6 measurements spanning 10 days, net +34. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,314–6,358 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 15:08
6,353
+10
12 Aug 2026, 19:33
6,343
+10
9 Aug 2026, 15:17
6,333
+9
6 Aug 2026, 21:25
6,324
+5
6 Aug 2026, 10:30
6,319
no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:01
6,319
first reading
Engagement
149 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.39%
avg views ÷ 6,353 subscribers
Avg views / post
152
149 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
149
of 149 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 115 of 149 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
149 (6 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
22,658
Reactions total
400
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 03:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
52m 15s
Average length
1m 25s
Measured directly from 37 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
400 reactions across 114 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
135
33.8%
👌
121
30.3%
😁
43
10.8%
👏
42
10.5%
😡
32
8.00%
🔥
8
2.00%
😢
7
1.75%
🫡
7
1.75%
😐
5
1.25%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 115 of the 149 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 400reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 149 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 149 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kayhan_online. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 149 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
📹 ایرانیها اوباش هستند، چون تسلیم نمیشوند
🔸مایک پمپئو، وزیر خارجه سابق ترامپ:
🔸"ایرانیها هنوز حاضر نیستند تسلیم بشوند؛ نه به این دلیل که مذاکرهکنندگان خوبی نیستند، بلکه چون اصلاً اهل معامله نیستند؛ آنها تروریستها و اوباشی هستند که میخواهند اسرائیل و ایالات متحده آمریکا را نابود کنند. بنابراین، محاصره باید ادامه پیدا کند؛ نه برای فشار آوردن به مردم ایران، بلکه برای تحت فشار قرار دادن خود رژیم ...
🔸یکی از اهدا…
🔰اعتراف تحلیلگر اسرائیلی: ایران، تنها نقطه امید بشریت در برابر سلطه صهیونیسم بر غرب است
🔸آلون میزراحی، تحلیلگر سیاسی و فعال رسانهای اسرائیلی-آمریکایی:
🔸تمام جهان غرب به یک فاحشهخانه انحصاریِ صهیونیستی تبدیل شده و اگر ایران نبود، بشریت هیچ امیدی به آینده نداشت.
🔘 بله | ایتا | سروش+ | اینستاگرام | تلگرام
@Kayhan_Online
📹 حملۀ پهپادی به یک نیروگاه برق در لیبی
🔸الجزیره گزارش داد که نیروگاه برق الزاویه هدف حملات هواپیماهای بدون سرنشین قرار گرفته است.
🔸پیشتر بخشی از یک مخزن در پالایشگاه «الزاویه» هدف حملۀ قرار گرفته بود.
🔸هنوز هیچ گروهی مسئولیت این حملات را بر عهده نگرفته است.
🔘 بله | ایتا | سروش+ | اینستاگرام | تلگرام
@Kayhan_Online
📹 قدرت ایران در مسدود نگه داشتن تنگه هرمز ترامپ را به هذیان گویی انداخت:
ما کنترل کامل تنگه هرمز را در اختیار داریم؛ ایران کنترل ندارد؛ ما کنترل کامل را داریم؛ تنگه هرمز مال ماست
🔸رئیس جمهور آمریکا بامداد چهارشنبه ضمن تکرار ادعای کنترل بر تنگه هرمز، گفت که به ایران اعتماد ندارد.
🔸ترامپ گفت: ما در حال حاضر کنترل کامل تنگه هرمز را در اختیار داریم. آنها کنترل آن را ندارند؛ ما کنترل کامل را داریم. تنگه هرمز مال ماست
🔸…
🔰️تامی ویتور، مفسر سیاسی و سخنگوی سابق شورای امنیت ملی آمریکا :تصویری که در ذهن از ترامپ در حال پنهان شدن از ایران داخل یک کامیون حمل غذا شکل میگیرد، ویرانگر است.
🔸پیرمردی ضعیف و احمق که از پیامدهای تصمیم خودش پنهان شده
🔘 بله | ایتا | سروش+ | اینستاگرام | تلگرام
@Kayhan_Online
🔰 این جنایتکاران آرزوی مرگی آرام را به گور خواهند برد
🔸رهبر معظم انقلاب: این جنایتکاران که فهرستی از صدر تا ذیلشان موجود است، آرزوی مرگی آرام و در بستر را با خود به گور خواهند برد.
