Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Incrypted Airdrops

@incrypted_airdrops

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

47,963subscribers

-262 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001320367465
TypeChannel
Username@incrypted_airdrops
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/incrypted_airdrops

Growth

47,96348,22548,0946 August 2026 — 48,225 subscribers6 August 2026 — 48,225 subscribers7 August 2026 — 48,218 subscribers8 August 2026 — 48,186 subscribers9 August 2026 — 48,160 subscribers10 August 2026 — 48,121 subscribers11 August 2026 — 48,099 subscribers12 August 2026 — 48,048 subscribers13 August 2026 — 48,014 subscribers14 August 2026 — 47,963 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 8 days, net -262. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 47,924–48,264 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 17:2347,963-51
13 Aug 2026, 09:0348,014-34
12 Aug 2026, 07:2348,048-51
11 Aug 2026, 04:2448,099-22
10 Aug 2026, 05:0148,121-39
9 Aug 2026, 07:5448,160-26
8 Aug 2026, 05:3748,186-32
7 Aug 2026, 03:0548,218-7
6 Aug 2026, 08:4548,225no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:3948,225first reading

Engagement

45 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.44%
avg views ÷ 47,963 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,130
45 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.523%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
45
of 45 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held45 (28 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total95,855
Reactions total501
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

419 reactions across 39 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍12930.8%
❤‍🔥8720.8%
8319.8%
🥰348.11%
🔥317.40%
👌235.49%
👏122.86%
92.15%
🎉51.19%
🏆30.716%
👀10.239%
🗿10.239%
😎10.239%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 501reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC261 views8 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Открываем паблик-доступ к торговому боту для Variational В продолжение предыдущего поста: чтобы забрать награды из пула на $1 млн и 150 000 поинтов, трейдерам нужно набивать целевые объемы от $1 млн до $50 млн. Крутить такие цифры руками — долго, сложно и чревато сливом депозита на комиссиях. По многочисленным просьбам комьюнити мы выводим нашего торгового бота в открытый доступ! Софт поддерживает как ручной режим

❤‍🔥321🏆1🥰1

14 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC730 views3 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Variational выделили $1 млн и 150 000 поинтов для топовых трейдеров Команда PerpDEX Variational решила провести агрессивную маркетинговую кампанию и переманить ликвидность с других площадок. Они отобрали 10 000 самых активных ончейн-трейдеров с других перпов (исключив маркетмейкеров), которые еще не зарегистрированы на Variational, и выделили на их онбординг солидный пул наград. Это сильный маркер того, что у коман

1👀1🔥1

14 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC934 views12 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Отжимка по дропам за 12.08 - 14.08 В рамках рубрики «Отжимка» собрали для вас актуальные события в сфере дропов и не только, за прошедшие дни: 🟥Nado: фармить поинты под дроп INK стало еще проще. В нашем боте появилась функция Magic Button для полной автоматизации торговли и фарма. Подробности — в посте; 🟥BitRobot: проект в сфере воплощенного ИИ и робототехники (инвест $6 млн) открыл доступ к Robotics Lab для всех

5👍3🔥2❤‍🔥1🥰1

13 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTC≈1,390 views10 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Набор в Incrypted+ стартовал! Если кажется, что "на рынке нечего делать" – проблема не в рынке. Возможности есть даже сейчас, вопрос в том, есть ли у вас система и правильное окружение. Сегодня стартует новый набор в Incrypted+ – следующий шаг для тех, кто хочет работать с рынком. Внутри: - ежедневные торговые идеи, сетапы, ToDo-листы и аналитика; - курсы по Smart Money, скальпингу, ончейну и аирдропам; - направле

3🎉3❤‍🔥2🏆1🥰1

13 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC≈1,390 views8 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Второй раунд Bybit Galaxy: забираем свою долю из пула на $200 000 Неделю назад мы уже разбирали запуск Bybit Galaxy — масштабной программы лояльности, конкурирующей с Binance Alpha. На днях стартовал второй раунд. Призовой пул остался прежним — 200 000 USDC, а награду смогут забрать первые 5 000 участников в лидерборде. ✨Математика фарма Поскольку поинты начисляются по логарифмической шкале, тупо крутить оборот в

