Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for КЛИНЦЕВИЧ

Channel

КЛИНЦЕВИЧ

@aklintsevich

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

53,832subscribers

+14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001275632069
TypeChannel
Username@aklintsevich
Created23 February 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/aklintsevich

Growth

53,80953,85953,8346 August 2026 — 53,818 subscribers6 August 2026 — 53,818 subscribers6 August 2026 — 53,822 subscribers8 August 2026 — 53,817 subscribers9 August 2026 — 53,809 subscribers10 August 2026 — 53,810 subscribers11 August 2026 — 53,832 subscribers12 August 2026 — 53,859 subscribers13 August 2026 — 53,858 subscribers14 August 2026 — 53,852 subscribers16 August 2026 — 53,832 subscribers53,8326 August 202616 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 10 days, net +14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 53,802–53,867 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 03:2253,832-20
14 Aug 2026, 09:5753,852-6
13 Aug 2026, 03:5553,858-1
12 Aug 2026, 05:4853,859+27
11 Aug 2026, 04:1353,832+22
10 Aug 2026, 03:1153,810+1
9 Aug 2026, 01:2053,809-8
8 Aug 2026, 01:4853,817-5
6 Aug 2026, 23:3753,822+4
6 Aug 2026, 01:4553,818no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:4853,818first reading

Engagement

96 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.9%
avg views ÷ 53,832 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,120
93 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
96
of 96 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held96 (2 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total848,320
Reactions total17,797
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 02:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2h 23m
Average length
4m 13s

Measured directly from 34 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

14,274 reactions across 77 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5,85441.0%
🔥2,16415.2%
1,72112.1%
🤬1,45110.2%
👏8055.64%
😁6474.53%
👌6304.41%
🤔5924.15%
😱3542.48%
😢190.133%
🤯140.098%
🎉90.063%
🥰70.049%
🆒30.021%
🤩30.021%
😘10.007%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 93 of the 96 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17,797reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 96 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 93 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @aklintsevich. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 96 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 19:21 UTC≈2,960 views125 reactionsread 16 August 2026

The Jerusalem Post признаёт: тысячи ударов не решили ракетную проблему Ирана. По оценке издания, Тегеран восстанавливает производство баллистических ракет значительно быстрее, чем рассчитывали в Израиле, и при выпуске 100-300 ракет ежемесячно может вернуть арсенал к довоенному уровню уже к началу или середине 2027 года. А к 2028-му Иран вновь станет для Израиля одной из ключевых стратегических угроз. Это, собственн

👍9820👏4🔥3

15 Aug 2026, 19:17 UTC≈2,990 views91 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Южная Корея предложила КНДР закончить войну, которая на бумаге не завершена уже 73 года. Президент Ли Чжэ Мён призвал перейти от перемирия 1953 года к полноценному мирному соглашению и начать прямой диалог без взаимных угроз. Корейская война завершилась не миром, а соглашением о прекращении огня. Поэтому формально Север и Юг до сих пор остаются в состоянии войны, а демилитаризованная зона - это один из самых вооружё

👌54🤬22🔥83👏3🤔1

15 Aug 2026, 19:14 UTC≈2,740 views72 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

В Варшаве проходит крупнейший в истории Польши военный парад. Около 1,8 тысячи военнослужащих, свыше 300 единиц техники, более 60 самолётов и вертолётов. Abrams, K2, Leopard, HIMARS, Patriot, F-35 - всё, что должно убедить поляков и соседей: страна готовится быть главным военным форпостом восточного фланга НАТО. На парад пригласили американцев, канадцев, австралийцев, литовцев, эстонцев, шведов, румын и других союзн

😁4712👍8🤔2🤬2👌1

15 Aug 2026, 17:54 UTC≈3,690 views124 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

По данным немецких СМИ, жара превратила часть Балтики в токсичный суп. Сине-зелёные водоросли, они же цианобактерии, массово пошли вдоль побережья от Ростока до Хиддензее, добрались до датских вод и заполнили озёра Мекленбурга-Передней Померании и Шлезвиг-Гольштейна. Контакт с этой «летней идиллией» может закончиться раздражением кожи и слизистых, аллергической реакцией, а проглоченная вода - тошнотой и рвотой. В ч

😱51😁4012👏8😢6👍4🤔3

15 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC≈3,890 views164 reactionsread 16 August 2026

По мнению британской The Guardian, НАТО провалило оборонное планирование Украины Не на поле боя, а раньше - в кабинетах, где годами рассказывали о «долгосрочной поддержке Киева». Выяснилось, что ракет для Patriot нужно в три-четыре раза больше, чем весь мир производит за год. А расширять производство заранее почему-то никто не стал. Как и доводить европейский SAMP/T до состояния полноценной массовой альтернативы.

👍116👏24🔥157🤔1😁1

15 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC≈4,670 views82 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

📼📷📸📹 #БольшаяИгра на Первом с Дмитрием Сусловым. Смотреть это видео в MAX

👍704🔥4👌3😁1

15 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC≈4,740 views67 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

📼📷📸📹 #БольшаяИгра на Первом с Дмитрием Сусловым. Смотреть это видео в MAX

👍61🔥5😁1

15 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC≈4,700 views71 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

📼📷📸📹 #БольшаяИгра на Первом с Дмитрием Сусловым. Смотреть это видео в MAX

👍614😁3🎉1👌1🤔1

14 Aug 2026, 19:07 UTC≈6,590 views146 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Дорогие друзья. Как обычно подводим итоги минувшей рабочей недели, анализируем ключевые геополитические события в новом выпуске АК-81. 🔻Доступно по ссылкам: https://vkvideo.ru/video-52620949_456302195 https://rutube.ru/video/1a97b044ea53cb3eb899f3011ab00894/?r=a/

85👍45🔥6🎉3👌2😱2🤔1😁1

14 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC≈7,210 views284 reactions1 Starread 16 August 2026
Video

📼📷📸📹 Для того чтобы сломить противника, нужно надавить на три центра сопротивления: столицу, армию и союзников. По столице мы работаем, по армии тоже, а союзники - это в первую очередь логистика. Украина без внешней подпитки не в состоянии двигаться дальше, поэтому логистические маршруты имеют ключевое значение. Турция обещает перебросить огромное количество снарядов и ракет морем, поэтому и просят открыть порты. По

👍23323🔥15👏8👌4😁1

14 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC≈6,490 views87 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍7011👏5😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 96 posts we hold for @aklintsevich. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 123,368 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ШЕЙНИН
@GardeZ66 · 254,055
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
Артамонов: Оборона России
@nationaldef · 115,855
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
ДОКТОР СОСНОВСКИЙ
@dr_alex_sosnowski · 114,121
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
Сергей Михеев
@ironlogica · 212,283
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“КЛИНЦЕВИЧ” (@aklintsevich), 53,832 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aklintsevich.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.