#کرک_اسپرد ▪️در هفته نخست شهریور ماه،میانگین کرک اسپرد شاخص صنعت به محدوده 28 دلار در هر بشکه رسیده که نسبت به متوسط ماه قبل 5.6 دلار در هر بشکه کاهش داشته است و این افت به طور خاص متاثر از کاهش کرک اسپرد بنزین و پس از ان نفت گاز بوده است. ▪️با فرض حذف کامل تخفیفات خوراک، کرک اسپرد شاخص در شهریورماه همچنان در محدوده ۱۹ دلار قرار میگیرد. میانگین کرک اسپرد تابستان نیز با لحاظ تخفیفات حدود ۳۰ دلار و بدون لحاظ تخفیفات…

Channel
كانال تحليل كارگزاري بارز
@ebarez
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
14,461subscribers
+246 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001007006687 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ebarez |
| Created | 26 September 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ebarez |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “كارگزاري سهام بارز” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 09:58 | 14,461 | +9 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 05:18 | 14,452 | +6 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 13:36 | 14,446 | +15 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 23:39 | 14,431 | +2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 01:17 | 14,429 | +12 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 04:19 | 14,417 | +9 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 00:20 | 14,408 | -2 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:06 | 14,410 | -8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:08 | 14,418 | +3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:34 | 14,415 | -7 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:13 | 14,422 | -8 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 14,430 | +22 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 14,408 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:26 | 14,410 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 14,411 | +24 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 14,387 | +22 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 14,365 | +4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:37 | 14,361 | +27 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 09:54 | 14,334 | +5 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 01:05 | 14,329 | first reading |
Engagement
103 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 23.5%
- avg views ÷ 14,461 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,390
- 13 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 15
- of 103 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 103 (3 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 44,116 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 18:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
#شاخص_کل سورپرایز اتفاق نیافتاد و بازار روال نموداری را درپیش گرفت .قیمت روی روند صعودی پرشیب کوتاه مدت نمودار است که احتمالا امروز آنهم شکسته خواهد شد. بازار بسیار نیاز به اخبار خوش سیاسی دارد. مثل همه ما @ebarez
#شاخص_خودرو بعد از نمودار ایران خودرو از سهام واچلیست ، نمودار شاخص گروه نیز جالب است . قیمت سقف کانال کم شیب صعودی را شکسته و با سقف تاریخی بعنوان اولین هدف ، فاصله ایی 12درصدی دارد . @ebarez
كانال تحليل كارگزاري بارز pinned a photo
#واچ_لیست ارائه سبدی از سهام پرپتانسیل جهت مطالعه و بررسی @ebarez
#فسازان نمودار بروز شده فسازان را ببینیم . علیرغم اینکه با گذشت زمان سقف مثلث واگرای ما بعنوان تارگت قیمت بالاتر رفته است ، دیروز افزایش حجم را سهم شاهد بودیم که میتواند مقدمه ایی برای آغاز تردید در ادامه حرکت صعودی و اصلاح احتمالی باشد . بنابراین بهتر است با توجه به شرایط کلی بازار و نحوه معامله سهم تصمیم گیری گردد. @ebarez
#کرک_اسپرد ▪️در هفته نخست شهریور ماه،میانگین کرک اسپرد شاخص صنعت به محدوده 28 دلار در هر بشکه رسیده که نسبت به متوسط ماه قبل 5.6 دلار در هر بشکه کاهش داشته است و این افت به طور خاص متاثر از کاهش کرک اسپرد بنزین و پس از ان نفت گاز بوده است. ▪️با فرض حذف کامل تخفیفات خوراک، کرک اسپرد شاخص در شهریورماه همچنان در محدوده ۱۹ دلار قرار میگیرد. میانگین کرک اسپرد تابستان نیز با لحاظ تخفیفات حدود ۳۰ دلار و بدون لحاظ تخفیفات…
#خودرو خودرو از سهام اضافه شده با واچلیست بعد از خروج از مثلث ، مشکوک به شکست سقف سال 404 است . خودرو از از جمله سهامی است که زیر سقف 99 در حال معامله بوده و بعد از 33% رشد به آن خواهد رسید . احتمال تسریع در روند حرکت قیمت درصورت شکست 720 ریال وجود دارد . @ebarez
بازار رو بهتر از انتظار میخرند . حتی اهرمیها که معمولا با اخبار منفی بیشتر مستعد ریزش هستند نیز موج دوم فشار فروش را از سرگذرانده اند . شتاب حتی از سقف دیروز هم عبور کرده است . @ebarez
