Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Без комментариев

Channel

Без комментариев

@n0comments

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

45,829subscribers

-147 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001098992160
TypeChannel
Username@n0comments
DescriptionПросто цитаты. Без комментариев. Для связи - @nocomments_admin По вопросам сотрудничества - @JohnSmithNow Регистрация в РКН https://clck.ru/3FTP6V
Created15 February 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held57
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/n0comments

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@n0comments/23083 · this entry13 Aug 2026, 18:47 UTC@vityzeva/15030313 Aug 2026, 18:48 UTC1.002 minutes
@n0comments/23097 · this entry19 Aug 2026, 12:24 UTC@vityzeva/15061219 Aug 2026, 12:27 UTC1.003 minutes
@n0comments/23168 · this entry7 Sept 2026, 08:45 UTC@vityzeva/1516327 Sept 2026, 08:47 UTC1.0072 seconds
@n0comments/23217 · this entry16 Sept 2026, 11:44 UTC@vityzeva/15211516 Sept 2026, 11:45 UTC1.0072 seconds
@n0comments/23390 · this entry27 Oct 2026, 11:40 UTC@vityzeva/15453427 Oct 2026, 11:41 UTC1.00under a minute
@n0comments/23396 · this entry27 Oct 2026, 17:13 UTC@vityzeva/15454827 Oct 2026, 17:14 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@vityzeva6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0072 secondsthis entry (6–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 391 comparable posts for this entry, running 30 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

45,82945,97945,9045 August 2026 — 45,976 subscribers6 August 2026 — 45,976 subscribers7 August 2026 — 45,978 subscribers8 August 2026 — 45,979 subscribers9 August 2026 — 45,978 subscribers10 August 2026 — 45,977 subscribers12 August 2026 — 45,974 subscribers13 August 2026 — 45,977 subscribers14 August 2026 — 45,978 subscribers17 August 2026 — 45,971 subscribers18 August 2026 — 45,966 subscribers19 August 2026 — 45,968 subscribers20 August 2026 — 45,962 subscribers21 August 2026 — 45,970 subscribers22 August 2026 — 45,971 subscribers24 August 2026 — 45,973 subscribers25 August 2026 — 45,969 subscribers26 August 2026 — 45,967 subscribers27 August 2026 — 45,963 subscribers29 August 2026 — 45,964 subscribers31 August 2026 — 45,965 subscribers1 September 2026 — 45,962 subscribers2 September 2026 — 45,956 subscribers3 September 2026 — 45,959 subscribers4 September 2026 — 45,958 subscribers7 September 2026 — 45,962 subscribers10 September 2026 — 45,958 subscribers12 September 2026 — 45,947 subscribers14 September 2026 — 45,944 subscribers15 September 2026 — 45,938 subscribers17 September 2026 — 45,940 subscribers28 September 2026 — 45,917 subscribers5 October 2026 — 45,911 subscribers9 October 2026 — 45,903 subscribers13 October 2026 — 45,889 subscribers14 October 2026 — 45,886 subscribers15 October 2026 — 45,882 subscribers16 October 2026 — 45,883 subscribers18 October 2026 — 45,882 subscribers20 October 2026 — 45,879 subscribers22 October 2026 — 45,877 subscribers23 October 2026 — 45,870 subscribers24 October 2026 — 45,871 subscribers25 October 2026 — 45,873 subscribers26 October 2026 — 45,869 subscribers27 October 2026 — 45,865 subscribers28 October 2026 — 45,863 subscribers29 October 2026 — 45,857 subscribers30 October 2026 — 45,854 subscribers1 November 2026 — 45,848 subscribers2 November 2026 — 45,849 subscribers4 November 2026 — 45,845 subscribers5 November 2026 — 45,841 subscribers6 November 2026 — 45,835 subscribers7 November 2026 — 45,840 subscribers8 November 2026 — 45,834 subscribers9 November 2026 — 45,829 subscribers5 August 20269 November 2026
57 measurements spanning 96 days, net -147. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 45,807–46,002 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 20:5045,829-5
8 Nov 2026, 10:3745,834-6
7 Nov 2026, 08:2145,840+5
6 Nov 2026, 05:4845,835-6
5 Nov 2026, 02:4645,841-4
4 Nov 2026, 00:3945,845-4
2 Nov 2026, 21:1745,849+1
1 Nov 2026, 21:2245,848-6
30 Oct 2026, 17:5645,854-3
29 Oct 2026, 14:3945,857-6
28 Oct 2026, 10:3145,863-2
27 Oct 2026, 09:2545,865-4
26 Oct 2026, 05:5745,869-4
25 Oct 2026, 08:1645,873+2
24 Oct 2026, 07:4945,871+1
23 Oct 2026, 06:0945,870-7
22 Oct 2026, 03:1145,877-2
20 Oct 2026, 19:3045,879-3
18 Oct 2026, 15:5545,882-1
16 Oct 2026, 18:3045,883first reading

