تحلیل بنیادی کاربردی و تحلیل صندوق ها
اینجا نگاهی بنیادی به بورس داریم؛ تحلیلی آرام، دقیق و بیحاشیه که بدون اغراق، واقعیتهای بازار را نشان میدهد
اراتمند شما: آرش مهراز
Created
6 July 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
No sample pairs were kept for this entry. The counts below were measured, but without the pairs there is nothing here for you to open and check, so treat the relationship as recorded rather than demonstrated.
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 5 of the 5 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 271 comparable posts for this entry, running 27 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
64 measurements spanning 96 days, net -701. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,555–25,466 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 06:51
24,660
-10
8 Nov 2026, 16:06
24,670
+2
7 Nov 2026, 11:01
24,668
-13
6 Nov 2026, 11:55
24,681
-12
5 Nov 2026, 10:58
24,693
-1
4 Nov 2026, 14:06
24,694
-13
3 Nov 2026, 11:48
24,707
-4
2 Nov 2026, 08:36
24,711
-7
1 Nov 2026, 08:56
24,718
-17
31 Oct 2026, 10:10
24,735
-10
30 Oct 2026, 07:28
24,745
-5
29 Oct 2026, 06:08
24,750
-8
28 Oct 2026, 04:28
24,758
-13
27 Oct 2026, 04:29
24,771
-18
26 Oct 2026, 06:21
24,789
-13
25 Oct 2026, 03:35
24,802
-18
24 Oct 2026, 00:04
24,820
-10
22 Oct 2026, 21:45
24,830
-8
21 Oct 2026, 15:59
24,838
-16
20 Oct 2026, 11:28
24,854
first reading
Engagement
276 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 172 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.9%
avg views ÷ 24,660 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,670
115 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.187%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
115
of 276 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 111 of 115 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
276 (27 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
421,670
Reactions total
766
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 20:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,860
Videos
≈82
Links
≈1,740
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 17s
Average length
46s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,692 reactions across 267 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,036
38.5%
❤
881
32.7%
👏
274
10.2%
👎
182
6.76%
😢
90
3.34%
😍
89
3.31%
🤯
53
1.97%
😡
32
1.19%
🔥
24
0.892%
💔
17
0.632%
😱
14
0.52%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 269 of the 276 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,692 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 276 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 115 posts held from the last 30 days (2.61%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
👍۶۱.۰۹ همت دارایی تحت مدیریت؛ نگاهی به تأمین سرمایه دماوند
💜با توجه به جذابیت تأمین سرمایهها از منظر رشد درآمد، تنوع فعالیت و پایداری سودآوری، به بررسی عملکرد این شرکتها در دورههای مختلف پرداختیم (سودآوری دلاری صنعت در تصویر مشخص شده است)
💜در این میان، تأمین سرمایه دماوند (تماوند) با رشد سود دلای بیش از میانگین صنعت، و با عبور داراییهای تحت مدیریت از ۶۱.۰۹ همت و برخورداری از مجموعهای متنوع از صندوقهای سرمایه…
🔵دلار در پنج سال ۱۰.۸ برابر شد؛ اما هر سال برنده نبود
⬛️دلار آزاد از ۲۴,۷۵۶ تومان در ابتدای ۱۴۰۰ به ۲۶۶,۸۰۰ تومان رسیده است. این یعنی رشد مرکب حدود ۵۳٪ در سال.
⬛️رشد دلار در هر سال، در برابر میانگین نرخ بدون ریسک همان سال:
🔘در ۱۴۰۰: +۶٪ در برابر ۲۳٪ (سود بدون ریسک جلو بود)
🔘در ۱۴۰۱: +۸۳٪ در برابر ۲۴٪
🔘در ۱۴۰۲: +۲۶٪ در برابر ۲۷٪ (تقریباً برابر)
🔘در ۱۴۰۳: +۶۳٪ در برابر ۳۲٪
🔘در ۱۴۰۴: +۵۶٪ در برابر ۳۶٪
🔘در ۱۴۰۵ ت…
🎙بررسی عملکرد گروه قطعهسازی
⬅️ 00:28 بررسی مقدار تولید شرکتها
⬅️ 00:48 بررسی شرکتها از منظر حاشیه سود ناخالص
⬅️ 01:23 بررسی شرکتها از منظر حاشیه سود خالص
⬅️ 01:30 بررسی سود خالص ۸ نماد بورسی
⬅️ 02:18 رتبهبندی شرکتها از نظر حاشیه سود و تولید
⬅️ 02:58 نکات نهایی
🟦 پدرام روتیها؛ مدیر سرمایهگذاری صندوق بخشی بهینرو
📊 vistaamc
⚪️اهـرمیها در آستانه یک جهش؛ کدام صندوق جذابتر است؟
🤩صندوقهای اهرمی با کاهش حباب منفی به محدوده تکرقمی، بار دیگر در کانون توجه بازار قرار گرفتهاند و میتوانند در صورت تداوم روند صعودی، از ظرفیت رشد قابلتوجهی برخوردار باشند.
