Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Fundvesting | فاندوستینگ

Channel

Fundvesting | فاندوستینگ

@fundvesting

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

18,012subscribers

-195 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001561508562
TypeChannel
Username@fundvesting
Descriptionفاندوستینگ، پلی به سمت ساده‌سازی پیچیدگی‌های صندوق‌های سرمایه‌گذاری آدرس پلتفرم www.Fundvesting.ir ربات صندوق‌یاب فاندوستینگ @Fundvestingdatabot ارتباط با ما @Fundvestingadmin
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held62
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/fundvesting

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 3 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@fundvesting/4000 · this entry8 Nov 2026, 12:26 UTC@tsepress/920858 Nov 2026, 12:40 UTC1.0014 minutes
@tsepress/9218510 Nov 2026, 07:25 UTC@fundvesting/4021 · this entry10 Nov 2026, 09:10 UTC1.001.7 hours
@sedayebourse/1818278 Nov 2026, 11:58 UTC@fundvesting/4003 · this entry8 Nov 2026, 16:38 UTC1.004.7 hours
@fundvesting/4011 · this entry9 Nov 2026, 10:45 UTC@sedayebourse/1819139 Nov 2026, 13:13 UTC1.002.5 hours
@fundvesting/4014 · this entry10 Nov 2026, 06:33 UTC@sedayebourse/18199810 Nov 2026, 14:16 UTC1.007.7 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@tsepress8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9925 minuteseven
@sedayebourse5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.001.9 hoursthis entry (3–2)
@twitter_bourse11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0050 minutesthis entry (8–3)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 4 of the 4 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 278 comparable posts for this entry, running 1 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 13 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

17,98018,21018,09518,0126 August 202611 November 2026
62 measurements spanning 97 days, net -195. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,946–18,245 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 08:0118,012+32
9 Nov 2026, 14:4517,980-9
8 Nov 2026, 07:5117,989-16
7 Nov 2026, 05:4118,005-4
6 Nov 2026, 04:2518,009-4
5 Nov 2026, 03:4518,013-7
4 Nov 2026, 00:2118,020-6
2 Nov 2026, 21:2718,026+2
2 Nov 2026, 00:1018,024-11
31 Oct 2026, 23:5618,035-6
30 Oct 2026, 21:1518,041-4
29 Oct 2026, 18:2918,045+4
28 Oct 2026, 21:2018,041-12
27 Oct 2026, 19:3918,053-5
26 Oct 2026, 20:2818,058-8
25 Oct 2026, 20:1018,066+1
24 Oct 2026, 20:4618,065-4
23 Oct 2026, 22:1618,069+1
22 Oct 2026, 20:1018,068+2
21 Oct 2026, 13:0918,066first reading

Engagement

294 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 76 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.10%
avg views ÷ 18,012 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,640
96 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.442%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
96
of 294 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 82 of 96 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held294 (1 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total157,420
Reactions total633
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 04:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,200
Videos
≈85
Links
≈442

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
8m 38s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,705 reactions across 276 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,24333.5%
👍76920.8%
👌39310.6%
👏2787.50%
🔥1995.37%
👎1885.07%
🤬1604.32%
🙏1463.94%
😁1433.86%
😭591.59%
🥴270.729%
😱220.594%
😍170.459%
❤‍🔥150.405%
⚡140.378%
💯100.27%
🏆90.243%
🎉50.135%
🤩50.135%
🥰30.081%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 279 of the 294 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,720 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 294 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 96 posts held from the last 30 days (3.13%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 06:32 UTC≈1,460 views11 reactionsread 13 November 2026

وقتی حباب اهرمی‌ها هنوز منفی است، چطور حباب یک صندوق مثبت شده؟ 📌 میانگین موزون حباب صندوق‌های اهرمی در پایان ۱۹ آبان هنوز منفی ۷٫۶٪ بود؛ یعنی قیمت معاملاتی بخش بزرگی از این بازار نتوانسته هم‌پای ارزش خالص دارایی صندوق‌ها بایستد. در همین فضا، پیشران با حباب مثبت معامله می‌شود؛ فاصله‌ای که نشان می‌دهد تقاضا برای واحدهای آن از الگوی غالب گروه جدا شده است. 🔹حباب منفیِ گسترده را نمی‌شود فقط یک عدد روی تابلو دید. وقتی NA…