Engagement

411 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 193 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.1%
avg views ÷ 45,829 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,500
126 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
126
of 411 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held411 (30 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total1,447,280
Reactions total36,465
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 15:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
17
Videos
2
Links
214

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

117,122 reactions across 407 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣26,06022.3%
👍21,85918.7%
😁14,04312.0%
🙊9,0337.71%
❤7,8176.67%
💯5,6814.85%
👏4,8994.18%
🔥4,4573.81%
🤯3,9803.40%
🤔3,6183.09%
🕊2,5612.19%
😎2,2831.95%
🙏1,7701.51%
👌1,5081.29%
🎉1,3041.11%
😱1,2841.10%
👎1,2461.06%
🤩1,2271.05%
😢1,2021.03%
🥰1,0470.894%
1 further kind2430.207%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 411 of the 411 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118,352 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 411 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 126 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 14:22 UTC≈2,440 views69 reactionsread 11 November 2026

"Мне кажется, да, но сейчас очень многое зависит от всех участников процесса. Многое зависит от Украины, от позиции Соединённых Штатов. Ну и от того, обретёт ли разум Европа. В любом случае все те задачи, которые мы ставили, будут достигнуты". Владимир Мединский о приближении России и Украины к миру

👍38👏18😢9👎2🤬2

11 Nov 2026, 12:25 UTC≈5,310 views262 reactionsread 11 November 2026

"По итогам переговоров в Абу-Даби есть основа для дальнейшей работы. Переговорный процесс в столице ОАЭ не завершился безрезультатно — напротив, стороны заложили базу для последующих шагов". Сергей Рябков, замглавы МИД России

🕊164😎48😁42👎3🤔2🤣2🤬1

11 Nov 2026, 11:44 UTC≈5,780 views249 reactionsread 11 November 2026

"Конфликт на Украине показал, что система безопасности в Европе, сложившаяся после Ялты, работает очень плохо. По сути, болен весь организм, а на Украине просто прорвался нарыв. Поэтому лечить нужно весь организм. Пластырем тут не обойдёшься. Именно этот вопрос был центральным на переговорах. Мы с американской стороной обменялись позициями. По одним вопросам нашли взаимопонимание, по другим пока сохраняются разногла…

👍139🙊61😱43💯3👎2🤣1

11 Nov 2026, 11:44 UTC≈5,440 views295 reactionsread 11 November 2026

"Я думаю, как только у них проснётся совесть, они смогут стать участниками мирных переговоров. До этого момента они, как я сказал, являются участниками группового обмана украинского народа и фактически соучастниками гибели мирного населения". Владимир Мединский о том, когда европейцы смогут сесть за стол переговоров

