Channel
@MaPesara
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
17,235subscribers
-204 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001458236746 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MaPesara |
| Created | 16 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MaPesara |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 464 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @NPROXY/2748511 Apr 2026, 13:13 UTC | @MaPesara/52975 · this entry11 Apr 2026, 13:17 UTC | 1.00 | 4 minutes |
| @NPROXY/2749011 Apr 2026, 13:39 UTC | @MaPesara/52976 · this entry11 Apr 2026, 13:42 UTC | 1.00 | 4 minutes |
| @NPROXY/2752211 Apr 2026, 16:51 UTC | @MaPesara/52980 · this entry11 Apr 2026, 17:12 UTC | 1.00 | 21 minutes |
| @NPROXY/2755711 Apr 2026, 19:30 UTC | @MaPesara/52985 · this entry11 Apr 2026, 20:08 UTC | 1.00 | 38 minutes |
| @NPROXY/2762212 Apr 2026, 04:33 UTC | @MaPesara/52986 · this entry12 Apr 2026, 04:45 UTC | 1.00 | 12 minutes |
| @NPROXY/2761412 Apr 2026, 03:06 UTC | @MaPesara/52988 · this entry12 Apr 2026, 04:47 UTC | 1.00 | 1.7 hours |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @NPROXY | 7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 21 minutes | @NPROXY (7–0) |
| @pezeshkian_com | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.98 | 22 minutes | @pezeshkian_com (5–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 12 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 10 comparable posts for this entry, running 11 April 2026 to 12 April 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 464, the earliest publisher we hold is @akharinkhabar. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 463 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
413 more channels are in this same group but not listed individually here.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 17,235 | -30 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:55 | 17,265 | -20 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:33 | 17,285 | -34 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:52 | 17,319 | -40 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 17,359 | -21 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:23 | 17,380 | -44 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:53 | 17,424 | -15 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 17,439 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 11 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
♨️ بازگشایی چند وبسایت در ایران؛ احتمال اتصال تدریجی اینترنت مطرح است چهار وبسایت بازگشایی شدهاند. مشخص نیست این مسئله ناشی از یک اختلال است یا ادامهدار خواهد بود. همچنین معلوم نیست بازگشایی، محدود به این چهار وبسایت است یا وبسایتهای بیشتری نیز در دسترس قرار گرفتهاند. این چهار وبسایت عبارتاند از Vercel، Next.js، SourceForge که در زمینه برنامهنویسی فعال هستند و وبسایت Let's Encrypt که مرجع صدور رایگان گو…
ولایتی: برای صیانت از ایران عزیز، کلید «تنگه هرمز» در دستان مقتدر ماست
🔴توئیت علی قلهکی خبرنگار : سلامتِ هیئت ایرانی مذاکره کننده ایرانی تا اینکه به تهران برسن بر عهده پاکستانه
🔴عربستان سعودی اعلام کرد حدود 13 هزار نیروی نظامی پاکستان و همچنین 10 تا 18 فروند جنگنده نیروی هوایی پاکستان رو در چارچوب توافق دفاعی مشترک به پایگاه هوایی «ملک عبدالعزیز» در بخش شرقی این کشور مستقر کرده طبق این توافق، حمله به یکی از طرفین بهعنوان حمله به طرف دیگر تلقی خواهد شد
ادعای ونس: ایرانیها ترجیح دادند شرایط ما را نپذیرند بدون توافق به آمریکا باز میگردیم یک متن پیشنهادی تفاهمنامه ارائه کردیم؛ این آخرین و بهترین پیشنهاد است؛ باید ببینیم آیا ایرانیها آن را میپذیرند یا خیر
🔴 یک منبع آگاه: توپ در زمین آمریکاست و ایران عجلهای در مذاکرات ندارد 🔹 یک منبع آگاه: ایران ابتکارها و پیشنهادهای معقولی در مذاکرات مطرح کرد؛ توپ در زمین آمریکاست که با واقع گرایی به مسائل نگاه کند. 🔹دولت آمریکا همچنان که در محاسبات جنگی شکست خورد، در محاسبات مذاکراتی نیز تاکنون خطا کرده است. 🔹ایران عجلهای ندارد و تا زمانی که آمریکا به توافق معقول تن ندهد، تغییری در وضعیت تنگهٔ هرمز ایجاد نخواهد شد.
🎦 سخنگوی وزارت خارجه: در مورد یکسری از موضوعات به تفاهم رسیدیم اما نهایتاً گفتگوها به توافق منجر نشد
اکسیوس: اختلافات اصلی در ۲۱ ساعت مذاکره ایران و ایالات متحده، مربوط به درخواست ایران برای کنترل تنگه هرمز و امتناع از واگذاری ذخایر اورانیوم غنیشده بود
🔴 مذاکرات ایران و آمریکا بیش از ۷ ساعت همچنان ادامه دارد. 📷 تصویر: سالن جناح اسلامآباد - محل حضور رسانههای بینالمللی در روبهروی هتل سرینا
✅ سخنگوی قرارگاه مرکزی خاتمالانبیا: ادعای فرمانده سنتکام مبنیبر نزدیک شدن و ورود شناورهای آمریکایی به تنگه هرمز، قویا تکذیب میگردد و ابتکار عمل برای عبور و مرور هر شناوری در اختیار نیروهای مسلح جمهوری اسلامی ایران میباشد.
️صدا وسیما: اختلافات جدی وجود دارد ولی تلاشهای دو طرف در لحظات آخر فعال است
نتانیاهو: جنگ با ایران تمام نشده هنوز کارهای زیادی برای انجام دادن داریم!
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @MaPesara. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 480,613 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ما پسرا ™” (@MaPesara), 17,235 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MaPesara.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.