❤6👍5

11 Nov 2026, 14:29 UTC≈1,240 viewsread 13 November 2026
Video

سرمایه‌گذاری در یک قاب رونمایی اپلیکیشن مدیریت دارایی کاردان: 🔸مسیر ساده سرمایه‌گذاری 🔸سرمایه‌گذاری در هر زمان و مکان 🔸خریدوفروش انواع صندوق‌ها ثبت‌نام و اطلاعات بیشتر: https://krdn.app/investapp ۰۲۱۹۹۶۶۲۱۱۰۰ - داخلی ۲ تامین سرمایه کاردان

11 Nov 2026, 12:44 UTC≈2,000 views17 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

مایکت زیر قیمت عرضه؛ خرید متفاوت فارمانی! 📌در جریان عرضه اولیه مایکت، بررسی قیمت خرید ۲۰ صندوق سرمایه‌گذاری نشان می‌دهد که اختلاف قابل‌توجهی میان قیمت‌های ثبت‌شده وجود داشته است. در این میان، صندوق فارمانی با قیمت ۱۸۹٬۰۰۹ ریال، پایین‌ترین قیمت خرید را ثبت کرد؛ قیمتی که ۳.۷۵ درصد کمتر از قیمت عرضه اولیه مایکت بود. 🔹نکته جالب اینکه این اتفاق برای فارمانی تازگی ندارد. این صندوق در عرضه اولیه سیمکات نیز پایین‌ترین قیمت…

❤13👎2🙏2

11 Nov 2026, 10:50 UTC≈1,700 views16 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

حکشتی بخریم یا ناوگان؟! 📌در ماه‌های گذشته، حکشتی یکی از نمادهای پربازده و موردتوجه بازار سهام بوده و رشد قابل‌توجه قیمت آن، نگاه بسیاری از سرمایه‌گذاران را به صنعت حمل‌ونقل جلب کرده است. اما نکته جالب اینجاست که در همین دوره، صندوق بخشی ناوگان توانسته حتی بازدهی بیشتری از حکشتی به ثبت برساند. 📈بر اساس مقایسه عملکرد تا ۲۰ آبان ۱۴۰۵، بازدهی ناوگان به ۱۰۲.۴۱ درصد رسیده، درحالی‌که حکشتی بازدهی ۸۷.۴۱ درصدی داشته است؛ اخ…

❤7👌4👏4👎1

11 Nov 2026, 10:15 UTC≈1,460 views10 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

۱۵ درصد اختلاف در یک بازار؛ گنج برنده رقابت طلایی‌ها ⚡️بازار طلا در یک سال گذشته بازدهی قابل‌توجهی برای سرمایه‌گذاران به همراه داشته و بررسی عملکرد صندوق‌های طلا نیز نشان می‌دهد که تمامی صندوق‌های مورد بررسی بازدهی بیش از ۱۱۸ درصدی ثبت کرده‌اند. بااین‌حال، نکته مهم، اختلاف قابل‌توجه بازدهی میان صندوق‌هایی است که همگی در یک کلاس دارایی فعالیت می‌کنند. 🪙در این میان، صندوق گنج با ثبت بازدهی ۱۳۳.۸۱ درصدی بر اساس NAV، ر…

👏7👌2🔥1

11 Nov 2026, 08:36 UTC≈1,590 views10 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

نرخ درآمدثابت سپر به ۴۱.۲۵٪ افزایش یافت بالاترین نرخ در میان تمام درآمدثابت‌های بازار! 📌رقابت بر سر نرخ بازدهی در صندوق‌های درآمدثابت طی هفته‌های اخیر وارد مرحله تازه‌ای شده است. افزایش نرخ در بسیاری از صندوق‌ها نشان می‌دهد که حفظ جذابیت برای سرمایه‌گذاران و رقابت بر سر جذب منابع، به یکی از اولویت‌های اصلی مدیران این صندوق‌ها تبدیل شده است. 🔼در تازه‌ترین تغییر، صندوق سپر نرخ مؤثر سالانه خود را به ۴۱.۲۵ درصد رسانده …