❤183🙊57🤔52👎2🤣1

11 Nov 2026, 11:44 UTC≈5,750 views292 reactionsread 11 November 2026

"Завтра мы со Стивом отправимся в Москву на встречу с президентом Путиным. Мы обсудим с ним итоги сегодняшних переговоров и постараемся продвинуться по ряду вопросов, поскольку видим возможности для этого. Затем мы вылетим в Дублин, где встретимся с президентом Зеленским". Джаред Кушнер об итогах переговоров России и Украины

😁175🎉62👍52👎1🤣1🤬1

11 Nov 2026, 10:51 UTC≈6,860 views231 reactionsread 11 November 2026

"Наша главная задача — сократить доступность вейпов, особенно для молодежи. Несмотря на то что Петербург одним из первых регионов ввел запрет на продажу вейпов несовершеннолетним, их интерес к опасной продукции продолжает расти. Наличие этих систем в открытой продаже все равно оставляет некоторые лазейки для его нарушения". Александр Бельский, спикер парламента Санкт-Петербурга

🙊131😁50🤯41👎3🔥2👍1🕊1🤣1

10 Nov 2026, 12:47 UTC≈10,700 views273 reactionsread 11 November 2026

"Но что касается участия европейцев, полетели они в Абу-Даби, пусть там в гостинице посидят. Американцы сказали, что до переговоров с нашей делегацией они проведут встречи с украинцами и с европейцами, видимо, чтобы зарядиться их бодрым духом, нацеленностью на устойчивый мир. Я не думаю, что это перспективная форма работы. Но мы не можем и не хотим препятствовать американцам общаться с теми, с кем они считают нужным…

❤166🤣57👍44👎4🤔1🤬1

10 Nov 2026, 08:55 UTC≈12,000 views258 reactionsread 11 November 2026

"Мы надеемся, что сегодняшняя встреча в представительном составе, наша коллегиация стала больше и еще более профессиональной, позволит нам продвинуться на пути к новому. В интересах народа России и народа Украины". Владимир Мединский о старте переговоров с Украиной

🤣153👍58🤯40❤3😁2👎1🤬1

10 Nov 2026, 08:03 UTC≈12,400 views293 reactionsread 11 November 2026

"В этом главное отличие нынешней администрации от администрации Байдена, которая, как я сказал, высокомерно отказывалась даже обсуждать коллективные гарантии безопасности. И там диалога не было никакого. А администрации Трампа мы иллюзии не питаем, я хочу это сразу сказать. Но не питая иллюзий, понимаем глубинные противоречия в отношении того, как дальше должна развиваться международная политика, Конечно, всегда лучш…

🔥175🤣60🎉53🤯2👎1💯1🤬1

10 Nov 2026, 08:03 UTC≈10,300 views248 reactionsread 11 November 2026

"Начинаются переговоры в Абу-Даби , где по предложению американской стороны, согласованному с нами, будут обсуждаться вопросы обеспечения коллективной безопасности в этом регионе под гарантией, которые вступят в силу после достижения полноценного всеобъемлющего урегулирования". Сергей Лавров

👍144🤣52🤔51👎1

9 Nov 2026, 14:00 UTC≈12,000 views248 reactionsread 11 November 2026

"Архитектура безопасности в Европе разрушена и восстановлению не подлежит. Без учёта интересов России и наших союзников прийти к формуле долгосрочной стабильности на этой территории не получится. Странам-членам НАТО и Евросоюза и их единомышленникам следует прекратить нагнетать напряжённость. Оценить реальные риски безудержной милитаризации и задействовать все возможные механизмы для предотвращения развития событий п…

❤125🤣65👍48👎3😱3💯2🤩1🤬1

9 Nov 2026, 13:56 UTC≈11,500 views283 reactionsread 11 November 2026

"По сути Украина в конфликте является лишь пешкой Запада, уже многие годы находящейся на его содержании. Впрочем, за миллиарды, полученные Киевской верхушкой, расплачиваются простые украинцы ресурсами, землями, благополучием, жизнями. Страны НАТО и Евросоюза плотно вовлечены в вооружённый конфликт на Украине. Фактически управляют им и несут за это ответственность. Именно так мы расцениваем действия тех, кто поставляе…