🔺بخشی از پیام رهبر معظّم انقلاب بهمناسبت تشییع و تدفین آقای شهید ایران | ۱۸/تیر/۱۴۰۵
🔘 بله | ایتا | سروش+ | اینستاگرام | تلگرام
@Kayhan_Online
📹 سردار نقدی، مشاور عالی فرمانده کل سپاه پاسداران: سپاه باید آماده عملیات هوشمندانه در خاک دشمن باشد
🔸هر موقع اقتضا کند و فرمان صادر شود، باید بتوانیم عملیات را به خاک دشمن، به سرزمینهای دشمن بکشیم و دور از سرزمین خودمان بتوانیم عملیات انجام دهیم.
🔺اینها ویژگیهای دکترین تهاجمی است که باید احراز شود؛ یعنی الان سپاه مکلف شده که این آمادگی را کسب کند، این توانمندی را در خودش ایجاد کند که بتواند این کار را در موقع م…
📹 صمصامی، نماینده مجلس: جهش تورم و ریشۀ اعتراضات دی ماه گذشته، سیاستهای غلط ارزی دولت بود/ کمبود ارز نداشتیم، دولت از ترس افزایش نقدینگی، ارز را گران کرد اما هم چوب را خوردیم و هم پیاز را
🔸از هیئت رئیسه میخواهیم طرح تقویت پول ملی را که میتواند بخشی از مشکل تورم جامعه را حل کند، در دستور کار قرار دهد.
🔘 بله | ایتا | سروش+ | اینستاگرام | تلگرام
@Kayhan_Online
📹 بعد از دو ماه عزاداری، دلت گرفته و نگرانی؟
🔸«مراقب عشق حسین باش...»
🔘 بله | ایتا | سروش+ | اینستاگرام | تلگرام
@Kayhan_Online
❤8😡1
Signed A2
Showing the 12 most recent of 149 posts we hold for @kayhan_online. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 178,854 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
قدس آنلاین @qudsonline · 206,275 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 11 August 2026
روزپلاس @roozplus_ir · 203,120 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 August 2026
قیمت آنلاین و اخبار اقتصادی @Currency_Goold · 390,896 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 11 August 2026
تلویزیون روایت فردا | RFT @revayatfarda · 205,799 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 August 2026
همشهری @hamshahrinews · 91,578 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 17 August 2026
اخبار جنگ / خبر یک خطی @khabar1khatti1400 · 229,888 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 August 2026
اخبار رهبر شهید انقلاب 🇮🇷 @khamenei_irnews · 523,888 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 9 August 2026
خبرگزاری مهر @mehrnews · 316,405 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 10 August 2026
شبکه راوی @raavionline1 · 105,498 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 16 August 2026
تابناک | Tabnak @tabnak · 203,672 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 11 August 2026
نورنیوز @Nournews_ir · 234,804 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
ایران اقتصادی | اخبار مهم @iran_eghtesadi · 103,268 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 August 2026
خبرگزاری بین المللی شفقنا @shafaqna_farsi · 95,945 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 16 August 2026
SNN.ir|خبرگزاری دانشجو @snntv · 121,373 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 August 2026
خبرگزاری جمهوری اسلامی - ایرنا @irna_1313 · 144,007 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
Tabnak | تابناک @TeleTabnak · 193,438 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 August 2026
چندثانیه آنلاین @chandsanieh_news · 134,708 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 13 August 2026
باشگاه خبرنگاران جوان @yjcnewschannel · 119,101 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 August 2026
خبرفوری/ عصر فوری @asrefori · 1,204,545 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 8 August 2026
اصلاحات نیوز - پرس @Eslahatinews · 90,796 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 17 August 2026
ایسنا @isna94 · 124,716 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 13 August 2026
عصر ایران @MyAsriran · 118,486 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 August 2026
فرارو @fararunews · 200,152 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 11 August 2026
تَلخندسیاسی اجتماعی @Talkhand_Siyasi2 · 91,069 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 31 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کیهان آنلاین” (@kayhan_online), 6,353 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kayhan_online.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.