Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Salafi Recordings

@SalafiRecording

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

11,245subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001584013686
TypeChannel
Username@SalafiRecording
Description𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐓𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐦 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐒𝐚𝐥𝐚𝐟𝐢 𝐑𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬 𝐵𝑒𝓃𝑒𝒻𝒾𝓉𝓈 & 𝑅𝑒𝓂𝒾𝓃𝒹𝑒𝓇𝓈 ɪɴꜱᴛᴀɢʀᴀᴍ & ᴛᴡɪᴛᴛᴇʀ 👉🏽@SalafiRecording Maintained by Abū Danyaal Ali
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SalafiRecording

Growth

11,23711,25411,245.56 August 2026 — 11,254 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,254 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,253 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,252 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,248 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,246 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,242 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,237 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,240 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,245 subscribers11,2456 August 202614 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,234–11,257 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 21:4611,245+5
13 Aug 2026, 15:4811,240+3
12 Aug 2026, 17:3311,237-5
11 Aug 2026, 18:0711,242-4
10 Aug 2026, 17:5811,246-2
9 Aug 2026, 17:4111,248-4
7 Aug 2026, 12:0611,252-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:2211,253-1
6 Aug 2026, 04:4511,254no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:3811,254first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.8%
avg views ÷ 11,245 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,550
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held23 (14 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total34,023
Reactions total380
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 03:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,220
Videos
318
Links
1,630

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

428 reactions across 23 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
38088.8%
👍307.01%
🔥184.21%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 428reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC≈1,090 views31 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

𝗔 𝗟𝗶𝘃𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗗𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗵…

26🔥3👍2

11 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC≈1,090 views13 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🎥 NEW UPLOAD - If You're Wrong, Then ADMIT IT! ‎🎙By Sh. Uways at-Taweel حفظه الله ⁩ ‎Link 👉🏽 ⁦ youtu.be/I8Pcp09Xg6M ⁩

11👍2

9 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTC≈1,080 views8 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @MarkazSalafi

LIVE NOW: The final session and closing remarks of the conference will be delivered by Shaikhs Abu Idrees, Abu Khadeejah, Uwais At-Taweel, and Abu Hafsah Kashiff inshā’Allāh. https://salafipublications.mixlr.com/

5👍2🔥1

9 Aug 2026, 13:51 UTC≈1,120 views7 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @SalafiPubsUKVideo

Starting in around 40 minutes inshā'Allāh at the Birmingham Summer Salafi Conference: 🔹 Farewell Advice of the Prophet (ﷺ), and Final Warnings from Shirk By Shaikh Abū Hafsah Kāshiff Khan (hafidhahullāh) Streaming live at salafipublications.mixlr.com at: 🇬🇧 14:30 • 🇸🇦 16:30 • 🇵🇰 18:30 • 🇲🇾 21:30 • 🇺🇸 9:30am (NYC)

6👍1

9 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC753 views6 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @abukhadeejahspPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

6

7 Aug 2026, 15:28 UTC≈1,160 views8 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @MarkazSalafiVideo

LIVE NOW - Shaykh Abu Khadeejah (حفظه الله): https://salafipublications.mixlr.com/

8

4 Aug 2026, 18:35 UTC≈1,170 views17 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @abukhadeejahspPhoto

Here's the Conference Schedule for this August Weekend at The Salafi Masjid, Wright Street, Small Heath, Birmingham. Please take a good look at the lecture timings. Even Friday is filled with classes and benefits—so join us this Friday (at Jumu'ah), and stay around till Sunday. Meet others who have the same desire to learn the teachings of the Qur'ān and Sunnah as understood by the Companions of the Prophet (ﷺ). A

12🔥3👍2

3 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC≈1,940 views36 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

33🔥2👍1

31 Jul 2026, 16:31 UTC≈1,660 views16 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @abukhadeejahspPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

16

31 Jul 2026, 12:23 UTC≈1,420 views9 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @abukhadeejahspPhoto

Today: Friday 31 July at the Salafi Masjid, Birmingham.

9

30 Jul 2026, 14:32 UTC≈1,530 views9 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @abukhadeejahsp

How to Repel the Whisperings of Shaytan and Doubts in Worship: Waswās and Waswasah in Tahārah and Salāh (Article and Video) https://abukhadeejah.com/whisperings-of-shaytan-and-doubts-in-worship-youtube-video/

9

30 Jul 2026, 12:43 UTC≈1,450 views8 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @abukhadeejahsp

WHISPERINGS OF SHAYTĀN AND DOUBTS IN WORSHIP Benefits from Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymīn (رحمه الله) regarding one’s intention and doubts in acts of worship. • An important principle regarding the one who has doubts about his act of worship after completing it, with examples. • Doubt that enters during an act of worship. • Differentiating between legitimate doubt and whisperings from Shayṭān. • The makhraj (exit) Allāh has

8

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @SalafiRecording. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 874,379 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Salafi Recordings” (@SalafiRecording), 11,245 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SalafiRecording.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.