🤩به همین بهانه، به بررسی و مقایسه عملکرد صندوقهای اهرمی پرداختیم.
🤩در میان این صندوقها، جهش در بازههای زمانی مختلف بازدهی بالاتری نسبت به میانگین صندوقهای اهرمی ثبت کرده است. بازدهی ی…
🔝صندوق با درآمد ثابت «روند»
سود بالا و روبه رشد با پرداخت ماهانه، تجربهای متمایز از رشد دارایی را رقم میزند.
صندوق با درآمد ثابت "روند پایدار آبان "با ۳۸٫۵٪ بازدهی مؤثر سالانه،گزینهای مناسب برای شماست.
✅چرا صندوق روند پایدار آبان؟
🔵 پرداخت سود ماهانه و منظم
🔵 محاسبه سود بهصورت روزشمار و بدون نرخ شکست
🔵بدون ریسک
⬇️ صدور و ابطال آسان با دانلود اپلیکیشن «لیما» از کافهبازار و مایکت
🔵گروه آبان | @abanfinancial…
🔹از صدرنشینی در بازدهی تا وعده سود بیش از ۴۰ درصد
⚪️در بررسی صندوقهای درآمد ثابت، صندوق ارکیده از چند جهت مورد توجه قرار گرفت. این صندوق طی یک سال گذشته عملکردی بهمراتب بهتر از میانگین صندوقهای درآمد ثابت داشته و در سال ۱۴۰۴ نیز موفق به کسب رتبه نخست از نظر بازدهی شده است.
⚪️اما نکته جذابتر، سود اعلامی بیش از ۴۰ درصد برای بازدهی یکساله پیشرو است که در کنار عملکرد موفق گذشته، صندوق را به یکی از گزینههای قابل…
🔴داشتن بخشی از سرمایه در صندوقهای درآمد ثابت، فقط برای گرفتن سود ثابت نیست؛ کارکرد مهمترش این است که در بحرانها و اصلاحهای بازار، پول نقد یا کمریسک در دسترس داشته باشیم تا بتوانیم در قیمتهای مناسب اقدام به خرید کنیم. به همین دلیل، نگهداشتن بخشی از دارایی در این نوع صندوقها یک انتخاب احتیاطی و فرصتمحور است.
🔘در میان صندوقهای درآمد ثابت بازار، کیان و یاقوت از گزینههای شناختهشده و جزو خوبها محسوب میشوند. …
🥈نوبت درخشش نقره رسیده ؟
🤩از ابتدای سال تاکنون، اونس طلا حدود ۱۳ درصد و اونس نقره نزدیک به ۲۷ درصد افت کرده. این در حالی است که در بلندمدت، روند حرکتی این دو فلز معمولا همبستگی بالایی دارد.
🤩با کاهش ریسکهای ژئوپلیتیک، بهبود دادههای اقتصادی آمریکا و رونق فعالیت صنایع جهانی، نقره به دلیل کاربردهای گسترده صنعتی میتواند علاوه بر تقاضای سرمایهگذاری، از بهبود شرایط تولید نیز منتفع شود و ظرفیت رشد بیشتری نسبت به طلا د…
🔹رشد قیمتها در زنجیره ماکیان
🤩همانطور که در پستهای قبل مورد اشاره قرار گرفت، افزایش در بهای تمام شده تولید مرغ و تخم مرغ در سال 1405 به صورت مستقیم بر قیمت فروش این محصولات تاثیرگذار است.
🤩مداخله دولت با عنوان تنظیمگری به صورت مقطعی میتواند قیمتها را تحت فشار قرار دهد، اما در تعیین مسیر کلی تاثیر چندانی نخواهد داشت.
