Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for БАБАКОВ

Channel

БАБАКОВ

@ambabakov

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

16,007subscribers

+152 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003448266766
TypeChannel
Username@ambabakov
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held36
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ambabakov

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

11,600 average views per post against 16,007 subscribers — an engagement rate of 72.7%. Across the 12,673 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,016–31,622 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.36% and 17.3%, with a median of 8.65%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (27 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Posts measured12 of 12 published in the window (0 exact, 12 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled139,660
Mature posts only61.9% over 9 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers16,007 measured 26 September 2026
Cohortb10000:rus · 12,673 channels · p10 2.23% · p25 4.36% · p50 8.65% · p75 17.3% · p90 30.1%
Position in cohort99.164th percentile · 8.4× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.183% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 26 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

15,66716,10115,8846 August 2026 — 15,855 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,855 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,847 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,923 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,951 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,941 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,915 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,916 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,018 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,101 subscribers15 August 2026 — 16,078 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,056 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,042 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,003 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,976 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,971 subscribers22 August 2026 — 15,944 subscribers23 August 2026 — 15,899 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,953 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,936 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,925 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,895 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,851 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,924 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,911 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,897 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,876 subscribers3 September 2026 — 15,859 subscribers5 September 2026 — 15,827 subscribers9 September 2026 — 15,902 subscribers11 September 2026 — 15,889 subscribers13 September 2026 — 15,856 subscribers15 September 2026 — 15,745 subscribers17 September 2026 — 15,717 subscribers19 September 2026 — 15,667 subscribers26 September 2026 — 16,007 subscribers16,0076 August 202626 September 2026
36 measurements spanning 52 days, net +152. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,602–16,166 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 15:4016,007+340
19 Sept 2026, 15:2115,667-50
17 Sept 2026, 03:2115,717-28
15 Sept 2026, 02:4015,745-111
13 Sept 2026, 12:4015,856-33
11 Sept 2026, 15:5715,889-13
9 Sept 2026, 02:2115,902+75
5 Sept 2026, 20:1615,827-32
3 Sept 2026, 17:5515,859-17
2 Sept 2026, 12:3415,876-21
1 Sept 2026, 10:3515,897-14
31 Aug 2026, 07:0715,911-13
30 Aug 2026, 04:4715,924+73
29 Aug 2026, 07:3715,851-44
28 Aug 2026, 07:2615,895-30
27 Aug 2026, 03:5215,925-11
26 Aug 2026, 03:0515,936-17
25 Aug 2026, 00:1615,953+54
23 Aug 2026, 12:1515,899-45
22 Aug 2026, 01:5715,944first reading

Engagement

63 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
72.7%
avg views ÷ 16,007 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,600
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.092%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 63 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held63 (30 July 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total139,660
Reactions total128
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3h 34m
Average length
4m 23s

Measured directly from 49 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

710 reactions across 59 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍50971.7%
🔥9513.4%
❤476.62%
👏283.94%
💯202.82%
🤩60.845%
👎20.282%
🙏20.282%
😁10.141%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 63 of the 63 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 748 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 63 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 08:55 UTC≈1,300 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

В «Полном контакте» отдельно остановились на китайском опыте. 🔴Я не считаю, что нам нужно просто копировать Китай. Но мы обязаны внимательно изучать то, что даёт результат. Нам нужно понимать, какой мы хотим видеть Россию через 10–15 лет. Китай сумел выстроить систему, в которой денежно-кредитная политика работает вместе с задачами государства. Деньги становятся не самоцелью и не дорогим товаром, а инструментом раз…

👍1

2 Sept 2026, 13:30 UTC≈2,350 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

О российской экономике и ее устойчивости В эфире «Большой игры» говорили о том, как сегодня чувствует себя российская экономика и насколько оправдано утверждение о ее переходе на «военные рельсы». 🔴Я бы здесь внес важное уточнение: у нас действительно есть военная и гражданская составляющие экономики, но они не существуют изолированно друг от друга. Напротив, сегодня они тесно связаны. Успехи ВПК невозможны без раб…

👍7

2 Sept 2026, 11:25 UTC≈46,800 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

В продолжение разговора с Владимиром Соловьёвым о государственном долге я хотел бы обратить внимание на простую вещь. Нужно смотреть не только на то, сколько государство должно, но и на то, кому и за что мы платим. 🔴Наш государственный долг относительно размера российской экономики небольшой. Более того, значительная часть этих средств связана с государственными инвестициями — инфраструктурой, промышленностью, разви…