👍3❤‍🔥21🔥1🥰1

13 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC≈1,500 views12 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Фармим поинты на early-стадии в Dow Protocol Dow Protocol — это RWA-инфраструктура для мгновенного ончейн-финансирования e-commerce. Проект направлен на токенизацию реальных активов, объединяя традиционный бизнес и крипту. Проект собрал $19,5 млн инвестиций от OKX Ventures, Animoca Brands, Arcane Group и других. Сейчас у проекта стартовала ранняя стадия фарма поинтов. Пока доступны только базовые социалки и рефера

❤‍🔥4👍4🥰2👌1👏1

12 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC≈1,800 views9 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🫡 Набор в Incrypted+ стартует уже завтра! Напоминаем, что 13 августа в 17:00 мы откроем новый набор в Incrypted+ (подробнее писали тут). До старта осталось совсем немного времени — уже сейчас можно забронировать место и зафиксировать выгодные условия. Все максимально просто — бронь можно оформить буквально в пару кликов. Если планировали присоединиться к Incrypted+, самое время забронировать место по ссылке 👈 Air

👍32❤‍🔥2🔥1🥰1

12 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC≈1,820 views17 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Отжимка по дропам за 10.08 - 12.08 В рамках рубрики «Отжимка» собрали для вас актуальные события в сфере дропов и не только, за прошедшие дни: 🟥Nado: фармить поинты под дроп INK стало еще проще. В нашем боте появилась функция Magic Button для полной автоматизации торговли и фарма. Подробности — в посте; 🟥Doma: протокол запускает основную сеть уже сегодня, 12 августа в 13:00 (Киев). Команда позиционирует платформу

❤‍🔥6👍5👏41🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 18:54 UTC≈1,830 views10 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Стартовала вторая неделя Nado Rewards: делим пул на $100 000 На прошлой неделе состоялся запуск программы Nado Rewards, а со стартом второй недели команда выкатила важный апдейт. Разработчики прислушались к фидбеку комьюнити и упростили условия разблокировки наград. Учитывая, что мы и так активно фармим поинты под дроп токена INK, это идеальная возможность получать прямые выплаты в USDT0 «здесь и сейчас», перекрыва

4👍3❤‍🔥1🔥1🥰1

11 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC≈1,740 views11 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

☄Стрим стартовал! Подключайтесь: Смотреть стрим Смотреть стрим Смотреть стрим Airdrops | News | Incrypted+

👏322❤‍🔥2🥰2

11 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC≈1,750 views12 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Важные апдейты по аирдропам 🟥WheelX Кроссчейн-агрегатор запустил свою амбассадорскую программу. Команда сразу подтвердила ежемесячные награды — пул в размере $1 000 в стейблкоинах. Что делать? • Изучаем детали кампании в их статье; • заполняем форму на участие. 🟥Extended Команда провела бритву сибилов за воштрейдинг и другие манипуляции. Под раздачу попало 4 017 аккаунтов, у которых суммарно изъяли 5 млн поинтов

👍62👏2❤‍🔥1🥰1

11 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC≈1,660 views9 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Incrypted Plus – отчет за июль 🫡 incrypted.com/incrypted-plus-otchet-za-iyul-2026/ Прошлый месяц для Incrypted+ получился одним из самых насыщенных за последнее время. Несмотря на достаточно нестабильный рынок, всего за июль внутри сообщества: - отработали мем-нарратив в Robinhood Chain; - сделали +123% на мем-портфеле в ветке идей и отдельно поймали CZ Bull на 90х, PIPEDOG на 15х, ANSEMIUS на 6х и десятки других!

👌32❤‍🔥2🏆1👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @incrypted_airdrops. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 66,867 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

КриптоКабан
@TheCryptoBoar · 136,593
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 August 2026
HOT DROPS 🎁
@drops_on_hot · 906,845
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 August 2026
Канал Ростіка
@crypto_rostik · 118,646
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
BYBIT Новости
@BybitRussian_News · 119,222
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 August 2026
VERONA Announcements
@verona_announcements · 121,575
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Incrypted Airdrops” (@incrypted_airdrops), 47,963 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/incrypted_airdrops.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.