#بورس_کالا #سیمان 📊 در معاملات روز گذشته سیمان 800 هزار تن سیمان عرضه شد که با تقاضای 752 هزار تنی همراه بود و 629 هزار تن معامله شد. ➖بالاترین نرخها در سیمان کیسه مربوط به شرکتهای سیمان صوفیان، ارومیه و هگمتان بوده، سیمانهای هگمتان و بهبهان بیشترین رشد نرخ و سیمان صوفیان بیشترین افت نرخ را نسبت به هفته گذشته داشته اند. ➖بالاترین نرخها در سیمان فله مربوط به شرکتهای سیمان آرتا اردبیل، ارومیه و صوفیان بوده …
#بجهرم یکبار دیگر بجهرم از سهام واچلیست را در تایم فریم روزانه و از نزدیکتر ببینیم . قیمت بعد از حجمهای سنگین هفته گذشته ، بین 340 و 320 ساید شده است و روی نمودار آنچه محتمل بنظر میرسد یک الگوی پرچم مستطیل صعودی است . این الگو با شکست احتمالی 340 تومان شکل خواهد گرفت و پس از آن به اهداف قیمت خواهیم پرداخت . @ebarez
كانال تحليل كارگزاري بارز pinned a photo
Showing the 12 most recent of 103 posts we hold for @ebarez. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@ebarez edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 17 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 17 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@SahamBarezBrokerage · 724 postsریتم بازار-بهرنگ شادرو
@ritmebazaar · 8,8003 postsکانال اطلاعرسانی بارز
@saham_barez · 4,0792 postsتوییتر_بورس
@twitter_bourse · 70,1512 postsبازار پایه | نگاه تحلیلی به اقتصاد و بازارهای مالی |
@only_otc · 12,6731 postbours_Trader
@stockinformationn · 61 postمرکز تحلیل بنیادی
@tahlil_center · 24,6401 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@ritmebazaar · 8,8007 postsکانال اطلاعرسانی بارز
@saham_barez · 4,0794 postsگواهی سپرده کالایی با کارگزاری سهام بارز
@SahamBarezBrokerage · 724 postsتوییتر_بورس
@twitter_bourse · 70,1512 postsبازار پایه | نگاه تحلیلی به اقتصاد و بازارهای مالی |
@only_otc · 12,6731 postbours_Trader
@stockinformationn · 61 postمرکز تحلیل بنیادی
@tahlil_center · 24,6401 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@ebarez named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 26 August 2026 – 26 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@enigma_investing · 45,121
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 August 2026
@Identify_Movements · 35,147
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026
@Capital_DNA · 27,300
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 September 2026
@NAVSTOCK · 32,793
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 September 2026
@fundplus1 · 28,028
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
@rahavard365 · 31,325
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 6 September 2026
@MarketSummary · 21,187
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 September 2026
@trade_fundd · 24,652
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 September 2026
@parsistahlil · 50,306
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
@C0dal724 · 21,812
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 September 2026
@etfplus · 29,312
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
@mtproto70 · 25,023
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 15 September 2026
@validhelalat · 67,555
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 21 August 2026
@eestekhdam_alborz · 28,619
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 9 September 2026
@Fundbase_Gold · 39,070
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 31 August 2026
@kian1one · 53,099
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 25 August 2026
@AgahMoshaver · 46,749
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 27 August 2026
@noviraco · 33,695
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 31 August 2026
@codal_tahlil · 55,636
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026
@m_robatii · 22,426
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 September 2026
@InvestmentMind · 25,025
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
@fardaname · 24,484
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 September 2026
@tsepress · 65,269
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 August 2026
@tahlil_center · 24,640
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 September 2026
This channel appears in 30 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“كانال تحليل كارگزاري بارز” (@ebarez), 14,461 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ebarez.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.