👏5👍4💯1

2 Sept 2026, 09:15 UTC≈2,350 views11 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

В завершение выступления в программе «Воскресный вечер с Владимиром Соловьёвым» подчеркнул: формирование новой экономической модели невозможно без системного подхода и долгосрочного планирования. Новой экономической модели нужны системность, планирование и государственные инвестиции. Государственные расходы на развитие нельзя постоянно воспринимать исключительно как затраты бюджета. Во многих случаях это именно инве…

👍9🔥2

1 Sept 2026, 11:15 UTC≈2,470 views13 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Сегодня в «Полном контакте» с Владимиром Соловьёвым говорили об участии России в работе G20. Россия должна использовать возможности, которые открываются в международном диалоге. 🔴Считаю, что сам факт присутствия нашего министра финансов на заседании министров финансов и представителей центральных банков — серьёзный шаг вперёд. Несмотря на все попытки изолировать Россию, с нами вынуждены считаться. Но важно, чтобы т…

👍8💯4🤩1

1 Sept 2026, 09:20 UTC≈6,750 views13 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Высокая ставка фактически разделила экономику на два контура. Продолжая разговор в эфире «Воскресного вечера с Владимиром Соловьёвым», обратил внимание на важную особенность нынешней экономической ситуации. Сегодня российская экономика действительно во многом стала двухконтурной. Но причина не в том, что ресурсы якобы перетекают из гражданского сектора в военно-промышленный комплекс. Причина в другом. 🔴ВПК и связан…

👏8👍4🤩1

31 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC≈46,400 views12 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Главный критерий экономической политики — насколько она приближает нашу Победу. В эфире программы «Воскресный вечер с Владимиром Соловьёвым» вновь начал с главного: сегодня нет задачи важнее Победы — не только в специальной военной операции, но и над теми силами, которые по-прежнему рассчитывают нанести России поражение. 🔴Если Победа является нашей целью, значит, именно она должна стать критерием оценки работы кажд…

🔥4👍3💯2❤1👎1🤩1

29 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC≈3,970 views15 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Сильная экономика — основа суверенитета. Вторая важная тема нашего разговора с Владимиром Соловьёвым — развитие российской экономики. Мы часто разделяем экономику, безопасность, развитие регионов и поддержку СВО. Но на самом деле это связанные задачи. Ресурсы для ответа на внешнее давление прежде всего создаёт экономика. 🔴Нам нужно расширять производство, развивать инфраструктуру, создавать рабочие места и давать п…

👍11🔥2🤩2

29 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC≈3,950 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Отдельно в эфире Дмитрия Саймса мы обсудили устойчивость российской экономики и отношения с Китаем и Индией. 🔴Торговля — лишь часть наших отношений с этими странами, поэтому внешнее давление не способно кардинально изменить их. При этом российская экономика уже показывает, что способна развиваться даже в условиях масштабных ограничений. Доходы от экспорта сегодня составляют менее 20%, при этом сохраняется профицит …

👍3💯2👏1🤩1

28 Aug 2026, 15:55 UTC≈9,950 views17 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🔴Безопасность — дело общее Указ Президента России № 604 о защите критической инфраструктуры вводит механизм временного управления объектами ТЭК, промышленности, связи, ЖКХ, транспорта и логистики в тех случаях, когда собственник не обеспечивает их безопасность, не выполняет необходимые меры защиты или не может своевременно восстановить работу после повреждения. С точки зрения бизнеса и предпринимателей Президент РС…

👍9🔥6👎1👏1

28 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTC≈4,230 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Защиту страны нельзя превращать в коммерческий проект. Продолжая разговор о новых задачах для предприятий, в «Полном контакте» отдельно остановился на финансовой стороне вопроса. 🔴Если бизнес должен обеспечивать защиту стратегических объектов, у него должны быть ресурсы для этого. Нельзя одновременно требовать от предприятия выполнять государственную задачу и предлагать ему решать её только за счёт дорогих коммерче…

👍10

28 Aug 2026, 10:58 UTC≈9,140 views12 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

В разговоре на «Большой игре» я обратил внимание на проблему, которая выходит далеко за рамки конкретного конфликта. 🔴Когда однажды применённое оружие перестаёт восприниматься как нечто действительно опасное, постепенно снижается и психологический барьер перед его дальнейшим использованием. То, что ещё вчера казалось недопустимым, начинают воспринимать как допустимый и даже привычный инструмент. Мы уже видели подоб…

👍12

Showing the 12 most recent of 63 posts we hold for @ambabakov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 29 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“БАБАКОВ” (@ambabakov), 16,007 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ambabakov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.