Channel
@AbuIyaadSP
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
6,643subscribers
-20 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001239903284 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AbuIyaadSP |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AbuIyaadSP |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:27 | 6,643 | -5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:45 | 6,648 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:11 | 6,652 | -9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:10 | 6,661 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:52 | 6,663 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (24 June 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 13,790 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 02:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Shaykh Muḥammad Amān al-Jāmī on the Status of Ibn Hajar, al-Nawawī and Their Likes Quote: "I wish to say that errors occurred from some of the Tābiʿīn, and the followers of the Tābiʿīn, and after them, from the Imāms in the [subject] of the Names and the Attributes, [through] taʿwīl, and before us, the Imāms who bequeathed this scholarly legacy to us, were fully aware of them, their position and their errors, but th…
The Divine Decree: He Ate Pork, Drank Wine, Had Intercourse, Went to Sleep, Had a Dream, Became A Muslim, and Then Got Killed Allāh’s Messenger (صلى الله عليه وسلم) said: "By Him in Whose Hand is my soul... indeed, one of you works the deeds of the people of Hell until there is only an arm’s length between him and it, then the Book (the Decree) overtakes him, and he does the deeds of the people of Paradise and ente…
Shaykh Rabīʿ Bin Hādī: The Causes of Differing and Fitnah: Silence and Not Clarifying the Truth to People Quote: "It is very likely that the cause of this great tribulation and its consequences is the silence of the silent, those who refuse to fulfil this collective obligation whose objective has not been achieved by the refutation of one person alone." Read more: https://abuiyaad.com/q/rabee-silence-cause-fitnah
Part 10: Follow Up Questions to Fāliḥ After His Failure to Respond to Advice and Correction Shaykh Rabīʿ: "Why did you not reply to the two advices which you promised to refute? What prevented you from fulfilling this promise, and what do you call this (failure)? And why did you not respond to the questions I posed to you over a month ago?" Read more: https://abuiyaad.com/q/rabee-falih-questions
Part 9: The Dirty War: Reversing The Polished Sharp-Edged Blade to the Neck of its Wielder Shaykh Rabīʿ highlights the dishonesty of Fāliḥ and his followers in falsely accusing him of allowing compromise in the foundations of Islām and even intimating takfīr of him. However, Shaykh Rabīʿ skilfully reverses the blade upon the neck of its wielder in establishment of truth and justice. Shaykh Rabīʿ: “I have written ar…
FREE EBOOK Repelling the Accusation of Irjāʾ from the Scholars of Ahl al-Sunnah This is a book from 2014 refuting the doubts of an extreme wave of Ḥaddādīs such as ʿAbd al-Ḥamīd al-Juhanī, Badr al-Dīn al-Munāṣarah, ʿAbd Allāh al-Jarbūʿ, Aḥmad al-Ḥāzimī, ʿAbd Allāh Ṣawwān al-Ghāmidī, ʿImād Farāj, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Yūsuf al-Zākūrī al-Maghribī, (and also the Egyptian, Hishām al-Beily), who all raised issues pertaining to…
Part 8: The Dirty War: The Issue of Prayer and Invoking Mercy for Sinful Muslims and Innovators Shaykh Rabīʿ: “Have you forgotten (O Fāliḥ) your false principles and your severe judgements against innocent people, or who may have had errors? You exaggerated in judging them.” Read more: https://abuiyaad.com/q/rabee-falih-war
Part 7: Second Brotherly Advice to Faliḥ To Validate His Tabdiʿ and End the Fitnah He Started Shaykh Rabīʿ: “If you do not bring evidence [for this expulsion] and the underlying causes for this disparagement... tribulations will arise and differing will occur among Salafīs and the revilements made by each side upon the other will increase. Nothing will put an end to all of this except by mentioning sufficiently the …
Part 6: First Brotherly Advice to Faliḥ Regarding Tabdīʿ, Taqlīd and Other Issues Shaykh Rabīʿ: “The scholars in our religion are not followed except when their sayings are based on the texts of the Book and the Sunnah, and if their sayings oppose the texts, it is obligatory to oppose them and reject them. When evidences are lacking, it is not binding upon anyone to follow them.” Read more: https://abuiyaad.com/q/r…
FREE EBOOK: Excerpts from the Refutation of the Falsehoods of ʿAbd al-Laṭīf Bāshmīl by Shaykh Rabīʿ bin Hadī (رحمه الله). Quote: "Indeed, the problems and tribulations of ʿAbd al-Laṭīf require reflection, contemplation and deep thought and what he makes apparent of loyalty to the state and to some of the scholars through deception and cunning cannot be taken (at face value). The problems of ʿAbd al-Laṭīf, his tribu…
Part 5: Debating Fāliḥ About the Affair of Taqlīd (in His Tabdīʿ of Innocent People) Shaykh Rabīʿ: "Shaykh Fāliḥ has appointed himself a muftī over very serious affairs within and outside the kingdom whereby he harmed many people by making tabdīʿ of them, reviling them, and tarnishing their reputation within and outside the kingdom. Hence, he harmed the Salafī daʿwah and tarnished it and its followers." Read more: …
Part 4: The Innovators Are the Foremost of Those Who Deserve Disparagement by the Imāms of Ḥadīth Shaykh Rabīʿ’s response to the claim that Ḥammād bin Zayd and Shaykh Ibn Bāz agreed with Fāliḥ al-Ḥarbī in excluding the affairs of tabdiʿ from the domain of disparagement of narrators. Read more: https://abuiyaad.com/q/rabee-innovators-jarh-foremost
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @AbuIyaadSP. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@AbuIyaadSP edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 162,805 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Abu Iyaad SP” (@AbuIyaadSP), 6,643 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AbuIyaadSP.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.