😁157👍64🙊54💯4👎3🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 411 posts we hold for @n0comments. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Жизнь насекомых
@insect_life · 192,654
#1
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,975,436
#2
Номенклатура
@nomenclatura · 58,021
#3
Анатолий Шарий
@asupersharij · 1,735,796
#4
Милитарист
@infantmilitario · 275,861
#5
МИГ России
@mig41 · 476,724
#6
Коммерсантъ
@kommersant · 295,286
#7
Старше Эдды
@vysokygovorit · 485,001
#8
Резидент
@rezident_ua · 956,216
#9
Образ будущего
@obrazbuduschego2 · 163,839
#10
Димитриев
@russ_orientalist · 129,177
#11
Kotsnews
@sashakots · 469,475
#12
Легитимный
@legitimniy · 1,041,883
#13
RIA_Kremlinpool
@RIAKremlinpool · 68,496
#14
Дмитрий Медведев
@medvedev_telegram · 1,688,832
#15
Медиатехнолог
@mediatech · 102,516
#16
На Zzzzzападном фронте без перемен
@ve4niyvoy · 112,484
#17
ИА "Стекломой"
@ia_steklomoy · 108,641
#18
Агентство. Новости
@agentstvonews · 103,748
#19
КСТАТИ
@kstati_p · 235,111
#20
ЧТД
@chtddd · 454,999
#21
Можем объяснить
@mozhemobyasnit · 460,863
#22
Железный занавес
@i_curtain · 61,997
#23
WarGonzo
@wargonzo · 738,065
#24
Новая газета
@novaya_pishet · 211,151
#25
Baza
@bazabazon · 1,557,057
#26
ЕЖ
@ejdailyru · 664,380
#27
Mash
@mash · 3,140,033
#28
Минправды
@minpravda · 62,284
#29
Пул N3
@dimsmirnov175 · 330,919
#30
Андрей Vышинский
@a_vyshinskiy · 58,959
#31
Банкста
@banksta · 439,838
#32
Медуза — LIVE
@meduzalive · 1,116,844
#33
КАШИН
@kashinguru · 75,059
#34
Кровавая барыня
@bloodysx · 1,172,884
#35
aavst2022
@aavst2022 · 175,172
#36
Readovka
@readovkanews · 2,012,342
#37
НЕЗЫГАРЬ
@russicaru · 417,710
#38
Осторожно, новости
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,621,101
#39
РБК. Новости. Главное
@rbc_news · 913,555
#40
Colonelcassad
@boris_rozhin · 750,635
#41
Лентач
@lentachold · 391,588
#42
SHOT
@shot_shot · 1,265,529
#43
КОНТЕКСТ
@kontext_channel · 865,039
#44
Сталингулаг
@stalin_gulag · 297,807
#45
SVTV NEWS — Либертарианское СМИ
@svtvnews · 112,375
#46
ТАСС
@tass_agency · 569,137
#47
Караульный Z
@karaulny · 119,939
#48
BBC News | Русская служба
@bbcrussian · 388,911
#49
БП онлайн
@bponline · 111,510
#50
Минута в минуту
@minutavminutu · 167,164
#51
Хайлайт | Новости
@h1ghl1ghts · 68,777
#52
Fighterbomber
@bomber_fighter · 525,130
#53
Артемий Лебедев
@temalebedev · 968,108
#54
Дабл Ять
@otsuka_bld · 158,837
#55
ASTRA
@astrapress · 350,188
#56
Д///ИХАД
@tvjihad · 123,159
#57
Мышь в овощном
@kbrvdvkr · 79,547
#58
Лука Ебков
@luka_ebkov · 429,055
#59
Подъём
@pdmnews · 206,677
#60
Дудь
@yurydud · 849,220
#61
BRIEFLY RU
@brieflyru · 100,290
#62
Логика Маркова
@logikamarkova · 52,754
#63
The Bell
@thebell_io · 105,097
#64
PLUSHEV/ПЛЮЩЕВ
@PlushevChannel · 97,956
#65
Беспощадный пиарщик
@prbezposhady · 151,213
#66
Антиглянец
@sncmag · 299,576
#67
Сергей Минаев
@minaevlife · 317,691
#68
Tynu40k Goblina (oper.ru)
@oper_goblin · 490,249
#69
Толкователь
@tolk_tolk · 126,403
#70
Фонтанка SPB Online
@fontankaspb · 408,634
#71
Лентач
@oldlentach · 262,523
#72
Московские новости
@mnews_ru · 194,474
#73
На видео видно
@navideovidno · 108,804
#74
ТеZис
@tethis · 42,163
#75
Пездуза
@pezduzalive · 368,836
#76
Не туда
@netudasmm · 41,468
#77
Коза кричала
@kozakrichala · 181,638
#78
НЕБОЖЕНА
@imnotbozhena · 503,492
#79
ИА Панорама
@ia_panorama · 76,084
#80
Минобороны России
@mod_russia · 649,746
#81
историк-алкоголик
@istrkalkglk · 123,361
#82
Медиазона
@mediazzzona · 164,621
#83
MarketTwits
@markettwits · 341,015
#84
Военный Осведомитель
@milinfolive · 614,488
#85
Маргарита Симоньян
@margaritasimonyan · 505,466
#86
Выборка
@vyborka · 39,976
#87
Kadyrov_95
@rkadyrov_95 · 2,026,626
#88
Екатерина Шульман
@eschulmann · 299,577
#89
Двач
@dvachannel · 969,331
#90
Политджойстик / Politjoystic ™
@politjoystic · 250,548
#91
Теперь живите с этим
@viveconesto · 53,314
#92
112
@ENews112 · 363,135
#93
Архитектурные излишества
@arkhlikbez · 123,467
#94

