · 1,361,706 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 8 August 2026
خبرازما @KhabarAzMa · 147,812 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
اخبار داغ @akhbardaq · 317,193 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 August 2026
صرفا جهت اطلاع @serfan_jahate_ettela · 260,580 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
هم صدا @hamsedair · 1,261,929 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 8 August 2026
کانال خبر ویژه 💯 @Khabare_vije · 1,257,370 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 August 2026
حوادث روز @havades_roz · 258,165 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
توییتر فارسی @OfficialPersia_Twitter · 183,156 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 August 2026
کانال رسمی صابرین نیوز @saberinfa · 482,883 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 August 2026
خبرآنلاین @khabr_onlin · 261,594 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
خبر فوری مهم @irforinews · 271,792 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 August 2026
اخبار منتخب @akhbar_montakhab · 582,840 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
اخبار فوری گِرونی @geroni_news · 650,456 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 August 2026
خبر ویژه @khabarevijh · 408,481 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
تیتر تجارت @titretejarat · 636,248 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 8 August 2026
فرارو @fararunews · 208,171 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 11 August 2026
اخبار فوری تهران🔖 @fouri_tehran · 210,369 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 11 August 2026
ایران نیوز @IranNews · 398,229 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
خبرفوری/ عصر فوری @asrefori · 1,050,404 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 8 August 2026
خبرگزاری مهر @mehrnews · 297,077 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 10 August 2026
تلویزیون روایت فردا | RFT @revayatfarda · 205,315 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 28 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
21 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
www.bsi.irregistrable domain: bsi.ir4 posts · 29 July 2026 – 6 August 2026 · example post
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کانال خبری پارسینه” (@parsinehnews), 999,779 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/parsinehnews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.