🤩قیمت مرغ و تخم مرغ که در شهریور و مهر به دلیل فشار در سمت عرضه با کاهش مواجه شده بودند، مجدد …
🔴افزایش تقاضا در صندوق های اهرمی
🔴با افزایش اقبال به بازار سهام بدلیل کاهش تنش های سیاسی، صندوقهای اهرمی نیز بهدلیل برخورداری از دامنه نوسان بالاتر و امکان کسب بازدهی بیشتر، مورد توجه سرمایهگذاران قرار گرفتهاند.
🔴بررسی بازدهی در بازههای زمانی مختلف نشان میدهد عملکرد صندوق جهش در اغلب دورهها بالاتر از میانگین صندوقهای اهرمی بوده است.
🔴از طرف دیگر اکنون جهش با کمترین حباب معاملاتی نسبت به صندوق های اهرمی معا…
🟢رکورد تومانی زده شد، اما رکورد دلاری هنوز نه
🔴میانگین ارزش معاملات روزانه در ۱۴۰۵: ۱۹.۸ همت (در ۱۴۰۴: ۵.۸ همت)
🔴همین رقم به دلار: ۹۴ میلیون دلار در روز، کمتر از ۱۱۳ میلیون دلار سال ۱۴۰۰
🔴رکورد تومانی: ۴۱ همت در ۱۹ مهر ۱۴۰۵، معادل حدود ۱۵۵ میلیون دلار
🔴رکورد دلاری: ۳۹۲ میلیون دلار در ۷ شهریور ۱۴۰۰
🔴بخش بزرگی از جهش ارزش معاملات، اثر کاهش ارزش ریال است.
آرش مهراز ✅
@InvestmentMind
⚪️خروج تایر از قیمتگذاری دستوری
🤩انتشار خبر خروج قیمت تایر و روغن موتور از شمولیت قیمتگذاری دستوری تا پایان سال موج تقاضا را برای نمادهای صنعت لاستیک و روانکار به همراه داشته است. این تصمیم میتواند زمینهساز تحولات مثبت در زنجیره صنعت خودرو باشد و حتی احتمال تسری آن به صنعت خودرو در سال آینده نیز وجود خواهد داشت.
🤩در بین لاستیکسازان بورسی نماد #پیزد از اواخر سال گذشته روند صعودی در فروش ماهانه را به ثبت رسانیده…
👍5🔥2😡2❤1👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 276 posts we hold for @InvestmentMind. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@InvestmentMind edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
25 August 2026
Most recent edit
25 August 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 64 posts on @InvestmentMind as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
11 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
47 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
23
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
طلا از نگاه فاندبیس @Fundbase_Gold · 37,970 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 31 August 2026
صندوقها از نگاه فاندبیس @Fundbase_ir · 76,412 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
ETF Plus صندوق اهرمی/طلا @etfplus · 29,706 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
شناسایی تحرکات @Identify_Movements · 33,595 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026
تحلیل کاربردی " هلالات " @validhelalat · 68,380 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 21 August 2026
فردانامه _حسن کاظمزاده @fardaname · 25,041 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 September 2026
آپشن باز - اختیار معامله @OptionBaaz · 19,214 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 5 October 2026
محمد حسین ادیب @adibmh · 69,090 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
ترید فاند @trade_fundd · 25,101 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 September 2026
گروه نوویرا | Novira Group @noviraco · 29,279 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 31 August 2026
سالار صفائی @salarsafaie · 44,089 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
توپولی @topoli · 34,304 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 5 September 2026
گنگ خواب دیده @mortezaebad · 50,743 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
Enigma Investing @enigma_investing · 46,050 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 August 2026
بورسار | مجتبی سلطانی @BoursarMedia · 35,617 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 9 September 2026
پارسیس تحلیل @parsistahlil · 51,326 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
"یادداشتهای مهدی رباطی" @m_robatii · 25,980 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 September 2026
مهدی میرزایی (انستیتو امواج الیوت) @mahdy_mirzaiie · 27,543 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 September 2026
بورس ایران با دکتر وحید کشمیری پور @vahidkeshmirypour · 26,903 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
اقتصاد به زبان ساده @eghtesaderooz · 58,394 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
آگاه یار @Agah_Yar · 19,478 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 October 2026
فاند پلاس @fundplus1 · 31,417 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
بیدار بورس @bidarbourse · 27,399 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 September 2026
آموزش بازار سرمایه بصورت فیلم وصوت ومتن @amozeshbors98 · 55,921 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 30 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آرش مهراز - صندوق” (@InvestmentMind), 24,660 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/InvestmentMind.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.