Канал Сергея Брекотина. Редактор сайта AfterShock.News RuTube: https://rutube.ru/channel/32774478
ВК: https://vk.com/brekotins
По рекламе обращаться @mrs_fedoroval
Предложить инфоповод: @SnezhanaShamsudinova
4878054971
#8AAXB
Created
10 February 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 1,201 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @brekotin_sergey — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Channels linked by matching posts
This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
67 measurements spanning 98 days, net -1,012. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 50,334–51,651 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 67
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 13:00
50,486
-10
9 Nov 2026, 17:34
50,496
-21
8 Nov 2026, 06:59
50,517
-17
6 Nov 2026, 19:40
50,534
-2
5 Nov 2026, 21:24
50,536
-4
4 Nov 2026, 21:07
50,540
-9
3 Nov 2026, 20:16
50,549
-7
2 Nov 2026, 17:57
50,556
-6
1 Nov 2026, 16:18
50,562
-9
31 Oct 2026, 17:04
50,571
-8
30 Oct 2026, 20:28
50,579
-9
29 Oct 2026, 21:21
50,588
-19
28 Oct 2026, 17:49
50,607
-17
27 Oct 2026, 17:50
50,624
-8
26 Oct 2026, 20:35
50,632
-5
25 Oct 2026, 21:45
50,637
-11
24 Oct 2026, 20:00
50,648
-19
23 Oct 2026, 20:49
50,667
-15
22 Oct 2026, 22:59
50,682
-12
21 Oct 2026, 23:41
50,694
first reading
Engagement
1,236 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 198 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.92%
avg views ÷ 50,486 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,490
347 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.20%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
347
of 1,236 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
1,236 (4 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
1,211,720
Reactions total
38,815
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Nov 2026, 00:41 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈21,300
Videos
≈9,380
Links
≈17,500
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
17h 32m
Average length
4m 08s
Measured directly from 255 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
108,781 reactions across 998 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
28,433
26.1%
😁
14,907
13.7%
🤣
10,969
10.1%
🤔
8,809
8.10%
💯
8,748
8.04%
🤡
8,455
7.77%
🤬
6,941
6.38%
🔥
5,794
5.33%
❤
5,335
4.90%
😡
1,913
1.76%
🤮
1,819
1.67%
👏
1,356
1.25%
🤯
1,068
0.982%
🙏
1,033
0.95%
👎
849
0.78%
😱
632
0.581%
👌
602
0.553%
🙈
583
0.536%
😢
228
0.21%
🤨
129
0.119%
3 further kinds
178
0.164%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 998 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 108,781 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 23 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
73
across the posts below
Posts paid on
19
of 999 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @brekotin_sergey. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 23 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
1.40%
14 of 1,000 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
14
posts carrying an erid · 6 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
3,220
over 14 measured posts
Median views · rest
3,340
over 985 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2Vtzqw2TP57
5
14 October 2026
31 October 2026
2Vtzqw1BB6C
4
22 September 2026
28 September 2026
2VtzqxH41vB
2
24 August 2026
30 August 2026
2VtzqvS181z
1
9 September 2026
9 September 2026
2Vtzqwe3Vt7
1
2 September 2026
2 September 2026
CQH36pWzJqUqfuc6dx1v8Jaag6y2PfbRwmythv9LGYqf2P
1
10 October 2026
10 October 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 23 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 347 posts held from the last 30 days (1.15%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Какое будущее может быть у России и Узбекистана в медиасфере?
На III Российско-Узбекском медиафоруме в Ташкенте гендиректор Президентской платформы «Россия – страна возможностей», ректор Мастерской управления «Сенеж» Андрей Бетин отметил, что российская сторона заинтересована в обмене опытом с узбекскими специалистами.
«Потому что сильное медиапространство строится не на конкуренции, а на партнерстве и готовности у…
Усть-Луга | Брекотин
https://rutube.ru/video/98512fe67901daab67a6c7130d14cce3/
Усть-Луге после атаки беспилотников вспыхнул пожар в портовой зоне.По предварительным данным, поражён терминал «Новатэк», сообщается о нескольких очагах возгорания.По сообщениям очевидцев, зарево было видно даже из Эстонии. Под удар могли попасть и танкеры, но подтверждения этому пока нет.
Кроме того, появились сообщения о потерях россий…
Вчера посмотрел «Свинцовые небеса». Сразу честно: кинокритики, думаю, найдут там немало справедливых претензий. Бюджет у фильма был скромный, и это видно. Где-то проседает режиссура, где-то драматургия: нет одного главного героя, несколько историй связаны между собой не всегда ловко. Есть наивность, есть шероховатости.
Но мне фильм зашёл.
Он снят Алисой Курганской, луганчанкой, которая работала в Донбассе, Попасной…
Мерц допустил разговор с Путиным после Абу-Даби, если тот приедет на декабрьский саммит G20 в Майами. Вспоминается - съесть-то он съест, да кто ж ему даст.
Берлин договорился с США, Киевом и европейцами о «принципах» дальнейших переговоров. Но с Россией эти принципы ещё никто не согласовывал.
Москве предлагают сначала закрыть главный вопрос без обсуждения причин конфликта и гарантий безопасности, а затем отдать эти…
Переговоры в Абу-Даби, новая Ялта, выбор Армении, пузырь ИИ
В очередном выпуске моей авторской программы «По сути дела», что выходит на радио «Комсомольская Правда» по вторникам в 20:00, вместе с заместителем редактора отдела политики КП Андреем Зобовым обсудили главные геополитические и военные события недели:
🔴Переговоры в Абу-Даби: изменились ли позиции сторон?