🔥5👌3❤1👏1

11 Nov 2026, 07:33 UTC≈1,200 views12 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @Arvin_CapitalPhoto

📊 بازدهی جذاب، زمانی ارزشمندتر می‌شود که با مدیریت ریسک همراه باشد... ✅ صندوق سرمایه‌گذاری با درآمد ثابت شفق، تحت مدیریت سبدگردان آروین، با ثبت بازدهی سالانه ٪۴۲.۰۴، فرصت قابل‌توجهی را برای سرمایه‌گذارانی فراهم کرده که به دنبال تعادل میان بازدهی و ریسک هستند. ✅ریسک پایین‌تر نسبت به سرمایه‌گذاری مستقیم در سهام، نقدشوندگی بالا، مدیریت حرفه‌ای و ترکیب بهینه دارایی‌ها، از ویژگی‌های شفق است. 🟢شفق؛ انتخابی هوشمندانه برا…

❤5👍4🔥3

11 Nov 2026, 06:41 UTC≈1,360 views9 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

نوبت به هم‌وزن رسید؟ 🔹شاخص کل در این ماه فقط ۱٫۱۲٪ رشد کرده، اما شاخص هم‌وزن ۷٫۶۲٪ بالا رفته است. این شکاف نشان می‌دهد اگر تنها شاخص کل را مبنای قضاوت بگذاریم، بخش مهمی از حرکت سهام در این دوره دیده نمی‌شود. 🔹در میان صندوق‌های شاخصیِ نمودار، صندوق هم‌وزن با بازدهی ۱۰٫۵۰٪ در صدر ایستاده؛ ۲٫۸۸ واحد درصد بالاتر از خود شاخص هم‌وزن. هم‌تراز با ۸٫۵۱٪ تنها صندوق دیگر این فهرست است که از شاخص هم‌وزن جلو زده؛ بازدهی سایر صن…

❤5🏆2👍2

11 Nov 2026, 06:18 UTC≈1,020 views2 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @vistaamcPhoto

🚗 بهین‌رو، بزرگترین صندوق خودرویی بازار سرمایه 🟠صنعت خودرو ظرفیت‌های قابل‌توجهی برای سودآوری دارد و شناسایی این فرصت‌ها، نیازمند تحلیل دقیق و نگاهی هوشمندانه به تحولات صنعت است. صندوق بخشی بهین‌رو با حدود ۱.۴ همت دارایی تحت مدیریت و تمرکز ۸۳ درصدی بر شرکت‌های خودرویی و قطعه‌سازی، بزرگ‌ترین صندوق خودرویی بازار سرمایه است. 🟠بهین‌رو در شش ماه گذشته ٪۹۰ سود برای سرمایه‌گذاران خود، کسب کرده است. برای سرمایه‌گذاری «بهین‌…

👍2

11 Nov 2026, 05:57 UTC≈1,390 views6 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

اهرمی‌ها همچنان بر مدار مثبت.... 🔹حباب دوایکس هم بعد از پیشران مثبت شد! 🔹درحال حاضر حباب سایر صندوق‌های اهرمی بین شش تا هشت درصد منفی است. 🗓 ۲۰ آبان ۱۴۰۵ 📱 @fundvesting

❤6

10 Nov 2026, 14:15 UTC839 viewsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @mofidsecuritiesofficial

Posted without readable text

10 Nov 2026, 12:12 UTC926 viewsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @mofidsecuritiesofficial

Posted without readable text

Showing the 12 most recent of 294 posts we hold for @fundvesting. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@fundvesting edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
17 August 2026
Most recent edit
21 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

