Channel
@Arafatbinhassan
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
29,541subscribers
+11 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001007269511 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Arafatbinhassan |
| Description | حساب التلجرام الرسمي للشيخ د. عرفات بن حسن المحمدي. يُعنى بنشر المواد العلمية للشيخ والآثار وفوائد مقتطفة من كلام الأئمة. للتواصل: [email protected] |
| Created | 30 October 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Arafatbinhassan |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2026, 12:23 | 29,541 | +5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:44 | 29,536 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:28 | 29,539 | +5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 29,534 | +4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:37 | 29,530 | +7 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:52 | 29,523 | -15 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:42 | 29,538 | -7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 29,545 | +5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 29,540 | +11 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:20 | 29,529 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:52 | 29,530 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:09 | 29,530 | first reading |
108 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 108 (4 August 2026 – 18 August 2026) |
| Views total | 189,836 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 19 Aug 2026, 02:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 63 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
【سؤال وجواب】 ༺═──────────────═༻ «ما حكم تنسيق منافسة كرة القدم بين الإخوة مع جائزة للفائزين، ولكن يُشترط على كل مشارك أو فريق أن يدفع مبلغًا للمشاركة؟» 🎙️ لفضيلةِ الشيخِ الدكتور: عرفات بن حسن المحمدي حفظهُ اللهُ ورعاه 📡ضمن دورة الإمام ابن سيرين في الفلبين حرسها الله ༺═──────────────═༻ 🔗 | http://t.me/arafatbinhassan
【سؤال وجواب】 ༺═──────────────═༻ «حكم وضع معلومات مزيفة، مثل رقم جواز السفر أو البريد الإلكتروني، عند اختبار الثغرات الأمنية في المواقع، وهل يُعدّ ذلك من الكذب؟» 🎙️ لفضيلةِ الشيخِ الدكتور: عرفات بن حسن المحمدي حفظهُ اللهُ ورعاه 📡ضمن دورة الإمام ابن سيرين في الفلبين حرسها الله ༺═──────────────═༻ 🔗 | http://t.me/arafatbinhassan
• ༺═───────────═༻ ➤ شرح كتاب: «التوحيد الذي هو حق الله على العبيد» ◅[الدرس: ٣٦] 🎙 لفضيلة الشيخ الدكتور: عرفات بن حسن المحمدي حفظه الله ورعاه ༺═───────────═༻ • 🔗 | https://t.me/Arafatbinhassan
Video, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
【سؤال وجواب】 ༺═──────────────═༻ «يقال إن الدعوة السلفية، أو الدعوة إلى العقيدة والتوحيد، تفرّق الأمة الإسلامية، فهل هذا صحيح؟» 🎙️ لفضيلةِ الشيخِ الدكتور: عرفات بن حسن المحمدي حفظهُ اللهُ ورعاه 📡ضمن دورة الإمام ابن سيرين في الفلبين حرسها الله ༺═──────────────═༻ 🔗 | http://t.me/arafatbinhassan
【سؤال وجواب】 ༺═──────────────═༻ «يحتج بعض الدعاة بأن المحدثين قبلوا حديث بعض المبتدعة، ويصفون منهج السلفيين اليوم بالتشدد، ويقولون إنه أمر محدث، فكيف يُرد عليهم؟» 🎙️ لفضيلةِ الشيخِ الدكتور: عرفات بن حسن المحمدي حفظهُ اللهُ ورعاه 📡ضمن دورة الإمام ابن سيرين في الفلبين حرسها الله ༺═──────────────═༻ 🔗 | http://t.me/arafatbinhassan
Video, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
[البيان في أسئلة تختصُّ بالمواليد والصِّبيان] 133- من تلزمه زكاة فطر المولود؟ تلزم زكاة الفطر على الأب، فهو من تجب عليه النَّفقة، وإن لم يكن له أب وللمولود مال فتجب في ماله. عرفات المحمدي
[البيان في أسئلة تختصُّ بالمواليد والصِّبيان] 132- هل تجب زكاة الفطر على المولود؟ تجب زكاة الفطر على المولود، فقد فرض رسول الله ﷺ زكاة الفطر صاعًا من تمر أو صاعًا من شعير على العبد والحر والذكر والأنثى والصَّغير والكبير من المسلمين. (متفق عليه). عرفات المحمدي
Showing the 12 most recent of 108 posts we hold for @Arafatbinhassan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@Arafatbinhassan edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 4,908 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 53 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“عرفات بن حسن المحمدي” (@Arafatbinhassan), 29,541 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Arafatbinhassan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.