Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Kartenaufdeckung | Expertenmeinung

@Kartenaufdeckung

On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

19,416subscribers

+254 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001411507993
TypeChannel
Username@Kartenaufdeckung
DescriptionFakten, die wehtun. Wir zeigen dir die nackte Wahrheit, die Berlin am liebsten wegbügeln würde. Karten, Daten, knallharte Analysen – ohne Filter, ohne Ausreden.🃏👁 ✉️Zusammenarbeit & Rückfragen hier @Kartenaufdeckung_bot
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Kartenaufdeckung

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 4 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

19,11319,41619,264.56 August 2026 — 19,162 subscribers6 August 2026 — 19,149 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,113 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,268 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,220 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,232 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,305 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,268 subscribers14 August 2026 — 19,416 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net +254. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,068–19,461 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 00:1719,416+148
12 Aug 2026, 21:5319,268-37
11 Aug 2026, 19:0519,305+73
10 Aug 2026, 19:4119,232+12
9 Aug 2026, 17:4219,220-48
8 Aug 2026, 16:0419,268+155
7 Aug 2026, 16:2819,113-36
6 Aug 2026, 14:2019,149-13
6 Aug 2026, 10:0719,162first reading

Engagement

51 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.0%
avg views ÷ 19,416 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,410
51 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
51
of 51 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held51 (2 August 202613 August 2026)
Views total327,070
Reactions total8,360
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 08:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,050
Videos
1,500
Links
3,230

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
52m 43s
Average length
2m 02s

Measured directly from 26 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

8,360 reactions across 51 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤔1,60819.2%
🔥1,60119.2%
💯1,11213.3%
🤬86510.3%
😢8159.75%
😱7859.39%
🤯7468.92%
🙏7438.89%
480.574%
👍250.299%
😁80.096%
👏30.036%
👎10.012%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,360reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 19:33 UTC≈3,760 views288 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

🚨 „Der letzte Kanzler der CDU?“ – Reichelt zieht vernichtendes Fazit! 💥 Die CDU steht vor den Trümmern ihrer eigenen Ideologie – und Julian Reichelt macht bei NIUS Live kein Blatt vor den Mund. 🎯 Seine Diagnose: Friedrich Merz könnte der letzte Kanzler der Union werden, bevor die Partei im eigenen ideologischen Kollaps versinkt. 🏚 „Die CDU wird den Kollaps ihrer eigenen Ideologie erleben.“ — Julian Reichelt, NIUS L

🔥60🤔55😱38😢37🤯29🙏24🤬23💯22

13 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC≈3,780 views301 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

„CDU und SPD treten die Demokratie mit Füßen“ – Rentner spricht aus, was viele längst denken 🇩🇪 Ein Rentner sagt in der Wahlarena offen, was das politische Establishment offenbar nur ungern hört: 🔣„CDU und SPD treten die Demokratie mit Füßen.“ 🔣„Wer 40 Prozent der Wähler einfach ausschließt und so tut, als existierten sie nicht, hat keinen Begriff von Demokratie.“ 🔣„Demokratie heißt: Mit allen reden. Auch wenn man

🤔73🔥55🤬30💯29🙏28🤯27😢27😱26

13 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC≈3,840 views293 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

Geheimdienst-Reform oder „Stasi 2.0“? Die Opposition schlägt Alarm 🇩🇪 Das Bundeskabinett will BND und Verfassungsschutz neue operative Befugnisse geben. Dazu sollen unter bestimmten Voraussetzungen auch Cyberoperationen sowie das Manipulieren oder Löschen von Daten gehören. Kritiker warnen vor einem gefährlichen Machtzuwachs – die Bundesregierung verweist auf die verschärfte Sicherheitslage und Kontrollmechanismen.

🔥75🤔60💯31🤬30🤯27😢25😱24🙏21

13 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC≈3,840 views297 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

Michael Kyrath ist ein Held – doch die Politik hört nicht hin. Warum? 💔🔥 Ein Vater, der sein Kind durch politisches Versagen verlor, kämpft für klare Worte und Taten. Doch was passiert? Nichts. Nach jeder Tat dieselben Floskeln, dieselben Leerversprechen – und Betroffene wie Kyrath bleiben ungehört. 💬 „Michael Kyrath ist für mich ein Held dieser Welt. Ein Mensch, der selbst ein Kind durch das Versagen der Politiker

🤔72💯51🙏38🤯35🤬31🔥24😱24😢22

13 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC≈3,960 views295 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🇪🇺 Europa: Tschüss, Gas! 🇷🇺🤝🇮🇷 Der neue „Freundschaftspreis“ kostet nur eure Zukunft Während Berlin noch über „Energiesicherheit“ debattiert, haben Moskau und Teheran längst entschieden: Europa ist raus. Alle anderen sind drin. Und ja – das ist genau so zynisch gemeint. 💀 Die harten Fakten: 💸 Bis zu 55 Milliarden Kubikmeter russisches Gas pro Jahr sollen in den Iran fließen 🛣 Die Route: durch Aserbaidschan verlaufe