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 27 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Номенклатура
@nomenclatura · 58,021
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 23 August 2026
ТеZис
@tethis · 42,163
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 August 2026
Железный занавес
@i_curtain · 61,997
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 August 2026
Фестивальный
@festivalny · 24,148
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 September 2026
Страна возможностей
@strana_vozmozhnostei · 24,320
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 September 2026
Повестка
@povestka_ru · 26,645
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 September 2026
Минправды
@minpravda · 62,284
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 22 August 2026
ПроПром
@ruproprom · 39,550
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
ЮЖНЫЙ КРАЙ | ДОНБАСС, НОВОРОССИЯ
@uzh_kraj · 50,626
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 August 2026
Регионал
@regionalny · 28,797
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 9 September 2026
Архипелаг БИГТЕХ
@arhbigtech · 23,954
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
Выборка
@vyborka · 39,976
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 31 August 2026
Андрей Vышинский
@a_vyshinskiy · 58,959
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 August 2026
Хайлайт | Новости
@h1ghl1ghts · 68,777
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 August 2026
Суеверная Демократия
@sueverdem · 51,481
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 25 August 2026
ЕБИТДА
@ebitdaebitda · 33,668
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 4 September 2026
Рука рынка
@market_hand · 30,591
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 7 September 2026
Мышь в овощном
@kbrvdvkr · 79,547
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
Генерал-губернатор
@general_governor · 27,457
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 11 September 2026
Рыбная полка
@rybhoz_channel · 26,270
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
Кот Эльвиры
@KotElviry · 47,884
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 26 August 2026
Ресайкл
@recyclemagru · 58,109
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
Профессия – педиатр
@profpediatrician · 19,650
Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 1 October 2026
Профессия – эндокринолог
@profendocrinologist · 21,276
Telegram ranks this channel #97 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 September 2026

This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Без комментариев” (@n0comments), 45,829 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/n0comments.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.