Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for На весах Сунны

Channel

На весах Сунны

@mizan_islam

On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,521subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001462635815
TypeChannel
Username@mizan_islam
Created30 January 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mizan_islam

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

2,5172,5222,519.56 August 2026 — 2,522 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,522 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,517 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,520 subscribers15 August 2026 — 2,521 subscribers2,5216 August 202615 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 9 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,516–2,523 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 19:032,521+1
12 Aug 2026, 17:372,520+3
9 Aug 2026, 16:222,517-5
6 Aug 2026, 11:162,522no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:302,522first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 14s
Average length
3m 07s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

436 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍16337.4%
13430.7%
🔥9421.6%
225.05%
💯204.59%
🤩20.459%
😢10.229%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 436reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2025 to 30 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Dec 2025, 09:39 UTC≈1,730 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @magzhantobyktyFile

📖 Благодарственное письмо ✍️ Магжан Тобыкты 🗓 8/7/1447 х. — 28.12.2025 г. 📂 Скачать PDF @magzhantobykty

7

30 Dec 2025, 09:39 UTC≈1,700 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @magzhantobyktyFile

📖 Алғыс хат ✍️ Мағжан Тобықты 🗓 8/7/1447 һ. — 28.12.2025 г. 📂 PDF жүктеу @magzhantobykty

👍3

9 Dec 2025, 18:07 UTC≈8,080 views48 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вопрос: Несколько дней назад братья спросили меня об устазах: Абу Мухаммаде Дильмураде и Абу Марьяме Надре. Ответ: Уважаемые братья Абу Мухаммад Дильмурад и Абу Марьям Надра — одни из проповедников и преподавателей-суннитов. Они обучались и получали пользу у шейхов. В начале пути поиска знаний я был одним из тех, кто извлёк пользу от них. Поэтому учиться и извлекать пользу у них — будет полезно для тех, кто хочет

🔥24158👍1

9 Dec 2025, 18:07 UTC≈2,950 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

سألني الإخوة قبل أيام عن الأستاذين أبي محمد ديلموراد، وأبي مريم نضرة فأقول مجيبا: إن الأخوين الفاضلين أبا محمد ديلموراد وأبا مريم من دعاة، ومعلّمي أهل السنة، وقد درسا عند المشايخ، واستفادا منهم، علما بأنني أحد المستفيدين منهما في بداية الطلب؛ لذا فالأخذ عنهما، والإفادة منهما مفيدة لمن رغب في الوصول للإفادة والتعلم. نحسبهما كذلك والله حسيبهما. وخاصة بعدما جمع شيخنا العلامة عبد الله بن عبد الرحيم البخاري - حفظه الل

10

9 Dec 2025, 18:06 UTC≈2,740 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Вопрос: несколько дней назад братья спросили меня об устазах: Абу Мухаммаде Дильмураде и Абу Марьяме Надре 🎙️Алтай Беріш 📆 18/6/1447 х. — 9.12.2025 г. @mizan_islam

🔥13👍53😢1

7 Dec 2025, 16:56 UTC≈15,400 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Имам Раби: «Настоящий шейх [устаз, наставник] — это тот, кто вернулся на родину и живет вместе с народом, разделяя с ним и радости, и трудности, а не тот, кто отучился и остался жить в стране учебы» @mizan_islam

👍126🔥2

28 Nov 2025, 09:57 UTC≈3,130 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Шейх, профессор Абдулла аль-Бухари

👍257🔥6🤩2

27 Nov 2025, 11:04 UTC≈2,050 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sunnaportalVideo

Если ты не понимаешь этого, то ты не ищущий знаний – алляма Абдуллах аль-Бухари (да хранит его Аллах) https://youtu.be/_y_0PgwyPaU 29/5/1447 х. – 20.11.2025 г. Перевод: Ахмад Гапонов Редакция: Алтай Беріш @sunnaportal

👍13🔥64

26 Nov 2025, 11:29 UTC≈2,480 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @talant_kazakhstani

Гонка за титулами (устаз, шейх) и старшинством Уважаемый шейх доктор Абдуллах бин Салфиқ аз-Зафири сказал: "Один из самых отвратительных нравов среди ищущих шариатские знания — это стремление к главенству, гонка за титулами (устаз, шейх) и старшинством. Всё это [благие нравы] мы утратили после смерти наших шейхов и учёных. Ведь истинное, приносящее пользу знание — это то, что порождает богобоязненность перед Алла

👍105🔥5

21 Nov 2025, 07:18 UTC≈2,230 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @talant_kazakhstani

Сколько лет ты учился? Уважаемый шейх, алляма, воспитатель Абдуллах Бухари, да хранит его Аллах, сказал: "Ты учился год, а другой — двадцать лет. Но бывает так, что учившийся год или два оказывается более проницательным, внимательным и точным в понимании, чем тот, кто учился двадцать лет. Следовательно, годы обучения не являются показателем отличия". На уроке: شرح كتاب العلم من صحيح البخاري @talant_kazakhstani

16👍13🔥3

19 Nov 2025, 04:00 UTC≈2,220 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Arafatbinhassan_ruPhoto

Шейхульислам Ибн Таймия писал: «Стремящийся к главенству (даже если он делает это не по праву) одобряет любую похвалу в свой адрес, даже если он её не заслуживает, и гневается на любое осуждение, даже если он его заслуживает. Верующий же одобряет истину, выгодна она лично ему или нет, и осуждает ложь, выгодна она лично ему или нет; ведь Аллах любит истину, правдивость и справедливость и ненавидит ложь и несправедли

👍102🔥21

17 Nov 2025, 03:51 UTC≈2,190 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Arafatbinhassan_ru

Желание главенствовать – недуг и смертельная болезнь Тому, кто хочет главенствовать, но при этом обладает дурным нравом, мы говорим: «Сначала привей себе хорошие качества, побойся Аллаха и не разобщай своих братьев». К сожалению, мы утратили это важнейшее качество. Наши праведные предшественники предпочитали в нужный момент сломить себя и проявить скромность, но почему? Потому что их знания прививали им благонравие

6👍5🔥5

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mizan_islam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 706,886 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“На весах Сунны” (@mizan_islam), 2,521 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mizan_islam.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.