گروه خدمات مالی نهایت‌نگر
@NahayatNegar_Analysis · 13,812
4 posts
Danak Capital | سبدگردان داناک
@danakcapital · 86
4 posts
DariushCapital
@dariushcapital · 574
3 posts
استراتژی برتر
@BourseStrategi · 15,669
2 posts
سبدگردان قلک
@Gholack_AMC · 6,031
2 posts
سهام عدالت
@sahamedalatbours · 11,728
2 posts
مشهد فارابی
@tahlil_sanat_msh · 256
2 posts
TSE Channel
@tsechannel · 1,939
2 posts
سیگنال برتر
@ChanelVIP20 · 51,607
1 post
گلدن بورس
@Goldenn_Bourse · 48,708
1 post
HoOshe Mali
@Hooshe_mali_asvian · 95
1 post
پویش تفکر مستقل
@IndependentThinking · 15,439
1 post
نیما دانایی
@Nima_danaii · 18,381
1 post
سلاطین نوسانگیری👑
@Salatine_navasan · 10,310
1 post
تاپ سیگنال (Vip)
@VIP_Top_Signal · 19,527
1 post
پذیره‌نویسی و عرضه‌اولیه
@arze_avalieh · 11,823
1 post
کانال عرضه اولیه
@arzeh1avalieha · 95,712
1 post
کارگزاری اقتصاد بیدار کاشان
@bidar_invest · 481
1 post
بورس پول (یوسفی)
@bourse_poll · 40,625
1 post
گلدن سیگنال (ویژه)
@goldenn_signall · 20,487
1 post
سبدگردان هدف
@hadafamc · 1,306
1 post
حاج رضا علیپور
@hajreza_s · 13,854
1 post
InvestSho | اینوست‌شو
@investsho · 848
1 post
سبدگردان کارا
@karavest · 218
1 post
Mazdax | مزدکس
@mazdaxmarket · 1,535
1 post
سهم سبز
@sahmsabzz · 10,823
1 post
صندوقهای برتر بورسی
@sandoghbartar · 25,038
1 post
صدای بورس
@sedayebourse · 25,429
1 post
تحلیل صلواتی
@signal743 · 50,854
1 post
سلطان بورس
@soltanboure · 25,389
1 post
اخبار بورس | Tse Press
@tsepress · 65,960
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 36 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ETF Plus صندوق اهرمی/طلا
@etfplus · 29,708
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
گروه نوویرا | Novira Group
@noviraco · 29,152
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 31 August 2026
ترید فاند
@trade_fundd · 25,183
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 September 2026
طلا از نگاه فاندبیس
@Fundbase_Gold · 37,918
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 31 August 2026
محسن تحلیل | Mohsen Tahlil
@mohsen_tahlil · 38,980
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 1 September 2026
صندوق‌ها از نگاه فاندبیس
@Fundbase_ir · 75,887
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
گروه مالی فیروزه | Firouzeh
@firouzeh · 52,384
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 8 September 2026
گروه مالی فارابی
@farabinvest · 51,882
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 24 August 2026
EconomyReza | اکونومی رضا
@economy_reza · 20,344
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 30 September 2026
مطالعات اقتصادى بامداد
@bamdad_institute · 23,604
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 September 2026
استخدام در نهادهای مالی - کانون کارگزاران
@SEBAemployment · 26,807
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 September 2026
صدای بورس
@sedayebourse · 25,429
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 27 September 2026
نبض بورس | اخبار بورس
@nabzebourse_ir · 28,024
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 September 2026
آپشن باز - اختیار معامله
@OptionBaaz · 19,214
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 5 October 2026
گروه مالی مفید
@mofidsecuritiesofficial · 79,016
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 August 2026
مرکز تحلیل بنیادی
@tahlil_center · 23,698
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 September 2026
آرش مهراز - صندوق
@InvestmentMind · 24,638
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
کانال آموزشی پیشرفت مالی
@pishrafte2h · 48,941
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 August 2026
عرضه اولیه
@arzebours · 19,293
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 2 October 2026
کانال کدال 724
@C0dal724 · 23,286
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 September 2026
فردانامه _حسن کاظم‌زاده
@fardaname · 25,041
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 September 2026
توپولی
@topoli · 34,621
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 5 September 2026
آوای آگاه
@AgahMoshaver · 47,113
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 27 August 2026
Kian1one | کیانوان
@kian1one · 53,884
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 91 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Fundvesting | فاندوستینگ” (@fundvesting), 18,012 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fundvesting.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.