8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,532–21,560 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 16:14
21,535
-7
11 Aug 2026, 15:27
21,542
-6
10 Aug 2026, 15:23
21,548
-5
9 Aug 2026, 17:03
21,553
-2
8 Aug 2026, 16:21
21,555
-2
7 Aug 2026, 19:51
21,557
+3
6 Aug 2026, 18:47
21,554
-2
6 Aug 2026, 08:17
21,556
first reading
Engagement
32 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.4%
avg views ÷ 21,535 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,610
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 32 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
32 (23 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
147,510
Reactions total
3,040
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 23:11 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈12,300
Videos
≈1,450
Links
≈3,260
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
20m 51s
Average length
3m 29s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,648 reactions across 26 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
961
36.3%
🤔
768
29.0%
💯
267
10.1%
❤
192
7.25%
😁
165
6.23%
🤡
89
3.36%
🥱
71
2.68%
🔥
56
2.11%
👏
17
0.642%
👎
16
0.604%
🥴
16
0.604%
👌
13
0.491%
🤯
6
0.227%
😢
4
0.151%
🙈
4
0.151%
🐳
1
0.038%
🤣
1
0.038%
🤬
1
0.038%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,040reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
56
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 32 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
51
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @voitenkov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 32 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Банки не хотят давать государству денег. Вот это наглость!
Механизм снабжения государства деньгами через наращивание внутреннего долга выглядит так:
Майнфайн выпускает облигации и проводит еженедельный аукцион. Банки и другие финансовые организации покупают государственные долги.
В июле текущего года Майнфайн отменил все аукционы. Сначала объявил, но потом отменил. Потому что банки не захотели покупать госдолг на …
Наступающие события ставят меня в затруднительное положение. Однообразно начинать каждую заметку с фраз "Как я говорил... как я предсказывал..."
Губернатор Липецкой области написал замечательное послание к гражданам. Скоро такие воодушевляющие обращения будет писать большинство губернаторов всея Руси.
Как было предсказано путём гадания на картах и сложения кастрюлек Таро в квадрат Пифагора - граждане потребляют сли…
Про киноделов. В обществе полыхает прекрасный скандал, связанный с фильмом „Последний богатырь Колобок“.
Название сразу вызывает подозрение в умственном здоровье сценаристов. Жуткая пропитая морда Колобка на постерах сигнализирует, что фильм предназначен для специфической аудитории.
И всё бы прошло как обычно. Очередной провал российского кино. У всех бывает, в Голливуде тоже неудачные фильмы снимают. Поругают, нап…
Скоро российским киноделам придётся идти в продавцы и грузчики. Жизнь становится такой интересной и весёлой, что перешибает профессиональных сценаристов.
Партию Яблоко допустили к выбора в Государственную Думу. Но через неделю возбудили суд и яблочников удалили из допущенных партий.
Юридический механизм регистрации на выборы содержит несколько этапов. На каждом из них партию очень легко забраковать - по имеющимся и…
Когда случается некое событие, люди сразу высказывают различные предположения. Версий бывает много. Поначалу действительно, непонятно, какая теория ближе к реальности. Затем проходит время и причина становится более явственной.
Топливный кризис с огромными очередями на заправках вызвал шквал различных версий. Ещё более удивительным стал факт, что через некоторое время очереди на АЗС почти пропали.
Поначалу я высказ…
Доход в имперской системе управления распределяется согласно уровню. Кто повыше - берёт себе больше. Деньги выделяются на некое дело, и пока идут до конкретных исполнителей - сумма сокращается. Каждый уровень забирает свою долю. Обычно исполнителю что-то достаётся и дело как-то делается.
Уровень выше получает красивый рапорт. Который перекинет ещё выше со своими приписками. И так далее. В итоге император получает ве…
Имперская система управления сверху вниз устроена так:
Император назначает управленцев верхнего уровня. Эти управленцы назначают руководителей среднего уровня. И так далее вниз до самой мелкой должности.
В империи не бывает выборов должностных лиц. Выбор делает начальник, когда решает, кого назначить на нижние посты.
Таким образом формируются группы кланов, обычно родственных. Каждый начальник расставляет своих бл…
Знаете, что является главной скрепой российской системы власти?
Коррупция. Воровство, взяточничество, распил и другие схемы обогащения с использованием служебного положения.
Ну вот, эта надоевшая песенка давно разогнанных оппозиционеров.
На самом деле коррупция - это неотъемлемая система, на которой держится всё государственное управление. Это часть государственного механизма. Неофициальная, но обязательная.
Объя…
Мы довольно часто обсуждали, влияют ли люди на общество, государство и на человечество.
Есть разные точки зрения между двумя крайними позициями:
- Все перемены происходят только сверху. По желанию управленцев, явных или тайных.
- Масса людей сама выбирает и решает.
Сторонники обоих версий приводят различные примеры из истории и современности, подкрепляющие их теорию. Оказывается, что примеры есть для обоих крайни…
Оспаривать решения чиновников, служащих и других действующих лиц отважится не каждый гражданин. Надо писать много жалоб в разные инстанции, судиться. Это долго, муторно, требует затрат времени и денег.
Но есть другой фактор воздействия. Огласка.
Человек выложил фото или видео, и ранее скрываемое становится известно многим. Люди возмущаются, ругаются, призывают к действию. В случае огласки системе приходится как-то …
Ранее мы с вами разобрались, что основной причиной, по которой происходят изменения в обществе - является изменения технологий. Именно технологии меняют взаимодействие людей гораздо сильнее других факторов.
Какая технология сильно развивается в последнее время?
Электронных коммуникаций. Передача и хранение и распространение разного вида информации. Если говорить научным и юридическим языком.
По собственному опыту …
👍66🤔27❤12🤡1🥱1😁1
Signed Артём Войтенков
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @voitenkov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 197,744 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Войтенков МЫСЛИ” (@voitenkov), 21,535 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/voitenkov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