🔴Гарантии безопасности и роль Европы в переговорах;…
У хуситов спрашивают разрешения, Bosch режет людей, японцы теряют Россию| AfterShock.news
https://rutube.ru/video/9f29e79abb015464b35fbe725d4b525e/
Акции JTI рухнули после передачи российских активов во временное управление / Дальний Восток: ипотека для СВОих / Bosch сократит 24 тысячи рабочих мест / Судовладельцы начали просить у хуситов разрешение на проход по Красному морю / Губернатор Калифорнии отменил 548 сме…
Невероятно, но факт: 117 стран в ООН проголосовали за резолюцию России против героизации нацизма. И 53 - против. Среди противников США, Канада, Украина, почти весь Евросоюз, а также понимающие толк в нацизме Германия, Италия и Япония.
Текст осуждает не только свастику и неонацистские марши, но и более знакомые нынешней Европе вещи: снос памятников воинам-антифашистам, обеление коллаборационистов, переименование улиц…
В Барселоне на протесты вышли 400 тысяч человек. Так заявили организаторы. Городская полиция говорит - 55 тысяч. НО даже по минимальной версии это крупнейшая уличная мобилизация. Повод - жильё, зарплаты и цены. Лозунг - «Жить, а не выживать».
Это была первая за 14 лет всеиспанская 24-часовая забастовка. В Каталонии пикеты блокировали около 50 дорог и промзоны, метро работало на четверть мощности, в аэропорту Барсело…
Вовремя остановиться - это искусство. После предложения запретить пиццу общественник Виталий Бородин взялся за новогодние подарки: из детских наборов, по его мнению, надо убрать Snickers, Mars, Twix, Bounty и прочие «иностранные сладости».
Детям следует прививать любовь к российскому шоколаду, а не к западным брендам. Правда, многие из перечисленных батончиков выпускает ООО «Марс» на российских фабриках в Подмосковь…
Канада отказала в визах российским хоккеистам. Не смогут выступать даже те, у кого уже есть действующие канадские визы. Под запрет попадут и официальные лица сборной. Вместе с россиянами не пустят белорусов.
Теперь международная федерация оказалась на шпагате: решение суда исполнить обязана, а провести турнир с допущенной сборной Канада не даёт. По правилам, должны перенести чемпионат.
🇷🇺 Брекотин: MAX | ТГ | RuTub…
В ГД внесен антидроп-законопроект с лимитом 30 тыяч рублей в месяц на переводы и наличные. Если ЦБ увидит у человека риск дропперства, а его банк подтвердит подозрительные операции, включатся два лимита: до 30 тысяч рублей в месяц можно внести наличными и ещё до 30 тысяч - получить переводами от других людей.
Ограничение хотят ввести максимум на год; при повторе в течение трёх лет - на два. Клиента будут обязаны уве…
Зеля приехал в Дублин для встречи с Уиткоффом и Кушнером. Оттуда призвал украинских мужчин мобилизационного возраста возвращаться домой. Мол, «кто-то защищает жизнь и страну, а кто-то нет», и это несправедливо.
Сам пока возвращаться не собирается. В сети уже шутят: в ближайшее время он может посетить Украину с официальным визитом.
Ирландский премьер немедленно на всякий случай уточнил: разыскивать украинцев и отпра…
🤡62🤣21🤮11❤3🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,236 posts we hold for @brekotin_sergey. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@brekotin_sergey edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
12 November 2026
Most recent edit
12 November 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Геоэнергетика ИНФО @geonrgru · 138,997 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
Испания Наизнанку @realspaininsideout · 21,636 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 September 2026
Профессор Игорь Панарин @igor_panarin · 26,117 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 September 2026
Время - вперёд! @vremyavperedrus · 28,393 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 9 September 2026
Позже всех. Новости @politrussiacom · 23,303 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 September 2026
Арбалет Говорит @arbaletgovorit · 40,807 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 29 August 2026
Мир Михаила Онуфриенко @mikle1on · 483,540 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 August 2026
Английский для лентяев @lazy_teaches · 28,180 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 9 September 2026
Николай Дульский. Официальный канал НКО «Формат 45» @DulskiyN · 27,494 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 September 2026
Денис Шалюта, блогер из Сибири @shalyuta · 42,183 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 29 August 2026
Исторический Вольнодумец @istorvoln · 25,204 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 September 2026
Кухня Роджерса @rogers_kitchen · 50,522 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 August 2026
Включай Мозги @chelovek_kotoryi · 53,477 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 August 2026
АНДРЕЙ ВАДЖРА @andreyVajra · 33,016 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026
"Нефтегазовая игра" с Александром Фроловым @OilGasGame · 24,820 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 September 2026
ДРУГАЯ ИСТОРИЯ @DrygaiIstoria · 40,356 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 30 August 2026
ЗАУГЛОМ @ZaUglom2024 · 55,545 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
Сделано в России @madeinrussia_ru · 24,947 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 September 2026
Rogandar NEWs: Новости, факты, события! @Rogandar · 119,388 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
Разгадки истории @razgadki · 20,677 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 September 2026
Kukufffka карикатуры @kukufffka · 21,669 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 22 September 2026
Владимир Горбовский @gorbovskiyfsb · 24,476 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 September 2026
ОСОБОЕ МНЕНИЕ @osob_mnenie · 55,503 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 August 2026
Дмитрий Василец @VasiletsDmitriy · 345,220 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 27 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Брекотин” (@brekotin_sergey), 50,486 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/brekotin_sergey.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.