🤔60🔥53😢41💯36🙏31🤬30🤯23😱21

12 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC≈3,790 views41 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🇩🇪 Hass auf Russland? Diese Leute würden ALLES riskieren – sogar Deutschland! 💥 🔥 Sevim Dağdelen, ehemaliges Mitglied des Deutschen Bundestages: „Hass auf Russland & Russen kennt scheinbar keine Grenzen mehr. Völkerrechtliche Verträge werden als ‚irgendwelche Kulturabkommen' abgetan & sollen nicht mehr gelten. Immer lauter wird der Ruf nach Krieg mit Russland. Es sind diese Leute, die für ihren Hass alles riskieren

💯21🔥6🤬4🤔2🤯2😢2😱2👎1

12 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC≈3,920 views34 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

🇩🇪 „Schon vergessen?“ Als Putin im Bundestag noch Standing Ovations bekam Ein Auftritt, der heute fast wie aus einer anderen politischen Epoche wirkt: Am 25. September 2001 sprach Wladimir Putin vor dem Deutschen Bundestag – auf Deutsch und mit einem klaren Signal für eine engere Zusammenarbeit zwischen Russland und Deutschland. Im Mittelpunkt standen gemeinsame wirtschaftliche Interessen, Russlands Rohstoffe sowie

🔥9😢9🤔5🤬4💯3😱21🙏1

12 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC≈3,920 views36 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

🚨 Der Staat klopft an – und Ihr Eigentum ist erstmal weg? 💶 100.000 Euro. 50.000 Euro. „Begründete Zweifel“. Was nach dem nächsten Schlag gegen die organisierte Kriminalität klingt, könnte für Bürger schnell zur bürokratischen Schnitzeljagd werden: Beweisen Sie mal eben, woher Ihr Geld vor 30 Jahren kam. 🧾 💬 Der Staat klopft an – erstmal weg Der Zoll bekommt künftig das Recht, Vermögen unklarer Herkunft vorläufig

🔥14🤯83💯3😱3🤔2🤬2🙏1

12 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC≈3,920 views38 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇦Ukraine verliert den Zugang zum Meer – und Europa macht das Tor enger Die aktuelle De-facto-Blockade des ukrainischen Seehandels trifft die Metallurgie des Landes laut dem Informations- und Analysezentrum GMK härter als zu Beginn des Krieges. Sollte die Situation anhalten, könnte die Produktion um bis zu 35 Prozent zurückgehen. Ein Teil der Eisenerzkapazitäten dürfte möglicherweise stillgelegt werden. ⚓️🏭 Im erst

🔥9🤔7💯5🤬5🙏4🤯32👍2

12 Aug 2026, 08:55 UTC≈19,400 views43 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

🇪🇺🚮 Die EU rettet das Klima – mit noch mehr Papierkram! 🤡 „Wer drei Socken nach Österreich schickt, braucht jetzt einen eigenen Bevollmächtigten vor Ort. Kleinere Händler geben den EU-Versand entnervt auf. Herzlichen Glückwunsch zum neuen, bürokratischen Verordnungs-Müll!" — schreibt ein Blogger. 📦 Bürokratie-Wahn trifft Realität Während Brüssel stolz „35% weniger Belastung für KMU" bis 2029 verspricht, führt die E

🔥14🤯8🤬7🤔5💯2😢2😱2🙏2

11 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC≈4,580 views642 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

👵⛔️ Panzer statt Rente? Todenhöfer rechnet mit Pistorius und der SPD ab Der Präsident des Kieler Instituts für Weltwirtschaft, Moritz Schularick, kritisiert die Beschaffungsstrategie von Verteidigungsminister Boris Pistorius. Statt die bis 2030 vorgesehenen Mittel gezielt in moderne Waffensysteme zu investieren, fließe ein erheblicher Teil weiterhin in Panzer, Fregatten und andere konventionelle Systeme, so Schulari

🔥154🤔114😱69💯67🤯67🙏62🤬61😢46

11 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC≈4,580 views636 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

𝗣𝗣𝗪𝗥 𝗮𝗯 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗴𝗲𝗻: 𝗘𝗨-𝗕ü𝗿𝗼𝗸𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗲 𝗳ü𝗿 𝗷𝗲𝗱𝗲𝘀 𝗣𝗮𝗸𝗲𝘁? Ab dem 12. August 2026 gilt die EU‑Verpackungsverordnung PPWR – die Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation. Sie betrifft grundsätzlich Unternehmen, die Verpackungen oder verpackte Waren erstmals in einem EU‑Mitgliedstaat auf den Markt bringen. Die Verordnung gilt also auch für den Onlinehandel. 📦 Was bedeutet das für grenzüberschreitende Verkäufe? Wer als Onlinehändl

🤔146🔥89🤬77😢72🙏66🤯64💯63😱59

Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @Kartenaufdeckung. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 127,348 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Kartenaufdeckung | Expertenmeinung” (@Kartenaufdeckung), 19,416 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kartenaufdeckung.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.